EVIDENCE OF FOSSIL ON MARS BEING COVERED UP ???

Lin Liangtai of Taipei, Taiwan, one of few honest
AND courageous scientists in the world, posted
the following mesage to sci.physics (It certainly
deserves to reach a LOT more people, so I'll try
my best to oblige. -- Ed Conrad)

============================

Newsgroups: sci.physics
From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jul 6 2008 12:20 am
Subject: For vested interest and national interest,
NASA conceals most of the micrographs of Phoenix

================================

For vested interest and "national interest", NASA
is trying to conceal most of the micrographs taken
by Mars Lander Phoenix.

NASA has not released any micrograph taken
by the atomic force microscope on board Mars
Lander Phoenix.

NASA has released only three optical micrographs
since NASA tested the optical microscope on June
4 and reported no problem with the microscope.
Most of the micrographs taken by Phoenix have
not been released yet.

Could NASA be trying to avoid the discovery of fossils
on Mars? I suspected so, long before NASA blocked
me from its website. I expected so, long before I wrote
a google message entitled "NASA tries to wrap fire
with paper".

By now it should be clear to all keen observers why NASA repeatedly
reminded people that Phoenix was
not equipped to detect life, past or present, and was
not aimed to detect life. Any detection of past life
should pass the strictest test of denial by anyone.

Who stands to benefit from failure to find life on
Mars? NASA's vested interest does.

NASA is convinced T
hat the failure is in the national interest. Believe it or not, in the
next few days/weeks, NASA will convince the highest national leader
that NASA should not reveal all the micrographs taken
by Phoenix.

Mars Rovers Opportunity and Spirit have released
all their micrographs directly, without prior screening
by NASA. Now NASA thinks persons like "i" could
use the Phoenix microgragraphs to cheat the world
into believing there was past life on Mars and such persons could
jeopardize American national interest
with naked truth.

Mr. Bush and the general public could very possibly believe NASA..

Who cares about God and its naked truth?

==================================

A PREVIOUS POSTING BY LIN LIANGTAI

====================================

Newsgroups: sci.med
From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 3 2008 2:13 am
Subject: Ed's fossilized blood vessel found on Mars

NASA just released a micrograph showing a vessel-like object (Fig. 1)
in the scoop of Phoenix Mars Lander.

That object closely resembles blood vessel remains
found in a Carboniferous human calvarium fossil owned
by Mr. Ed Conrad of Shenandoah, Pennsylvania (Fig. 2
for comparison).

The amazing thing is these two fossils are wonderfully preserved for 3
billion years and 300 million years, respectively. Who can do that?

Fig. 1:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ph...RAC_SSI_PR_Sol

Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...328514833&p=36

===========================

Ed Conrad
http://www.edconrad.com

==============

A FEW NORTH AMERICAN NEWSPAPERS
CANADA
Brandon Sun, The
Brantford Expositor, The (Brantford, Ontario)
Brockville Recorder and Times
Calgary Herald (Calgary, Alberta)
Calgary Sun, The
Canada.com
Canada NewsWire (Ontario, Mississauga)
Canadian Press and Broadcast News
Canoe - "Canadian Online Explorer"
Cape Breton Post (Sydney, Nova Scotia)
Cranbrook Daily Townsman (Cranbrook, British Columbia)
Daily Gleaner Online (Fredericton, New Brunswick)
Daily Graphic (Portage La Prairie)
Daily Herald Tribune (Grande Prairie, Alberta)
Daily Miner & News (Kenora)
Le Devoir (Quebec, Montreal)
LeDroit (Ontario, Ottawa) (French)
Edmonton Journal (Edmonton, Alberta)
Edmonton Sun, The
eye Weekly (Ontario, Toronto)
First Perspective (Manitoba, Scanterbury)
Fort McMurray Today
Gazette, The (Montreal)
Gazette, The (Ontario, London)
Globe and Mail (Toronto, Ontario)
Halifax Herald Ltd. (Halifax, Nova Scotia)
Hamilton Spectator (Hamilton, Ontario)
Le Soleil (Quebec City) (French)
Lakeshore Advance (Grand Bend, Ontario)
Kamloops Daily News (Kamloops, British Columbia)
Kingston Whig Standard (Kingston, Ontario)
Kitchener-Waterloo Record, The (Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario)
La Tribune, Sherbrooke (French)
Le Matin (Quebec) (French)
Le Quotidien (French)
London Free Press (London, Ontario)
Merritt Herald (Merritt, British Columbia)
Muse, The (Newfoundland)
National Post
New Brunswick Times & Journal (New Brunswick)
New Winnipeg (Winnipeg)
Niagara Falls Review (Ontario, Niagara Falls)
North Shore News (Vancouver, British Columbia)
Nunatsiaq News, The (Iqaluit)
Oliver Chronicle (Oliver, British Columbia)
Ottawa Citizen Online (Ottawa, Ontario)
Ottawa Sun, The
Owen Sound Sun Times (Owen Sound)
Peterborough Examiner (Peterborough)
Plan败 Qu颥c (Quebec) (French)
Prince George Citizen
Prince Rupert Daily News (Prince Rupert, British Columbia)
Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph, The (Quebec)
Record, The (British Columbia, Gold River)
Regina Leader-Post
Saint John Telegraph Journal (Saint John)
Sault Star, The (Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario)
Telegram, The (Newfoundland, St. John's)
Timmins Daily Press, The (Timmins, Ontario)
Toronto Star (Ontario, Toronto)
Toronto Sun (Ontario, Toronto)
Vancouver Province (Vancouver, British Columbia)
Vancouver Sun (Vancouver, British Columbia)
Western Producer (Saskatoon)
Windsor Star [Windsor, Ontario]
Winnipeg Free Press (Winnipeg, Manitoba)
Whistler Pique Newsmagazine (Whistler)

MEXICO
Cambio de Michoacan (Michoacan)
La Chronica de Hoy
Diario de Chihuahua (Chihuahua, Chihuahua)
EL Diario de Yucatan (Merida)
El Informador (Guadalajara)
El Informador (Jalisco, Guadalajara)
El Siglo de Torreon (Torreó®¬*Coah)
Excelsior
La Jornada (Mexico City)
El Norte
El Sur de Campeche
Reforma
Tribuna de Campeche
Universal

The idea that NASA would suppress fossils on Mars - which would
guarantee budget increases for decades - is almost as funny as the
idea that only one person on Earth can look at the photos and see the
fossils.

were you ever called Brad?

On Jul 9, 7:24 pm, Matt wrote:
The idea that NASA would suppress fossils on Mars - which would
guarantee budget increases for decades - is almost as funny as the
idea that only one person on Earth can look at the photos and see the
fossils.

Mars is a faith-based failsafe kind of planet. There are no Mars
fossils, at least not officially, and that makes their Old Testament
mindset into a happy camper.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

wrote:

Lin Liangtai of Taipei, Taiwan, one of few honest
AND courageous scientists in the world, posted
the following mesage to sci.physics (It certainly
deserves to reach a LOT more people, so I'll try
my best to oblige. -- Ed Conrad)

============================

Newsgroups: sci.physics
From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jul 6 2008 12:20 am
Subject: For vested interest and national interest,
NASA conceals most of the micrographs of Phoenix

================================

Only place they are going to find fossils on Mars is if they drop a
lander in a trailer park...

On Jul 9, 9:31 pm, Bill H wrote:
wrote:

Lin Liangtai of Taipei, Taiwan, one of few honest
AND courageous scientists in the world, posted
the following mesage to sci.physics (It certainly
deserves to reach a LOT more people, so I'll try
my best to oblige. -- Ed Conrad)

============================

Newsgroups: sci.physics
From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jul 6 2008 12:20 am
Subject: For vested interest and national interest,
NASA conceals most of the micrographs of Phoenix

================================

Only place they are going to find fossils on Mars is if they drop a
lander in a trailer park...

A FEMA trailer park, as recently set up for those Mars survivors of
the great impact that terminated whatever life Mars once had to offer
as of a billion years ago. Better FEMA late than never.

Mars has been certified as Old Testament failsafe.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

Matt wrote:
The idea that NASA would suppress fossils on Mars - which would
guarantee budget increases for decades - is almost as funny as the
idea that only one person on Earth can look at the photos and see the
fossils.


If it had a atomic force microscope on board (it doesn't) what you'd be
seeing photos of would be be clumps of a few atoms or a molecule.
There'd be no way to determine if they were part of a fossil or not.
For microfossil hunting anything above around 1,000 x magnification
would be pretty much worthless, and a much lower magnification preferable.

Pat

On Jul 10, 1:08*am, BradGuth wrote:


Mars has been certified as Old Testament failsafe.

Unless it's full of pretend athiests.

Matt" wrote in message
...
The idea that NASA would suppress fossils on Mars - which would
guarantee budget increases for decades - is almost as funny as the
idea that only one person on Earth can look at the photos and see the
fossils.

I know. It's wonderful. Those who postulate these coverups have no idea
about the way scientists work, or how the actual process of science works.
If there were any real evidence of flying saucers, bigfoots (bigfeet?), life
on Mars - past or present - etc., there would be no shutting people up. The
discoverers would be howling from the rooftops to everyone who would listen.

On Jul 10, 5:55 am, eyeball wrote:
On Jul 10, 1:08 am, BradGuth wrote:



Mars has been certified as Old Testament failsafe.

Unless it's full of pretend athiests.

That's a good point, but even the most devout pretend-Atheists are not
likely good at holding their infidel breaths, nor are they any better
evolved with rad-hard DNA.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth