|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard
Actually it should probably be 1.3, but 3.0 if you prefer!
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Boud Roukema wrote: On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Doug Tody wrote: If we ever do a FITS 2.0 we should revisit this, but it is hard to do more at this point for standard FITS than recommend that multiple values not be allowed in the first place. Once they are there you have a problem. - Doug AFAIK we're already doing FITS 3.0 now, no need to revert to FITS 2.0: http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_draft.html boud _______________________________________________ fitsbits mailing list http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/fitsbits |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | Jonathan McDowell | FITS | 0 | August 17th 07 09:32 PM |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | Mark Calabretta | FITS | 0 | August 2nd 07 09:39 AM |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | Mark Calabretta | FITS | 0 | August 2nd 07 01:28 AM |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | Steve Allen | FITS | 0 | August 1st 07 06:08 PM |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | Thierry Forveille | FITS | 0 | August 1st 07 04:51 PM |