Aether Foreshortning at c

On 2/29/2012 12:32 PM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
wrote:


What a boner.

Strange how everyone that disagrees with you either gets
threatened with physical assault or insulted.

Isn't "boner" typically an inference to some sort of sexual innuendo?


He's calling me a dick...Which has it's own interesting derivation.












--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:40:27 -0500, HVAC wrote:

On 2/28/2012 6:28 AM, Painius wrote:


That is a very good point. There are many different faiths with
different texts. There are different kinds of atheists, as well.
Nobody really knows who, if anybody, is "right".


Well, except that in your religious views, YOU and YOU alone
are correct. That's EXACTLY the view of a true believer.

If you continue to accept that, then it's based upon the fact that you
have absolutely no sense at all.

Since that is unlikely, then it must be concluded that you only say
that to try to push my buttons. Good luck with that, PushyVAC.

(Doesn't "pushy" sound a lot like "pussy"?)

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Unimaginative people find refuge in consistency."

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:57:28 -0500, HVAC wrote:

On 2/28/2012 6:18 PM, Painius wrote:


That is a very good point. There are many different faiths with
different texts. There are different kinds of atheists, as well.
Nobody really knows who, if anybody, is "right".


Well, except that in your religious views, YOU and YOU alone
are correct. That's EXACTLY the view of a true believer.

Can you come up with nothing besides idiocy?


Please explain.

You claim that everyone that believes in god is a sheep.

You claim that everyone that does NOT believes in god is a sheep.

And, of course, there's YOU who isn't a sheep because you
have no opinion/backbone.

I *have* explained, several times in fact. Either you are too dense
or too argumentative to open your eyes. Ewe are a blind, bleating,
sheepish atheist. So it's not a huge surprise that you post like an
imbecile.

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Unimaginative people find refuge in consistency."

On 2/29/2012 12:36 PM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
wrote:


See my signature for a fun perspective on this statement (which is
definitely not intended to be insulting)...

Ya, and he said that quite a while ago. Before big media came to
the fore and brought forth what we have now....Robots who say exactly
what they are told to say and look exactly how they are told to look.

Tom Jefferson, Lincoln...None would be elected to dog catcher today.


PS- With no intention to insult, don't you live in NORTH America?










--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:01:26 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
atheist goddess" wrote:

On 2012-Feb-28 15:24, Painius wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:34:43 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
atheist wrote:
On 2012-Feb-28 03:46, Painius wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:14:15 -0500, wrote:
On 2/26/2012 1:42 PM, Painius wrote:

Hmm. Perhaps you *are* ready to hear my alternate view of
gravitation. A first clue would be the answer to the following
question: What is the only known thing that can "escape" a black
hole?

Here we go........

A true scientist might be able to refute my version of gravitation.
You never have. The only thing you've done is to bring up how the Le
Sage theory has been thoroughly refuted. Old news.

Think of a new reason my modern version of "push" gravity is not
viable, or shut the heck up, BocaGrandeVAC.

Your anger indicates that you feel cornered which means that you are
unable to refute HVAC with a credible argument.

Your name calling indicates that you are immature.

You should take a break.

Which would you like me to break? Your leg or your neck?

Your threats of harm against me lack credence, for those who make
threats rarely follow through on them. Why would you want to harm
someone you've never met in person anyway, particularly when you don't
really know their background (e.g., weapons knowledge, combat training,
connections to powerful people, etc.)?

Here's a free lesson in street smarts for you: If you can't reliably
determine that you're out of your league, the safe option is to assume
that you are.

You sensed anger. You sensed incorrectly. Big surprise.

I did not sense anger, but you clearly made a threat in the form of a
question, which may indicate an underlying psychopathic aspect of your
character. The fact that you're denying anger confirms that you have
the potential to be one of the more dangerous types of psychopaths (are
you sure that you really want to go down this ominous path?).

Will you stop being idiotic for just a moment?

You said:
Your anger indicates that you feel cornered which means that you are
unable to refute HVAC with a credible argument.

If you did not sense anger, then why did you say that? And what
precisely was there to refute? HVAC just said:

Here we go........

He has never been able to refute my alternative gravitation idea -
never. Nor was there anything he said that could have been refuted.
Nothing about "here we go" is refutable.

You take HVAC's side merely because he is a baa baa black sheep
atheist just like yourself. That makes you as unscientific as he is.

Bleat away, little lamb. Is that your ewe calling? Is Harlow your
ram? He seems to have rammed his imbecilic **** right down your
throat. And you keep cumming back for more.

Bleat away, little lamb. HVAC will slaughter you some day. He likes
to slaughter those who disagree with him. Go ahead. Test it.
Disagree with him, but not right away. Catch him off guard. See if
he doesn't blindly come at you with his sharp-edged words.

To ally yourself with the wrong people just because they are also
atheists is asking for big trouble. Atheism does not make you smart.
It just makes you bleat very loud.

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Unimaginative people find refuge in consistency."

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:39:04 -0500, HVAC wrote:

On 2/29/2012 12:01 AM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
wrote:


Which would you like me to break? Your leg or your neck?

Your threats of harm against me lack credence, for those who make
threats rarely follow through on them. Why would you want to harm
someone you've never met in person anyway, particularly when you don't
really know their background (e.g., weapons knowledge, combat training,
connections to powerful people, etc.)?

Here's a free lesson in street smarts for you: If you can't reliably
determine that you're out of your league, the safe option is to assume
that you are.


If you can't prove that someone is out of his league and might
kill him, or prove that they WON'T kill him, then Painus has no
opinion on that subject.

I mean, it can't be proved one way or the other.

I don't even have an opinion on whether or not YOU exist. There is no
scientific proof nor hard evidence either way, BotVAC.

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Unimaginative people find refuge in consistency."

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:40:19 -0500, HVAC wrote:

On 2/29/2012 12:01 AM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
wrote:


Which would you like me to break? Your leg or your neck?



I did not sense anger, but you clearly made a threat in the form of a
question, which may indicate an underlying psychopathic aspect of your
character. The fact that you're denying anger confirms that you have the
potential to be one of the more dangerous types of psychopaths (are you
sure that you really want to go down this ominous path?).




Painus made that statement out of anger and frustration.
Normally, he would never threaten anyone.
But it IS understandable under these conditions.

Please allow me to extend an apology on Painus' behalf.

LOL

On 2012-Feb-28 07:37, Painius wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:43:11 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
atheist wrote:
On 2012-Feb-26 14:29, Painius wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:22 -0500, wrote:
On 2/25/2012 8:23 PM, Painius wrote:

Then how about: A lack of belief in a deity or deities, for which
there is no proof nor hard evidence, is faith?

Is THIS what you have come to?
Double talk and double negatives?

Is THIS what you have come to?
Asking moronic, stupid questions?

Is THIS what you have come to?
Utilizing ad hominem attacks because you can't win?

Is THIS what you have come to?
Saying that I can't win when, in truth, I can't lose?

Is THIS what you have come to?
Using implications to disguise feelings of self-doubt?

("Not losing" is not the opposite of winning.)

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on
authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason.
Science will win because it works."
-- Dr. Stephen W. Hawking

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:56:10 -0500, HVAC wrote:

On 2/28/2012 6:38 PM, Painius wrote:


Don't think that this goes unnoted by others.


LOL! Please list the 'others'. I'll wait right here....

Oh, there must be at least two or three others out there that read you
besides me.


And you have evidence that they are keeping notes?
Oh, I see... There's no evidence that they are NOT keeping notes.

I see this subject really pushes your buttons. It must be very
important to you whether or not you are read and followed. You
shouldn't really let the likes of me push your buttons like that. It
means that you allow me to control you.

And to be able to control you isn't even on my list of things I want
for my birthday.

"Space-time is the unbounded 4 dimensional expanse that
contains all material objects in the universe, and is distorted
by the presence of a mass".

If there's any of that that you do not quite fully grasp,
please let me know and I will try to dumb it down even more.

Redundant. You say that... I say this... "what precisely is
distorted"... you say that... "spacetime"... I say this... "what is it
about spacetime that is distorted"... you say that... "SPACETIME, YOU
IDIOT - SPACETIME IS DISTORTED"

Broken record that you could not possibly dumb down any more due to
the fact that you're completely unable to understand what you wrote.


Apparently the term space-time offends you. Very well. Here's a
NEW definition that does not include the term space-time.

"What is being distorted by any mass is the unbounded 4 dimensional
expanse that contains all material objects in the universe".

(This should be good.)

Now, tell us please, exactly what is it about that "unbounded
4-dimensional expanse" that is distorted? What does that expanse
contain, or what is it comprised of, that is or can be distorted?

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Unimaginative people find refuge in consistency."

On 2012-Feb-28 07:43, Painius wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:47:11 -0800, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
atheist wrote:
On 2012-Feb-26 14:35, Painius wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:46:29 -0500, wrote:
On 2/26/2012 2:54 AM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess wrote:

A belief in something for which no evidence exists is religion.

So the corollary is that to believe there are no deities is a
religious belief?

To believe that there are no deities is a "belief."

This is what I was referring to when I said he had painted
himself into a corner. But before anyone feels sorry for him,
bear in mind that HE painted HIMSELF into that corner.

I love it when you use colorful words, HiccupVAC!

Making fun of peoples' names in this manner is a sign of immaturity that
doesn't help your position.

Why do you object? "Panus" certainly doesn't.

Mine wasn't an objection, it was a factual observation.

Harlow and I have been making fun of each other's names for years,
Fidem.

That's not relevant.

You jealous? Heaven forbid you should feel left out.

No, jealousy is an emotion that I've not experienced naturally.

Okay, how about this: You, Fiddy, are just too much tur bear!

Feel better, now?

My feelings haven't changed, but now I'm wondering if the example you
chose that I'm "too much to bear" reflects your true feelings on a
sub-conscious level? After all, reflecting on attempts at cleverness
and humour can provide a lot of insight about a person's true character.

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Darwin works in mysterious ways (and that applies to everyone)."
-- Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey