|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Boeing-Lockheed EELV Joint Venture
This is news. The new joint venture will be headquartered in
Denver, "with most engineering and administrative activities consolidated" there, but "major assembly and integration operations will be located primarily at Boeing's manufacturing and assembly facility in Decatur, Ala". I'm not sure what this means for Lockheed's Atlas production line. - Ed Kyle ------------------------------------------------ Press Release Source: The Boeing Company; Lockheed Martin Corporation Boeing, Lockheed Martin to Form Launch Services Joint Venture Monday May 2, 5:00 pm ET -- Lowers Cost to the Government -- Maintains Assured Access to Space -- Enhances Reliability -- Provides Full Cost Visibility CHICAGO, and BETHESDA, Md., May 2 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The Boeing Company (NYSE: BA - News) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT - News) have entered into an agreement to create a joint venture that will combine the production, engineering, test and launch operations associated with U.S. government launches of Boeing Delta and Lockheed Martin Atlas rockets. The joint venture, named United Launch Alliance, will reduce the cost of meeting the critical national security and NASA expendable launch vehicle needs of the United States. "It has become increasingly clear that an alliance of launch capabilities is essential to meet the space communications, surveillance and reconnaissance needs of the 21st century, and to assure access to space," said Lockheed Martin Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Robert J. Stevens. "This combination will permit our national customers to achieve their mission objectives while reflecting current budget pressures and providing the government with full cost visibility." "Both of our companies have developed versions of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) in collaboration with the Air Force and have flown them successfully," said Boeing President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer James A. Bell. "By joining together we are convinced that we can provide the customer with assured access to space at the lowest possible cost while ensuring enhanced reliability by eliminating duplicate infrastructure and bringing experts from both companies to focus on mission assurance." United Launch Alliance will be structured as a 50-50 joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin -- combining services currently provided separately by Boeing Integrated Defense Systems' Expendable Launch Systems division and by Lockheed Martin's Space Systems Company -- for launches of each company's respective rockets. Based upon initial estimates, annual savings to the government resulting from the combination are expected to be approximately $100 - $150 million. Michael C. Gass, vice president and general manager of Lockheed Martin Space Transportation, has been appointed United Launch Alliance president and chief executive officer and Daniel J. Collins, vice president Boeing Expendable Launch Systems will serve as chief operating officer. In addition, a Boeing executive will be appointed chief financial officer and a Lockheed Martin executive will be named controller at a later date. These leaders will report to a six-member board of directors, with each company appointing three directors. "The Lockheed Martin and Boeing employees who will be part of this new launch provider understand the enduring needs of our Air Force and NASA customers for mission success," said Gass. "They bring together a remarkable record of accomplishment in launching national-security and scientific space payloads." "The continued performance of Boeing and Lockheed Martin employees as a new team going forward -- from the engineering center to the factory floor to the launch pad -- will offer even greater reliability and mission assurance to the customer," said Collins. The agreement, which is subject to government and regulatory approval in the United States and internationally, also stipulates that the companies will immediately request an order from the U.S. District Court suspending all activity in the pending civil litigation related to a previous competition for launches under the Air Force EELV program. Simultaneous with the closing of the transaction, the parties will dismiss all claims against each other. "The mission of this joint venture is to reliably meet critical launch needs, so it is imperative that the two teams come together as one with all lingering issues resolved," said Stevens. "When agreement was reached to form this alliance, both parties agreed that they were ready to move forward with a clean slate and an undistracted focus on mission success." Under the terms of the joint venture, Boeing's Delta and Lockheed Martin's Atlas rockets will continue to be available as alternatives on individual launch missions. This will ensure that government customers are able to make decisions that meet the goal of assured access to space with two families of launch vehicles. Upon vehicle selection, the United Launch Alliance team will carry out the mission, including vehicle integration and payload processing. Lockheed Martin's International Launch Services (including Proton) and Boeing Launch Services (including Sea Launch) are not included in the joint venture. These entities will continue to sell launch services to non-U.S. government customers. Additionally, work the companies are performing independently in support of NASA-sponsored Space Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicle concepts for future space exploration initiatives will be excluded from this joint venture. United Launch Alliance headquarters will be established in Denver with most engineering and administrative activities consolidated at that location's existing Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company facilities. Major assembly and integration operations will be located primarily at Boeing's manufacturing and assembly facility in Decatur, Ala. As part of the joint venture, Boeing's and Lockheed Martin's launch facilities at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California will provide flexibility for meeting the requirements for East and West Coast launches. United Launch Alliance is expected to have about 3,800 total employees at sites in Colorado, Alabama, Florida, California and Texas. It is anticipated that consolidation of the two organizations eventually will result in the elimination of some undetermined number of positions. A range of services will be made available to support those employees transferring to new locations to work with United Launch Alliance. Completion of the transaction is expected in late 2005 at which time United Launch Alliance operations would begin. Morgan Stanley served as financial advisor to Boeing and JP Morgan served as financial advisor to Lockheed Martin. Safe Harbor Statement / Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements contained in this press release are considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and it is both companies' intent that such statements be protected by the safe harbor created thereby. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding: (1) the expected closing date of the transaction; (2) the expected costs savings arising out of the transaction; (3) the ability to quantify and demonstrate cost savings; (4) the complexities of successfully integrating two workforces; (5) the difficulty in retaining critical skill employees; (6) uncertainties involved in advanced technological products and services; and (7) future performance, reliability and mission assurance. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (a) the risk that the transaction may close more slowly than expected or not at all; (b) the risk that the cost savings arising out of the transaction may be less than anticipated, and (c) other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in each company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All information in this release is as of May 2, 2005. Both companies disclaim any duty to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, actual results or changes in expectations. Source: The Boeing Company; Lockheed Martin Corporation |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Kyle" wrote in news:1115070353.276943.85220
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: This is news. The new joint venture will be headquartered in Denver, "with most engineering and administrative activities consolidated" there, but "major assembly and integration operations will be located primarily at Boeing's manufacturing and assembly facility in Decatur, Ala". I'm not sure what this means for Lockheed's Atlas production line. Okay, my mind's boggled. The Boeing facility certainly has excess capability, but their equipment's designed for Delta IV's aluminum skin, not Atlas' stainless steel. Wasn't Delta II moved to Decatur as well? I wonder what this will mean for future hardware and heavy lift? Will there be a convergance of technologies, or will one of the two designs be selected? --Damon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Kyle wrote:
This is news. The new joint venture will be headquartered in Denver, "with most engineering and administrative activities consolidated" there, but "major assembly and integration operations will be located primarily at Boeing's manufacturing and assembly facility in Decatur, Ala". I'm not sure what this means for Lockheed's Atlas production line. snip press release Early 1990s: Air Force/Government: "It is strategic for us to have more than one EELV launch services provider." Boeing: "Okay, here's our Delta IV!" LockMart: "Okay, here's our Atlas V!" Air Force/Government: "One, Two... Hooray!" (time passes...) May 2, 2005: Boe & Lock's Mart: "Hi, we're your new one-stop launch services provider!" Air Force/Government, Reed S: "WTF?" -- Reed Snellenberger GPG KeyID: 5A978843 rsnellenberger-at-houston.rr.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Damon Hill" wrote in message 31... "Ed Kyle" wrote in news:1115070353.276943.85220 @z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: This is news. The new joint venture will be headquartered in Denver, "with most engineering and administrative activities consolidated" there, but "major assembly and integration operations will be located primarily at Boeing's manufacturing and assembly facility in Decatur, Ala". I'm not sure what this means for Lockheed's Atlas production line. Okay, my mind's boggled. The Boeing facility certainly has excess capability, but their equipment's designed for Delta IV's aluminum skin, not Atlas' stainless steel. Wasn't Delta II moved to Decatur as well? Atlas V booster has aluminum skin. You're thinking of the older Atlases with stainless steel balloon tanks. The Centaur stage is still stainless steel. Murray Anderson I wonder what this will mean for future hardware and heavy lift? Will there be a convergance of technologies, or will one of the two designs be selected? --Damon |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I wonder what Lockheed gets in exchange for dropping its lawsuit against
Boeing. Since this venture doesn't include commercial Atlas launches (or Delta IV, if any), it's hard to see what the savings are. Murray Anderson "Ed Kyle" wrote in message ups.com... This is news. The new joint venture will be headquartered in Denver, "with most engineering and administrative activities consolidated" there, but "major assembly and integration operations will be located primarily at Boeing's manufacturing and assembly facility in Decatur, Ala". I'm not sure what this means for Lockheed's Atlas production line. - Ed Kyle ------------------------------------------------ Press Release Source: The Boeing Company; Lockheed Martin Corporation Boeing, Lockheed Martin to Form Launch Services Joint Venture Monday May 2, 5:00 pm ET -- Lowers Cost to the Government -- Maintains Assured Access to Space -- Enhances Reliability -- Provides Full Cost Visibility CHICAGO, and BETHESDA, Md., May 2 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The Boeing Company (NYSE: BA - News) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT - News) have entered into an agreement to create a joint venture that will combine the production, engineering, test and launch operations associated with U.S. government launches of Boeing Delta and Lockheed Martin Atlas rockets. The joint venture, named United Launch Alliance, will reduce the cost of meeting the critical national security and NASA expendable launch vehicle needs of the United States. "It has become increasingly clear that an alliance of launch capabilities is essential to meet the space communications, surveillance and reconnaissance needs of the 21st century, and to assure access to space," said Lockheed Martin Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Robert J. Stevens. "This combination will permit our national customers to achieve their mission objectives while reflecting current budget pressures and providing the government with full cost visibility." "Both of our companies have developed versions of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) in collaboration with the Air Force and have flown them successfully," said Boeing President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer James A. Bell. "By joining together we are convinced that we can provide the customer with assured access to space at the lowest possible cost while ensuring enhanced reliability by eliminating duplicate infrastructure and bringing experts from both companies to focus on mission assurance." United Launch Alliance will be structured as a 50-50 joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin -- combining services currently provided separately by Boeing Integrated Defense Systems' Expendable Launch Systems division and by Lockheed Martin's Space Systems Company -- for launches of each company's respective rockets. Based upon initial estimates, annual savings to the government resulting from the combination are expected to be approximately $100 - $150 million. Michael C. Gass, vice president and general manager of Lockheed Martin Space Transportation, has been appointed United Launch Alliance president and chief executive officer and Daniel J. Collins, vice president Boeing Expendable Launch Systems will serve as chief operating officer. In addition, a Boeing executive will be appointed chief financial officer and a Lockheed Martin executive will be named controller at a later date. These leaders will report to a six-member board of directors, with each company appointing three directors. "The Lockheed Martin and Boeing employees who will be part of this new launch provider understand the enduring needs of our Air Force and NASA customers for mission success," said Gass. "They bring together a remarkable record of accomplishment in launching national-security and scientific space payloads." "The continued performance of Boeing and Lockheed Martin employees as a new team going forward -- from the engineering center to the factory floor to the launch pad -- will offer even greater reliability and mission assurance to the customer," said Collins. The agreement, which is subject to government and regulatory approval in the United States and internationally, also stipulates that the companies will immediately request an order from the U.S. District Court suspending all activity in the pending civil litigation related to a previous competition for launches under the Air Force EELV program. Simultaneous with the closing of the transaction, the parties will dismiss all claims against each other. "The mission of this joint venture is to reliably meet critical launch needs, so it is imperative that the two teams come together as one with all lingering issues resolved," said Stevens. "When agreement was reached to form this alliance, both parties agreed that they were ready to move forward with a clean slate and an undistracted focus on mission success." Under the terms of the joint venture, Boeing's Delta and Lockheed Martin's Atlas rockets will continue to be available as alternatives on individual launch missions. This will ensure that government customers are able to make decisions that meet the goal of assured access to space with two families of launch vehicles. Upon vehicle selection, the United Launch Alliance team will carry out the mission, including vehicle integration and payload processing. Lockheed Martin's International Launch Services (including Proton) and Boeing Launch Services (including Sea Launch) are not included in the joint venture. These entities will continue to sell launch services to non-U.S. government customers. Additionally, work the companies are performing independently in support of NASA-sponsored Space Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicle concepts for future space exploration initiatives will be excluded from this joint venture. United Launch Alliance headquarters will be established in Denver with most engineering and administrative activities consolidated at that location's existing Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company facilities. Major assembly and integration operations will be located primarily at Boeing's manufacturing and assembly facility in Decatur, Ala. As part of the joint venture, Boeing's and Lockheed Martin's launch facilities at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California will provide flexibility for meeting the requirements for East and West Coast launches. United Launch Alliance is expected to have about 3,800 total employees at sites in Colorado, Alabama, Florida, California and Texas. It is anticipated that consolidation of the two organizations eventually will result in the elimination of some undetermined number of positions. A range of services will be made available to support those employees transferring to new locations to work with United Launch Alliance. Completion of the transaction is expected in late 2005 at which time United Launch Alliance operations would begin. Morgan Stanley served as financial advisor to Boeing and JP Morgan served as financial advisor to Lockheed Martin. Safe Harbor Statement / Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements contained in this press release are considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and it is both companies' intent that such statements be protected by the safe harbor created thereby. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding: (1) the expected closing date of the transaction; (2) the expected costs savings arising out of the transaction; (3) the ability to quantify and demonstrate cost savings; (4) the complexities of successfully integrating two workforces; (5) the difficulty in retaining critical skill employees; (6) uncertainties involved in advanced technological products and services; and (7) future performance, reliability and mission assurance. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (a) the risk that the transaction may close more slowly than expected or not at all; (b) the risk that the cost savings arising out of the transaction may be less than anticipated, and (c) other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in each company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All information in this release is as of May 2, 2005. Both companies disclaim any duty to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, actual results or changes in expectations. Source: The Boeing Company; Lockheed Martin Corporation |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 03 May 2005 00:12:08 GMT, Reed Snellenberger
wrote: Boe & Lock's Mart: "Hi, we're your new one-stop launch services provider!" Air Force/Government, Reed S: "WTF?" Does this really come as such a surprise? With more and more businesses being absorbed into 'Big-Box' retail chains, this is merely another step in that direction. A misguided step, maybe, but not a trend-setting one by any assessment. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Murray Anderson wrote:
I wonder what Lockheed gets in exchange for dropping its lawsuit against Boeing. Since this venture doesn't include commercial Atlas launches (or Delta IV, if any), it's hard to see what the savings are. Maybe they get to skip devloping Atlas V Heavy - and get to divide the Delta IV Heavy launch services profits instead? - Ed Kyle |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Kyle" wrote in message oups.com... Murray Anderson wrote: I wonder what Lockheed gets in exchange for dropping its lawsuit against Boeing. Since this venture doesn't include commercial Atlas launches (or Delta IV, if any), it's hard to see what the savings are. Maybe they get to skip devloping Atlas V Heavy - and get to divide the Delta IV Heavy launch services profits instead? That was the first one that came to my mind. The others whe Is Lockheed having a hard time getting more engines from the Russians? If so a deal with Boeing would give them a bargaining chip. Lockheed wants to use 5 meter rockets for its next size up Boeing already has that. Lockheed might be able to get out of Vandenberg. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Douglas Holmes" wrote in message news:9DIde.326$8e4.98@trnddc09... "Ed Kyle" wrote in message oups.com... Murray Anderson wrote: I wonder what Lockheed gets in exchange for dropping its lawsuit against Boeing. Since this venture doesn't include commercial Atlas launches (or Delta IV, if any), it's hard to see what the savings are. Maybe they get to skip devloping Atlas V Heavy - and get to divide the Delta IV Heavy launch services profits instead? That was the first one that came to my mind. The others whe Is Lockheed having a hard time getting more engines from the Russians? If so a deal with Boeing would give them a bargaining chip. Lockheed wants to use 5 meter rockets for its next size up Boeing already has that. Lockheed might be able to get out of Vandenberg. Energomash is selling the engines for profit. This must be its biggest moneymaker. It's possible that Lockheed wants to get out of producing them in the U.S. Murray Anderson |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Damon Hill wrote: "Ed Kyle" wrote in news:1115070353.276943.85220 @z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: This is news. The new joint venture will be headquartered in Denver, "with most engineering and administrative activities consolidated" there, but "major assembly and integration operations will be located primarily at Boeing's manufacturing and assembly facility in Decatur, Ala". I'm not sure what this means for Lockheed's Atlas production line. Okay, my mind's boggled. The Boeing facility certainly has excess capability, but their equipment's designed for Delta IV's aluminum skin, not Atlas' stainless steel. Wasn't Delta II moved to Decatur as well? I wonder what this will mean for future hardware and heavy lift? Will there be a convergance of technologies, or will one of the two designs be selected? According to: "http://rockymountainnews.com/drmn/business/article/0,1299,DRMN_4_3747251,00.html" "The joint venture - to be named United Launch Alliance - will be headquartered at Lockheed's Waterton Canyon facilities in Jefferson County, the companies said Monday. ... It will result in a net increase of jobs at the sprawling facilities, although Lockheed will discontinue its half-century-old rocket production operations there." No more rocket production at Waterton Canyon. Wow. Lockheed opened a new production building there just a few years ago. But what is more amazing to me is that Lockheed is saying that Waterton Canyon will *gain jobs* by shutting down production in favor of serving as a headquarters. This seems symbolic of what is happening to U.S. industry in general - although production usually moves to China instead of Alabama. I wonder how many of those Atlas production workers who are offered the chance will give up their Colorado homes to move to Alabama. I've got to believe that joint production will have to lead to the elimination of certain EELV models. We probably are not going to see Atlas V Heavy, for example. We might see some of the EELV Medium designs dropped. - Ed Kyle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bechtel Nevada: Control of the World's Largest Nuclear Weapons Facilities | * | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 2nd 04 05:29 PM |
Lockheed: In The National Security Interest of America | * | Astronomy Misc | 4 | April 15th 04 06:30 AM |
Boeing Establishes Orbital Space Program Office | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | November 3rd 03 10:23 PM |
News - Boeing rocket contracts taken away - Reuters | Rusty Barton | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 25th 03 03:21 AM |
News - Boeing rocket contracts taken away - Reuters | Rusty Barton | Policy | 0 | July 25th 03 03:21 AM |