Interpreting the MMX null result

"jem" wrote in message
...
kenseto wrote:

jem wrote:

kenseto wrote:
How can they be "arriving" at the detector when they're not moving wrt
the detector?


Sigh....isotropy means that the light rays are moving toward the
detector at the same speed in all directions.


And how is it that "the light rays are moving toward the detector", when
"the detector and the light rays are not in a state of relative motion"?

OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from all
directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.

kenseto wrote:

"jem" wrote in message
...

kenseto wrote:


jem wrote:


kenseto wrote:
How can they be "arriving" at the detector when they're not moving wrt
the detector?


Sigh....isotropy means that the light rays are moving toward the
detector at the same speed in all directions.


And how is it that "the light rays are moving toward the detector", when
"the detector and the light rays are not in a state of relative motion"?


OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from all
directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.



If they're in the "same state of motion", how does one move towards the
other?

jem wrote:

kenseto wrote:

"jem" wrote in message
...

kenseto wrote:


jem wrote:


kenseto wrote:
How can they be "arriving" at the detector when they're not moving wrt
the detector?



Sigh....isotropy means that the light rays are moving toward the
detector at the same speed in all directions.


And how is it that "the light rays are moving toward the detector", when
"the detector and the light rays are not in a state of relative motion"?



OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from all
directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.



If they're in the "same state of motion", how does one move towards the
other?

For that matter how can "the light rauys from all directions" be in the
same state of motion?

"jem" wrote in message
...
jem wrote:

kenseto wrote:

"jem" wrote in message
...

kenseto wrote:


jem wrote:


kenseto wrote:
How can they be "arriving" at the detector when they're not moving
wrt
the detector?



Sigh....isotropy means that the light rays are moving toward the
detector at the same speed in all directions.


And how is it that "the light rays are moving toward the detector",
when
"the detector and the light rays are not in a state of relative
motion"?



OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from
all
directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.



If they're in the "same state of motion", how does one move towards the
other?

For that matter how can "the light rauys from all directions" be in the
same state of motion?

Sigh....because they have the same relative motion wrt the DETECTOR.

"jem" wrote in message
...
kenseto wrote:

"jem" wrote in message
...

kenseto wrote:


jem wrote:


kenseto wrote:
How can they be "arriving" at the detector when they're not moving wrt
the detector?


Sigh....isotropy means that the light rays are moving toward the
detector at the same speed in all directions.


And how is it that "the light rays are moving toward the detector", when
"the detector and the light rays are not in a state of relative motion"?


OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from
all
directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.



If they're in the "same state of motion", how does one move towards the
other?

Sigh....notice that in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.

"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
news:ddDdh.305972$1i1.186344@attbi_s72...
kenseto wrote:

OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from
all
directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.




Isotropy (the opposite of anisotropy) is the property of being
independent
of direction. The speed of light c, is constant independent of
direction.
Relative motion between light sources and detector (observer) shows up
as
Doppler Effect.
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...lerEffect.html

****ing idiot runt.

In article ,
"kenseto" wrote:


"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
news:ddDdh.305972$1i1.186344@attbi_s72...
kenseto wrote:

OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from
all
directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.




Isotropy (the opposite of anisotropy) is the property of being
independent
of direction. The speed of light c, is constant independent of
direction.
Relative motion between light sources and detector (observer) shows up
as
Doppler Effect.
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...lerEffect.html

****ing idiot runt.

I think you got him too Sam ;-)

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In article kDEdh.261450$FQ1.121829@attbi_s71,
Sam Wormley wrote:

Seriously Seto, Isotropy (the opposite of anisotropy) is the property
of being independent of direction. The speed of light c, is constant
independent of direction. Relative motion between light sources and
detector (observer) shows up as Doppler Effect.
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...lerEffect.html

Do you not understand the concepts of isotropy and/or Doppler shift,
Seto?

Rhetorical question, Sam?

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

kenseto wrote:

"jem" wrote in message
...

kenseto wrote:


"jem" wrote in message
...


kenseto wrote:



jem wrote:



kenseto wrote:
How can they be "arriving" at the detector when they're not moving wrt
the detector?


Sigh....isotropy means that the light rays are moving toward the
detector at the same speed in all directions.


And how is it that "the light rays are moving toward the detector", when
"the detector and the light rays are not in a state of relative motion"?


OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from

all

directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.



If they're in the "same state of motion", how does one move towards the
other?


Sigh....notice that in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.



Just what do you think it means for two things to "share the same state
of relative motion"? Don't just repeat your MMX light ray mantra -
specify the criteria that determine whether *any* two things share the
same motion.

"jem" wrote in message
...
kenseto wrote:

"jem" wrote in message
...

kenseto wrote:


"jem" wrote in message
...


kenseto wrote:



jem wrote:



kenseto wrote:
How can they be "arriving" at the detector when they're not moving
wrt
the detector?


Sigh....isotropy means that the light rays are moving toward the
detector at the same speed in all directions.


And how is it that "the light rays are moving toward the detector",
when
"the detector and the light rays are not in a state of relative
motion"?


OK....maybe I should say that isotropy means that the light rays from

all

directions are in the same state of relative motion wrt the detector.



If they're in the "same state of motion", how does one move towards the
other?


Sigh....notice that in the same state of relative motion wrt the
detector.



Just what do you think it means for two things to "share the same state
of relative motion"? Don't just repeat your MMX light ray mantra -
specify the criteria that determine whether *any* two things share the
same motion.

Sigh....share the same relative motion as determined by the DETECTOR.