Tonight is the big DEBATE..

On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 10:34:14 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 11:17:37 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:44:14 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 9:45:03 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics.

And they are Democrats.

Mostly, they are southern Republicans.

No, they are inner-city democrats.

No, they are angry old ignorants like you

On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 11:22:27 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote:

In this country, you are innocent until found guilty.

With positions of high power you are expected to be above reproach.

A nice ideal. But not one that has ever been met. So we'll need to
settle for the law.

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:34:11 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 11:17:37 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:44:14 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 9:45:03 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics.

And they are Democrats.

Mostly, they are southern Republicans.

No, they are inner-city democrats.

As education increases, voter turnout increases. As education
increases, progressive views increase. As education increases, the
things Republicans push for lose. It's no wonder that a primary target
of Republicans throughout the country is quality education.

On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 11:30:54 AM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote:
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 10:25:24 AM UTC-5, Lord Vath wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 09:16:35 -0600, Chris L Peterson
wrote this crap:

On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:23:23 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote:

Hillary set up an illegal server in her house and sent classified
information on it then tried to hide the evidence. If you or I did
that, we'd be wearing an orange pantsuit.

More imagined offenses like Benghazi. If you can't find a problem,
invent one and spend all your time blowing it out of proportion.

Four people were killed in Benghazi because Hillary would not allow
increased security.

You are not the judge and jury on this.

How many people were killed in the various embassy bombings while Bush was president? How many marines were killed in Beirut under the "leadership" of Ronald Reagan?

How many French Paratroopers of the MNF were killed?

How many people have died in the illegal oil war in Iraq thanks
to Bush-Chaney?

There have been no "oil wars," dufus.

Give it up Vath, your side has done far far worse.

The Benghazi incident happened in slow motion. There was time, but no action.

On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 11:49:24 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:34:11 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 11:17:37 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:44:14 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 9:45:03 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics.

And they are Democrats.

Mostly, they are southern Republicans.

No, they are inner-city democrats.

As education increases, voter turnout increases. As education
increases, progressive views increase.

As education decreases, progressive views increase.

As education increases, the
things Republicans push for lose. It's no wonder that a primary target
of Republicans throughout the country is quality education.

Do the inner-cities not have control of their schools?

On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 09:49:23 -0600, Chris L Peterson
wrote this crap:

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics.

And they are Democrats.

Mostly, they are southern Republicans.

No, they are inner-city democrats.

As education increases, voter turnout increases. As education
increases, progressive views increase. As education increases, the
things Republicans push for lose. It's no wonder that a primary target
of Republicans throughout the country is quality education.

The educated people I know are mostly conservatives.


This signature is now the ultimate
power in the universe

On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 11:37:20 AM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote:
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 10:34:14 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 11:17:37 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:44:14 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 9:45:03 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics.

And they are Democrats.

Mostly, they are southern Republicans.

No, they are inner-city democrats.

No, they are angry old ignorants like you

No, actually I always vote. I have voted in every primary, general, Prez and mid-term election since I was first old enough to do so.

The best way to get higher democratic voter turnout is to promise them free stuff and special favors.

On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 12:04:20 PM UTC-4, Lord Vath wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 09:49:23 -0600, Chris L Peterson
wrote this crap:

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics.

And they are Democrats.

Mostly, they are southern Republicans.

No, they are inner-city democrats.

As education increases, voter turnout increases. As education
increases, progressive views increase. As education increases, the
things Republicans push for lose. It's no wonder that a primary target
of Republicans throughout the country is quality education.

The educated people I know are mostly conservatives.

I would characterize peterson as mis-educated.

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:36:29 -0700 (PDT), Uncarollo2
wrote this crap:

Well, the debate is over. No mention of income inequality,
climate change, student loan debt, etc. etc. In the end
the powers to be will nominate the person most likely
to defend the interests of Big Oil.

What are the interests of Big Oil? Are they not trying to sell a
product at a decent price?

All the products you depend on, necessities and luxuries are dependent
on oil. Shipping, trucking, trains, and airplanes are dependent on
oil. And that's how they get to your home.


This signature is now the ultimate
power in the universe

On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:04:11 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote:

As education increases, voter turnout increases. As education
increases, progressive views increase. As education increases, the
things Republicans push for lose. It's no wonder that a primary target
of Republicans throughout the country is quality education.

The educated people I know are mostly conservatives.

Educated people would be unlikely to associate with someone like you.
That distorts your view of reality. The educated people you know are
the ones who made it to 5th grade. So yes, they're probably
conservatives.