A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Which Apollo landing site would you revisit?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 11th 03, 06:22 AM
MondoMor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which Apollo landing site would you revisit?

Hallerb wrote:

Which Apollo landing site would you revisit?



Tycho crater and a landing on the backside of the moon. I doiubt any of the
sites have many footprints left after LM departure but it would be better to
vuisit new locations.

BECAUSE Appllos sites were picked mostly for safety first, not sciece return.

Tycho would correct that!



So you'd have NASA pick science over safety to return to the moon?
Don't you start thread after thread in sci.space.shuttle ****ing and
moaning about how science was put before safety in the shuttle program?

You are astoundingly stupid and hypocritical. Please tell me you aren't
reproducing.

  #2  
Old July 11th 03, 12:20 PM
Hallerb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which Apollo landing site would you revisit?


So you'd have NASA pick science over safety to return to the moon?
Don't you start thread after thread in sci.space.shuttle ****ing and
moaning about how science was put before safety in the shuttle program?


Well its been OVER 30 years. I ASSUMED the new lander would be safer, more
redundant and capable of going where no man has gone before..

It wouldnt be dangerous just more challenging. Besides Tycho was considered for
Apollo.

Some in orbit rescue ability, and a lander already on site would be good too,
Interesting place for a nice long stay.
  #3  
Old July 11th 03, 02:32 PM
MondoMor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which Apollo landing site would you revisit?

Hallerb wrote:
Well its been OVER 30 years. I ASSUMED the new lander would be safer, more
redundant and capable of going where no man has gone before..

It wouldnt be dangerous just more challenging. Besides Tycho was considered for
Apollo.

Some in orbit rescue ability, and a lander already on site would be good too,
Interesting place for a nice long stay.


"Wouldn't be dangerous"? Have you missed all the conversations and
posts about the immense risks of travelling to the moon? Even with the
advances since the '60s, it's still a dangerous proposition.

Have you looked up the word "hypocrite", bob?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hypocrite

You're cavalier ("Showing arrogant or offhand disregard") about risking
astronauts' lives to go to the moon, yet you want the shuttle system to
be totally safe.

Which is it, bob, you ignorant ass? I know you won't answer because
you're a coward too.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 April 2nd 04 12:01 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 February 2nd 04 04:33 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM
Which Apollo landing site would you revisit? Derek Lyons Space Shuttle 0 August 2nd 03 08:00 PM
Which Apollo landing site would you revisit? Keith F. Lynch History 0 July 11th 03 03:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.