A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » FITS
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[fitsbits] Comments on image distortion conventions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 24th 08, 06:27 PM posted to sci.astro.fits
Doug Mink
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default [fitsbits] Comments on image distortion conventions

Dick Shaw wrote:
Regarding the proposed Simple Imaging Polynomial (SIP) convention for
representing non-linear image distortions:

1. The document should specify default values for any coefficients that are
absent from the header, but might be expected based upon the value of A_ORDER
or B_ORDER. Presumably either the values would be taken to be zero or the
convention should require that all keywords be present. Similarly, are A_ORDER
and B_ORDER restricted to be non-negative?


This should all be included in the document.

2. It is unfortunate that the transformation goes directly from raw array
pixels to world coordinates, without defining an intermediate pixel coordinate
system. This approach carries some liabilities, one of which follows:

3. The convention would appear to mis-use the CTYPEi reserved keyword in a way
that at least technically violates the FITS standard. Quoting from the
definition of this term in Sect. 8.2 of the FITS V3.0 Standard: "All
non-linear coordinate system names _must_ be expressed in "4-3" form: the
first four characters specify the coordinate type, the fifth character is a
hyphen, and the remaining three characters specify an algorithm code for
computing the world coordinate value...."


First I should say that my WCSTools package can read both SIP and TNX distortion
parameters. The SIP implementation is based on code from IPAC and the TNX
implementation is based on my translation of IRAF SPP code into C. The Harvard
DASCH plate digitization project is using TNX with great success for very wide
field plates taken with small telescopes (though they have found a few bugs in
my subroutines).

SIP's 4-3-3 usage is an artifact of a time in the development of the FITS WCS
distortion standard when the 3-character suffix was proposed as a standard.
I think that there is an advantage in following the plate solution tradition
of including distortion in the pixel - world coordinate transformation directly.
If the appropriate keywords are provided so that a reasonable WCS is obtained
using the standard keywords and the first 8 characters of the CTYPEi, there
shouldn't be too much of a problem.

TNX adds a melange of nested multi-line/multi-value keywords to FITS, but it works
and has been used for lots of images. There is also a ZPX variation on ZPN, but
that seems not to have been used as often.

-Doug Mink
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[fitsbits] Comments on image distortion conventions Dick Shaw FITS 0 September 18th 08 10:15 PM
[fitsbits] comment on SIP, optical distortion Norbert Zacharias FITS 0 September 18th 08 07:00 PM
[fitsbits] FITS Conventions reminder William Pence FITS 0 June 13th 07 08:54 PM
[fitsbits] FITS Conventions reminder William Pence FITS 0 May 15th 07 09:10 PM
[fitsbits] Registry of FITS Conventions William Pence FITS 0 July 10th 06 07:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.