A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Quasars as Gamma Ray Bursts near the Nucleus of Atom Totality and whythe Cosmos is "not dead cold" and quasars as gamma-ray bursts of Atom



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 13th 09, 06:00 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default Quasars as Gamma Ray Bursts near the Nucleus of Atom Totality and whythe Cosmos is "not dead cold" and quasars as gamma-ray bursts of Atom


Wikipedia has a list of Gamma Ray Bursts and says this about one of
them:

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are flashes of gamma rays associated with
extremely energetic explosions in distant galaxies; they are the most
luminous electromagnetic events in the universe since the Big Bang.
Their duration is typically a few seconds, but can range from a few
milliseconds to several minutes. The initial burst is usually followed
by a longer-lived "afterglow" emitting at longer wavelengths (X-ray,
ultraviolet, optical, infrared, and radio).
(snipped)
This combination of extreme brightness and great distance requires a
tremendously energetic source. Assuming the gamma-ray explosion to be
spherical, the energy output of GRB 080319B would be within a factor
of two of the rest-mass energy of the Sun (the energy which would be
released were the Sun to be converted entirely into radiation.)

No known process in the Universe can produce this much energy in such
a short time period.
--- end quote ---

In an Atom Totality Theory, most energy is in the Nucleus,
and as Dirac described "new radioactivities" in order for the
Universe to grow in accordance to mass and time, the energy
in the Nucleus of the Atom Totality must appear or be
released in a steady, steadfast release. The Universe has
a temperature overall of about 4 degrees Kelvin. That temperature
requires an energy source other than the energy from stars
shining. If stars shining alone, then the Cosmic temperature
would be near to 0 Kelvin than to 4 degrees Kelvin.

So in order to have a Cosmos of 4 degrees Kelvin an energy
source or a Cosmic Stove must be present. If in wintertime
you feel the cold and you step into a building in which it causes
you to take off your coat, means there is a "stove present".

The Cosmic Stove is the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and is
located beyond the Sloan Great Wall in the Quasar Belt. It is
the furthest reach of the known Universe. What Quasars are,
well, they are galaxies that have been "hit by a Cosmic Gamma
Ray Burst" and are like a "mirror" reflecting outwards that
burst.

So the most dense galaxies in the cosmos are near the Nucleus
of the Atom Totality, and furnishes the rest of the Universe
a nice inhabitable temperature of 4 Kelvin.

In the Big Bang Theory there can be no nucleus.

In the Atom Totality Theory, the Cosmos is the inside of
a gigantic plutonium atom and has a Nucleus. The missing
mass of the Cosmos is there because most of the mass
resides (99% resides) in the Nucleus. It is a fiery hot region
with billions of quasars surrounding it. All those quasars are
momentary gamma ray bursts in which those galaxies reflect
the burst outwards into the rest of the Cosmos.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #2  
Old May 13th 09, 06:16 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default quasars as gamma-ray bursts of Atom Totality Nucleus #30 ;3rd edition



wrote:
(snipped)

In an Atom Totality Theory, most energy is in the Nucleus,
and as Dirac described "new radioactivities" in order for the
Universe to grow in accordance to mass and time, the energy
in the Nucleus of the Atom Totality must appear or be
released in a steady, steadfast release. The Universe has
a temperature overall of about 4 degrees Kelvin. That temperature
requires an energy source other than the energy from stars
shining. If stars shining alone, then the Cosmic temperature
would be near to 0 Kelvin than to 4 degrees Kelvin.


I have to do some checking for, not sure if the Cosmic Temperature
is 4 degrees Kelvin or whether it is 2.71 degrees Kelvin. What can
be called a Cosmic Ambient temperature.

Anyway, my point though is very clear, in that a Big Bang Universe
is totally lacking in ability to explain the temperature being so
"hot"
although most people would not consider 2.71 degrees Kelvin as a
hot temperature. But that 2.71 K is not attainable from the energy
of stars shining which would be close to 0 K.

So the way the Atom Totality is able to explain our hot Cosmos of
2.71 (or 4 if it is 4) Kelvin is via Dirac "new radioactivities" and
that
is due to Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts that gives us Quasars.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tifft quantized galaxy speeds #22 ;3rd edition book: ATOM TOTALITY(Atom Universe) THEORY [email protected] Astronomy Misc 1 May 9th 09 11:01 PM
#1 new book; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANGTHEORY IN PHYSICS [email protected] Astronomy Misc 13 May 1st 09 06:25 AM
#73 Newton's discovery that white light is composite; new book: "Howthe Universe is organized into Galaxies & Voids by the Atom Totality" [email protected] Astronomy Misc 3 June 19th 08 07:06 AM
Gamma Bursts ????? G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 0 March 23rd 08 08:15 PM
We have cosmic-ray-bursts, we have gamma-ray-bursts, what else do wehave? V838 Archimedes Plutonium Astronomy Misc 0 July 14th 03 06:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.