Proper explanation for the MMX null result.

Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back
when you have results (meaning never)

wrote in message
oups.com...

kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is
isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means
that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in
the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back
when you have results (meaning never)

You are a idiot runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR

Ken Seto

kenseto wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is
isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means
that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in
the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back
when you have results (meaning never)

You are a idiot runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR

Ken Seto

Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back
when you have results (meaning never) . Keep eating it.

kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

What is the difference in absolute speed at the two endpoints (source
and detector) that you derive from the measured Pound-Rebka shift?


Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto



Seto's immortal fumbles
http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+...ers.pandora.be

Seto is a registered crank at crank dot net
http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+...Awww.crank.net

wrote in message
oups.com...

kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is
isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means
that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in
the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back
when you have results (meaning never)

He never will, he can't even figure out which
direction is "up".

George

"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
news:9szPg.149566$FQ1.125423@attbi_s71...
kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is
isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means
that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in
the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto


Wormy is a runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR

Ken Seto

George Dishman wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is
isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means
that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in
the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back
when you have results (meaning never)

He never will, he can't even figure out which
direction is "up".

George

Ha,ha,ha. The best!

wrote in message
ups.com...

kenseto wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:

1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is
isotropic
HORIZONTALLY.
2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX)
is
oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This
means
that
the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This
interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and
the
predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT.

Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations
is in
the
paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in
my
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back
when you have results (meaning never)

You are a idiot runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR

Ken Seto

Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back
when you have results (meaning never) . Keep eating it.

Hey **** head if I have the resources to do the experiments I wouldn't be
wasting my time talking to idiot like you.