A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old November 20th 06, 08:50 AM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

From: Phineas T Puddleduck
Is there any limit to the depth of your stupidity?


Tell you what. Try to answer me without references to NASA. GWB. Sucks.
Blows. Racial epithets


And keep it below 2 paragraphs.


The primary topic and of most sub-topics have been clear enough.
Therefore, tell me something that I don't already know.

If you simply can't manage to improve upon the math or otherwise
constructively share and share alike, then simply don't bother yourself.
-
Brad Guth






--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
  #52  
Old November 20th 06, 10:24 AM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Bill Snyder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:50:32 +0000 (UTC), "Brad Guth"
wrote:

From: Phineas T Puddleduck
Is there any limit to the depth of your stupidity?


Tell you what. Try to answer me without references to NASA. GWB. Sucks.
Blows. Racial epithets


And keep it below 2 paragraphs.


The primary topic and of most sub-topics have been clear enough.
Therefore, tell me something that I don't already know.

If you simply can't manage to improve upon the math or otherwise
constructively share and share alike, then simply don't bother yourself.


You haven't posted any math; only delusions and bigotry. It would be
hard for anyone not to improve on your stuff, since it's pure ****.

--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
  #53  
Old November 20th 06, 01:52 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Phineas T Puddleduck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,854
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

In article
lgate.org,
"Brad Guth" wrote:

The primary topic and of most sub-topics have been clear enough.
Therefore, tell me something that I don't already know.

If you simply can't manage to improve upon the math or otherwise
constructively share and share alike, then simply don't bother yourself.


Did someone else type this for you? Thats almost lucid.

Or are you taking your meds?

--
Thermodynamics claims another crown!

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/heacon.html

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #54  
Old November 20th 06, 03:02 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
unsettled
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

Phineas T Puddledick wondered:

In article
lgate.org,
"Brad Guth" wrote:


The primary topic and of most sub-topics have been clear enough.
Therefore, tell me something that I don't already know.

If you simply can't manage to improve upon the math or otherwise
constructively share and share alike, then simply don't bother yourself.



Did someone else type this for you? Thats almost lucid.

Or are you taking your meds?


He started taking yours.

  #55  
Old November 21st 06, 03:37 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

"Bill Snyder" wrote in message


You haven't posted any math; only delusions and bigotry. It would be
hard for anyone not to improve on your stuff, since it's pure ****.


And this fine example of your all-knowing expertise and wisdom is
actually supposed to impress us Village idiots?

Why do you folks need my math that you wouldn't accept no matters what?
After all, you only accept whatever's NASA/Apollo certified and/or Old
Testament math.

BTW; what bigotry? (other than my being against the sorts of crime and
corruption that you folks see absolutely nothing the least bit wrong
with)
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
  #56  
Old November 21st 06, 06:40 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Phineas T Puddleduck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,854
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

In article
lgate.org,
"Brad Guth" wrote:


Why do you folks need my math that you wouldn't accept no matters what?
After all, you only accept whatever's NASA/Apollo certified and/or Old
Testament math.


Considering you claim that others math is wrong, it would help to see
exactly where we are going "wrong"

--
Thermodynamics claims another crown!

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/heacon.html

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #57  
Old November 21st 06, 07:45 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in
message news
Considering you claim that others math is wrong, it would help to see
exactly where we are going "wrong"


What "others math" are you talking about? (your's?)

But I'm not worng simply because of my weird or somewhat dyslexic
encrypted math. I may be in error a bit more than my fair share of the
time, but that also is not the same as being wrong.

If all that you know of was on a need-to-know or taboo/nondisclosure
basis; as such how smart or all-knowing could you and your math
possibly be?

Are you saying that only self taught individuals are smart enough for
your likes?
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
  #58  
Old November 22nd 06, 05:20 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Scott Hedrick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 724
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon


"Bill Snyder" wrote in message
...
You haven't posted any math; only delusions and bigotry. It would be
hard for anyone not to improve on your stuff, since it's pure ****.


Just remember, we haven't had a moon since it blasted out of orbit on
September 13, 1999. What we see now is just an Air Force illusion, created
to keep the jihadists from panicking...


  #59  
Old November 25th 06, 03:07 AM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

I guess an Earth w/o magnetosphere really doen't hardly matter,
especially since GW is going to make our one and only precious Earth
into an absolute living hell that's way too spendy before our frail DNA
gets TBI to death.

What a pathetic joke of what these extremely brown-nosed mainstream
status quo suck-ups are continually into. I suppose if their own Jesus
Christ showed up, in no time at all they'd have that pesky jewboy as
well as for any others of his kind situated right back on another stick.

Too bad that folks here in this Old Testament certified anti-think-tank
hell of their Usenet naysay land, of their continual denial upon denial
of whatever rocks their good ship LOLLIPOP until each and every one of
those rad-hard NASA/Apollo cows come home, whereas they simply can't
accept or much less allowing others to so much as hear of whatever's
within their very own physics and replicated science cards, as having
been telling us snookered fools and fellow village idiots about our GW
moon that's also here to stay until our sorry and otherwise dumbfounded
butts are summarily roasted.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...030201712.html
"The Antarctic ice sheet is losing as much as 36 cubic miles of ice a
year in a trend that scientists link to global warming, according to a
new paper that provides the first evidence that the sheet's total mass
is shrinking significantly."

I suppose the same environmental demise can be said of the Arctic ocean
and of the vast Arctic circle that's getting a little extra snowed upon
but otherwise melting into a thinner sheet of compacted dirty snow and
ice that's taking up far less cubic volume and rather clearly covering
less of the dark surface and ocean area than ever before recorded.
Greenland's loss of ice is simply taking away a little more of the same
dirty icing on the cake that's also going away for good.

The Antarctic may in places be getting a little thicker layer of
compacted snow and ice, which unfortunately isn't likely to translate
itself into even 10% the worth of the nearly 36 cubic miles (150e3 km3)
that's going away in the form of icebergs and surface melt-off
throughout each polluted year of humanity having added their best sooty
effort of an insult to the ongoing GW trend, that's actually unavoidably
derived primarily from our moon.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
  #60  
Old November 25th 06, 05:09 AM posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
The Ghost In The Machine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 546
Default Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon

In sci.physics, Brad Guth

wrote
on Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:07:23 +0000 (UTC)
lgate.org:
I guess an Earth w/o magnetosphere really doen't hardly matter,


In a way, you're right. An Earth without the magnetosphere would be
deadly during the daytime to all surface-dwelling life forms.

especially since GW is going to make our one and only precious Earth
into an absolute living hell that's way too spendy before our frail DNA
gets TBI to death.


Is it GW's fault, or the fault of all US citizens? Remember,
we elected him.


What a pathetic joke of what these extremely brown-nosed mainstream
status quo suck-ups are continually into. I suppose if their own Jesus
Christ showed up, in no time at all they'd have that pesky jewboy as
well as for any others of his kind situated right back on another stick.

Too bad that folks here in this Old Testament certified anti-think-tank
hell of their Usenet naysay land, of their continual denial upon denial
of whatever rocks their good ship LOLLIPOP until each and every one of
those rad-hard NASA/Apollo cows come home, whereas they simply can't
accept or much less allowing others to so much as hear of whatever's
within their very own physics and replicated science cards, as having
been telling us snookered fools and fellow village idiots about our GW
moon that's also here to stay until our sorry and otherwise dumbfounded
butts are summarily roasted.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...030201712.html
"The Antarctic ice sheet is losing as much as 36 cubic miles of ice a
year in a trend that scientists link to global warming, according to a
new paper that provides the first evidence that the sheet's total mass
is shrinking significantly."

I suppose the same environmental demise can be said of the Arctic ocean
and of the vast Arctic circle that's getting a little extra snowed upon
but otherwise melting into a thinner sheet of compacted dirty snow and
ice that's taking up far less cubic volume and rather clearly covering
less of the dark surface and ocean area than ever before recorded.
Greenland's loss of ice is simply taking away a little more of the same
dirty icing on the cake that's also going away for good.


The Arctic will not contribute to ocean rising.


The Antarctic may in places be getting a little thicker layer of
compacted snow and ice, which unfortunately isn't likely to translate
itself into even 10% the worth of the nearly 36 cubic miles (150e3 km3)
that's going away in the form of icebergs and surface melt-off
throughout each polluted year of humanity having added their best sooty
effort of an insult to the ongoing GW trend, that's actually unavoidably
derived primarily from our moon.
-
Brad Guth




--
#191,
Linux. Because it's there and it works.
Windows. It's there, but does it work?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Calendar - May 24, 2006 [email protected] History 0 May 24th 06 04:12 PM
Space Calendar - March 23, 2006 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 March 23rd 06 04:18 PM
Space Calendar - January 26, 2006 [email protected] History 0 January 28th 06 12:42 AM
Space Calendar - October 27, 2005 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 October 27th 05 05:02 PM
Space Calendar - February 25, 2005 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 February 25th 05 04:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.