|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quasars as Gamma Ray Bursts near the Nucleus of Atom Totality and whythe Cosmos is "not dead cold" and quasars as gamma-ray bursts of Atom
Wikipedia has a list of Gamma Ray Bursts and says this about one of them: Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are flashes of gamma rays associated with extremely energetic explosions in distant galaxies; they are the most luminous electromagnetic events in the universe since the Big Bang. Their duration is typically a few seconds, but can range from a few milliseconds to several minutes. The initial burst is usually followed by a longer-lived "afterglow" emitting at longer wavelengths (X-ray, ultraviolet, optical, infrared, and radio). (snipped) This combination of extreme brightness and great distance requires a tremendously energetic source. Assuming the gamma-ray explosion to be spherical, the energy output of GRB 080319B would be within a factor of two of the rest-mass energy of the Sun (the energy which would be released were the Sun to be converted entirely into radiation.) No known process in the Universe can produce this much energy in such a short time period. --- end quote --- In an Atom Totality Theory, most energy is in the Nucleus, and as Dirac described "new radioactivities" in order for the Universe to grow in accordance to mass and time, the energy in the Nucleus of the Atom Totality must appear or be released in a steady, steadfast release. The Universe has a temperature overall of about 4 degrees Kelvin. That temperature requires an energy source other than the energy from stars shining. If stars shining alone, then the Cosmic temperature would be near to 0 Kelvin than to 4 degrees Kelvin. So in order to have a Cosmos of 4 degrees Kelvin an energy source or a Cosmic Stove must be present. If in wintertime you feel the cold and you step into a building in which it causes you to take off your coat, means there is a "stove present". The Cosmic Stove is the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and is located beyond the Sloan Great Wall in the Quasar Belt. It is the furthest reach of the known Universe. What Quasars are, well, they are galaxies that have been "hit by a Cosmic Gamma Ray Burst" and are like a "mirror" reflecting outwards that burst. So the most dense galaxies in the cosmos are near the Nucleus of the Atom Totality, and furnishes the rest of the Universe a nice inhabitable temperature of 4 Kelvin. In the Big Bang Theory there can be no nucleus. In the Atom Totality Theory, the Cosmos is the inside of a gigantic plutonium atom and has a Nucleus. The missing mass of the Cosmos is there because most of the mass resides (99% resides) in the Nucleus. It is a fiery hot region with billions of quasars surrounding it. All those quasars are momentary gamma ray bursts in which those galaxies reflect the burst outwards into the rest of the Cosmos. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
quasars as gamma-ray bursts of Atom Totality Nucleus #30 ;3rd edition
wrote: (snipped) In an Atom Totality Theory, most energy is in the Nucleus, and as Dirac described "new radioactivities" in order for the Universe to grow in accordance to mass and time, the energy in the Nucleus of the Atom Totality must appear or be released in a steady, steadfast release. The Universe has a temperature overall of about 4 degrees Kelvin. That temperature requires an energy source other than the energy from stars shining. If stars shining alone, then the Cosmic temperature would be near to 0 Kelvin than to 4 degrees Kelvin. I have to do some checking for, not sure if the Cosmic Temperature is 4 degrees Kelvin or whether it is 2.71 degrees Kelvin. What can be called a Cosmic Ambient temperature. Anyway, my point though is very clear, in that a Big Bang Universe is totally lacking in ability to explain the temperature being so "hot" although most people would not consider 2.71 degrees Kelvin as a hot temperature. But that 2.71 K is not attainable from the energy of stars shining which would be close to 0 K. So the way the Atom Totality is able to explain our hot Cosmos of 2.71 (or 4 if it is 4) Kelvin is via Dirac "new radioactivities" and that is due to Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts that gives us Quasars. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tifft quantized galaxy speeds #22 ;3rd edition book: ATOM TOTALITY(Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 9th 09 11:01 PM |
#1 new book; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANGTHEORY IN PHYSICS | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 13 | May 1st 09 06:25 AM |
#73 Newton's discovery that white light is composite; new book: "Howthe Universe is organized into Galaxies & Voids by the Atom Totality" | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 19th 08 07:06 AM |
Gamma Bursts ????? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | March 23rd 08 08:15 PM |
We have cosmic-ray-bursts, we have gamma-ray-bursts, what else do wehave? V838 | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 14th 03 06:24 PM |