NASA uses Mars as an excuses to keep ISS

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:

Alzheimer's delusions snipped

:Unless you totally evacuate the volume first, it will ALLWAYS require
:more air than the contained volume.
:

Of course it will, but it will *NOT* require (for example) four total
replacements to get contaminant concentrations down to 1/16 of the
original, which was what you were asserting before.

What I said was ABOUT, i.e. a first order approximation.

It could take less than 4 or more than 4 to get to 6% contamination depending
on the turbulence of the air flow which, among other things, will depend on
the inlet/outlet area compared to the compartment cross section area.

snip remaining old fart gibber


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
Too stupid for too long, Chimp, and you're still showing no sign of
developing a clue.


Gibbering old fool.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:

:In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
: Too stupid for too long, Chimp, and you're still showing no sign of
: developing a clue.
:
:
:Gibbering old fool.
:

Poor Jimp the Chimp just can't stop throwing his own feces, can he?

Hmmm, must have backed McCall into a corner again, as once he sees
no other way out his dementia puts him into childish insult mode.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Sep 3, 9:59 am, Marvin the Martian wrote:
Here the argument is that NASA needs to spend money and time on their toy
space station.

The ISS is not NASA's toy. If they want to wastefully
toss the ISS into the garbage like they have done with
a wide array of other programs they have invested in
and then tossed away after developing them in the past,
then they will have half a dozen other space agencies on
their case reminding them that it is NOT THEIR STATION to
throw away.

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:

:In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
: wrote:
:
: :In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
: : Too stupid for too long, Chimp, and you're still showing no sign of
: : developing a clue.
: :
: :
: :Gibbering old fool.
: :
:
: Poor Jimp the Chimp just can't stop throwing his own feces, can he?
:
:Hmmm, must have backed McCall into a corner again, as once he sees
:no other way out his dementia puts him into childish insult mode.
:

You're the one who slashed everything out and went to insult, Chimp.

What I did was snip out about 200 lines of gibbering irrelevancies, false
analogies, arm waving, and arrogant nonsense and went to the heart of the
issue.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

In sci.physics troll wrote:
On Sep 3, 9:59 am, Marvin the Martian wrote:
Here the argument is that NASA needs to spend money and time on their toy
space station.

The ISS is not NASA's toy. If they want to wastefully
toss the ISS into the garbage like they have done with
a wide array of other programs they have invested in
and then tossed away after developing them in the past,
then they will have half a dozen other space agencies on
their case reminding them that it is NOT THEIR STATION to
throw away.

NASA doesn't have to fullfill the current agreement to deorbit the ISS,
all NASA has to do is walk away and stop funding it.

The end will come soon after.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:

insults snipped

Nothing left.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:

insults snipped

Nothing left.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:

snip childish insults

Nothing left.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.