SpaceX Falcon launch failuer

It appears it failed right before staging.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/28/tech...ket/index.html

This is the second failed resupply attempt I a row I believe.

This isn't great for SpaceX or the station right now.

The last one was Russian. maybe there is a gremlin at work.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________


"Greg (Strider) Moore" wrote in message
news
It appears it failed right before staging.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/28/tech...ket/index.html

This is the second failed resupply attempt I a row I believe.

This isn't great for SpaceX or the station right now.

On 6/28/15 12:42 PM, Brian Gaff wrote :
The last one was Russian. maybe there is a gremlin at work.


When was the last failure at Mars? Maybe the Martian gremlin as moved to
Earth.


Alain Fournier

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 11:49:43 AM UTC-4, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
It appears it failed right before staging.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/28/tech...ket/index.html

This is the second failed resupply attempt I a row I believe.

This isn't great for SpaceX or the station right now.

better to have a failure on a cargo craft, than a manned flight

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 3:34:23 PM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 11:49:43 AM UTC-4, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
It appears it failed right before staging.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/28/tech...ket/index.html

This is the second failed resupply attempt I a row I believe.

This isn't great for SpaceX or the station right now.

better to have a failure on a cargo craft, than a manned flight


Always the master of the obvious, Bob...

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

people like you need all the help you can get.....

the cargo runs were also a good test for the coming soon manned versions

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 12:42:53 PM UTC-4, Brian Gaff wrote:
The last one was Russian. maybe there is a gremlin at work.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________


"Greg (Strider) Moore" wrote in message
news
It appears it failed right before staging.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/28/tech...ket/index.html

This is the second failed resupply attempt I a row I believe.

This isn't great for SpaceX or the station right now.



The Pentagon this week updated the Law of War Manual which now permits targeting of individuals and enterprises that formerly were considered civilian calling them 'unprivileged belligerents'. This can include reporters or civilian enterprises that in the opinion of local commanders pose a significant threats to military aims and goals.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-pen...illing/5458128

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 7:39:00 PM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 3:34:23 PM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 11:49:43 AM UTC-4, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
It appears it failed right before staging.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/28/tech...ket/index.html

This is the second failed resupply attempt I a row I believe.

This isn't great for SpaceX or the station right now.

better to have a failure on a cargo craft, than a manned flight


Always the master of the obvious, Bob...


people like you need all the help you can get.....


And yet you seem to perpetually be the one getting it wrong. As you
do below...


the cargo runs were also a good test for the coming soon manned versions


No, Bob. Dragon V1 on Falcon 9 V1.0 is a very different vehicle than
Dragon V2 on Falcon 9 V1.1 or Falcon Heavy.


--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson

elon musk stated that since theres a lot in common between cargo and the new manned launcher the cargo runs would help test the systems.

diid anyone really believe space x would have a perfect success rate foorever?? some failures are to be anticipated

No gremlins are not bound by the laws of the physical world. they are there
to make sure people do not get too full of themselves and to leave that odd
doubt that superstition has some merit.
Like the number 13 for example.
Still being serious for a moment, I do think its a shame that cargo flights
do not have some kind of fail safe system or even an escape system as by now
there must be a lot of bits of space hardware strewn around the planet in
and out of orbit.

Brian

--
From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active
"Alain Fournier" wrote in message
...
On 6/28/15 12:42 PM, Brian Gaff wrote :
The last one was Russian. maybe there is a gremlin at work.


When was the last failure at Mars? Maybe the Martian gremlin as moved to
Earth.


Alain Fournier

Alain Fournier wrote:
On 6/28/15 12:42 PM, Brian Gaff wrote :
The last one was Russian. maybe there is a gremlin at work.

When was the last failure at Mars? Maybe the Martian gremlin as
moved to Earth.

I thought the Martian creature was a ghoul?-)

rick jones
--
a wide gulf separates "what if" from "if only"
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 8:23:07 PM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:
On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 7:39:00 PM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 3:34:23 PM UTC-4, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 11:49:43 AM UTC-4, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
It appears it failed right before staging.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/28/tech...ket/index.html

This is the second failed resupply attempt I a row I believe.

This isn't great for SpaceX or the station right now.

better to have a failure on a cargo craft, than a manned flight


Always the master of the obvious, Bob...


people like you need all the help you can get.....


And yet you seem to perpetually be the one getting it wrong. As you
do below...


the cargo runs were also a good test for the coming soon manned versions


No, Bob. Dragon V1 on Falcon 9 V1.0 is a very different vehicle than
Dragon V2 on Falcon 9 V1.1 or Falcon Heavy.


--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson

elon musk stated that since theres a lot in common between cargo and the new manned launcher the cargo runs would help test the systems.

diid anyone really believe space x would have a perfect success rate foorever?? some failures are to be anticipated

I thought his comments rather terse -

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/...459456?lang=en

Elon Musk, "There was an overpressure event in the upper stage liquid oxygen tank. Data suggests counterintuitive cause."

By the way, Tuesday was his 44th Birthday.