|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PNN Fundraising
As soon as possible a fundraising will be launched based on PNN (Propulsione Non Newtoniana) with the title : “ Permanent human outposts on the Moon and on Mars through a non-missile propellantless space propulsion” PNN prototypes will be given as gifts to donors . PNN propellantless prototypes with relative manual and accessories to remove any doubt. Here any info about PNN : www.asps.it/another.htm www.asps.it/takeoff.htm https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
PNN Fundraising
On Monday, November 25, 2019 at 1:02:01 AM UTC-5, wrote:
As soon as possible a fundraising will be launched based on PNN (Propulsione Non Newtoniana) with the title : “ Permanent human outposts on the Moon and on Mars through a non-missile propellantless space propulsion” PNN prototypes will be given as gifts to donors . PNN propellantless prototypes with relative manual and accessories to remove any doubt. Here any info about PNN : www.asps.it/another.htm www.asps.it/takeoff.htm https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/ a ways Back, I designed a magnetic monopole drive. The solar magnetic field would propel a monopole surrounding the space craft. The basic relation allowing hope for making this craft is the rate of change of the polar gradients of the body. EM theory allows infinite gradients of the pole's magnetic field. In reality the gradients are finite in rate at the pole. So how to test for capacity to construct a monopole? I would propose a trial and error testing program. Many many designs of a charges antenna would be tested. Basically this is done by using many element assembles trials. Why would this attack be hopeful? Because virtual electric fields exist. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
PNN Fundraising
The government's been working on stuff like this for a long time, with nothing to
show for it. At least as far as we've been told ............. "Decades-old questions about the potential existence of fantastical anti-gravity propulsion technologies have resurfaced following the Navy’s own disclosure of encounters with unidentified aerial phenomena and our own original reporting on a series of bizarre patents assigned to the U.S. Navy that seem to defy our current understanding of physics and aerospace propulsion. While the discussion continues over whether any such technologies are feasible, the truth is that the theoretical concepts behind them are anything but new. In fact, the U.S. military and the federal government have been formally researching these radical concepts since the 1950s, and according to our own research, those efforts have continued on to this very day. In our dive into what seems like something of a bottomless rabbit hole of government studies into this exotic scientific realm, we have collected a body of research, news reports, and firsthand accounts. These establish the fact that the types of "anti-gravity", propellantless propulsion, and mass reduction technologies described in the Navy’s recent "UFO" patents are at least based on more than 60 years of peer-reviewed research conducted and published by the likes of the American Institute of Physics, NASA, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and the Air Force Research Laboratory." See: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...early-70-years |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
PNN Fundraising
On Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 11:30:09 PM UTC-5, wrote:
The government's been working on stuff like this for a long time, with nothing to show for it. At least as far as we've been told ............. "Decades-old questions about the potential existence of fantastical anti-gravity propulsion technologies have resurfaced following the Navy’s own disclosure of encounters with unidentified aerial phenomena and our own original reporting on a series of bizarre patents assigned to the U.S. Navy that seem to defy our current understanding of physics and aerospace propulsion. While the discussion continues over whether any such technologies are feasible, the truth is that the theoretical concepts behind them are anything but new. In fact, the U.S. military and the federal government have been formally researching these radical concepts since the 1950s, and according to our own research, those efforts have continued on to this very day. In our dive into what seems like something of a bottomless rabbit hole of government studies into this exotic scientific realm, we have collected a body of research, news reports, and firsthand accounts. These establish the fact that the types of "anti-gravity", propellantless propulsion, and mass reduction technologies described in the Navy’s recent "UFO" patents are at least based on more than 60 years of peer-reviewed research conducted and published by the likes of the American Institute of Physics, NASA, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and the Air Force Research Laboratory." See: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...early-70-years The recent UFO images are radar or visible light? Either way there are possible atmospheric conditions to explain them. Isolated surface storm formation are possible. As is a glowing storm cell. The rather small size of these cells is likely a rare condition, ergo rarely seen. It wasn't until 1995 when the radiation sprites were first recognized on the tops of some full blown huge nimbi. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
PNN Fundraising
On Monday, November 25, 2019 at 1:02:01 AM UTC-5, wrote:
As soon as possible a fundraising will be launched based on PNN (Propulsione Non Newtoniana) with the title : “ Permanent human outposts on the Moon and on Mars through a non-missile propellantless space propulsion” PNN prototypes will be given as gifts to donors . PNN propellantless prototypes with relative manual and accessories to remove any doubt. Here any info about PNN : www.asps.it/another.htm www.asps.it/takeoff.htm https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/ I looked at your references. They seem to lead back to the EMdrive. He has progressed to resolving the conflicting results of independent trials of his supplied cavities. Somebody requested a moon mission design using his drive. He created a very speculative performance theory of the drive. He claimed a drive capacity without testing a vertical launch rocket. Basically he relies on superconducting microwave power supplies. The basic failure is that all superconductors have a current limitation where it switches to non-superconducting. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
PNN Fundraising
On Friday, December 6, 2019 at 10:52:17 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2019 at 1:02:01 AM UTC-5, wrote: As soon as possible a fundraising will be launched based on PNN (Propulsione Non Newtoniana) with the title : “ Permanent human outposts on the Moon and on Mars through a non-missile propellantless space propulsion” PNN prototypes will be given as gifts to donors . PNN propellantless prototypes with relative manual and accessories to remove any doubt. Here any info about PNN : www.asps.it/another.htm www.asps.it/takeoff.htm https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/ I looked at your references. They seem to lead back to the EMdrive. He has progressed to resolving the conflicting results of independent trials of his supplied cavities. Somebody requested a moon mission design using his drive. He created a very speculative performance theory of the drive. He claimed a drive capacity without testing a vertical launch rocket. Basically he relies on superconducting microwave power supplies. The basic failure is that all superconductors have a current limitation where it switches to non-superconducting. I forgot the cavity itself is subject to shorting. At a certain level an actual electron arc occurs destroying the stable EM field. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
PNN Fundraising
Il giorno venerdì 6 dicembre 2019 17:24:54 UTC+1, ha scritto:
On Friday, December 6, 2019 at 10:52:17 AM UTC-5, wrote: On Monday, November 25, 2019 at 1:02:01 AM UTC-5, wrote: As soon as possible a fundraising will be launched based on PNN (Propulsione Non Newtoniana) with the title : “ Permanent human outposts on the Moon and on Mars through a non-missile propellantless space propulsion” PNN prototypes will be given as gifts to donors . PNN propellantless prototypes with relative manual and accessories to remove any doubt. Here any info about PNN : www.asps.it/another.htm www.asps.it/takeoff.htm https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/ I looked at your references. They seem to lead back to the EMdrive. He has progressed to resolving the conflicting results of independent trials of his supplied cavities. Somebody requested a moon mission design using his drive. He created a very speculative performance theory of the drive. He claimed a drive capacity without testing a vertical launch rocket. Basically he relies on superconducting microwave power supplies. The basic failure is that all superconductors have a current limitation where it switches to non-superconducting. I forgot the cavity itself is subject to shorting. At a certain level an actual electron arc occurs destroying the stable EM field. 2005 and less 50 watt of power http://www.asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4 this is better (2018) https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
PNN Fundraising
Il giorno martedì 17 dicembre 2019 16:31:37 UTC+1, ha scritto:
Il giorno venerdì 6 dicembre 2019 17:24:54 UTC+1, ha scritto: On Friday, December 6, 2019 at 10:52:17 AM UTC-5, wrote: On Monday, November 25, 2019 at 1:02:01 AM UTC-5, wrote: As soon as possible a fundraising will be launched based on PNN (Propulsione Non Newtoniana) with the title : “ Permanent human outposts on the Moon and on Mars through a non-missile propellantless space propulsion” PNN prototypes will be given as gifts to donors . PNN propellantless prototypes with relative manual and accessories to remove any doubt. Here any info about PNN : www.asps.it/another.htm www.asps.it/takeoff.htm https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/ I looked at your references. They seem to lead back to the EMdrive. He has progressed to resolving the conflicting results of independent trials of his supplied cavities. Somebody requested a moon mission design using his drive. He created a very speculative performance theory of the drive. He claimed a drive capacity without testing a vertical launch rocket. Basically he relies on superconducting microwave power supplies. The basic failure is that all superconductors have a current limitation where it switches to non-superconducting. I forgot the cavity itself is subject to shorting. At a certain level an actual electron arc occurs destroying the stable EM field. 2005 and less 50 watt of power http://www.asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4 this is better (2018) https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/ Permanent human outposts on the Moon and Mars published Dec. 18 2019 on Kickstarter https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...project_build# |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The second worst President ever is fundraising for ... | Hgar | Misc | 3 | August 30th 14 09:25 PM |
SETI@home says fundraising went well & Arecibo recorder coming in June. | Jason H. | SETI | 1 | May 17th 06 12:53 PM |
Hale-Bopp Co-Discoverer Announces Fundraising Campaign for Educational and Humanitarian Project | [email protected] | Misc | 1 | February 2nd 05 09:56 PM |
Hale-Bopp Co-Discoverer Announces Fundraising Campaign for Educational and Humanitarian Project | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 2nd 05 08:43 PM |
Hale-Bopp Co-Discoverer Announces Fundraising Campaign for Educational and Humanitarian Project | [email protected] | News | 0 | February 2nd 05 08:42 PM |