A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nasa scientist David Leckrone criticises plan to retire space shuttlefor 'inferior' rocket.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 26th 09, 01:53 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Nasa scientist David Leckrone criticises plan to retire space shuttlefor 'inferior' rocket.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sciencean...or-rocket.html

If they could only perfect a separable crew compartment for the
Shuttle for emergency egress...

I know the Constellation has far greater cargo capability, but so much
has been learned from and about the STS system. Maybe the way back to
the moon could be a space-station like structure, built by future
shuttles, for earth orbit to lunar orbit transit and return, on a
large, more than three or four person scale.


  #2  
Old May 26th 09, 10:13 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,312
Default Nasa scientist David Leckrone criticises plan to retire space shuttle for 'inferior' rocket.

I think until we can turn electrical energy back into fuel or the re entry
heat back into power its going to be a major dangerous element getting off
the planet and costly.

Maybe we could use those five segment solids to boost the Shuttles altitude
or ability to change orbit inclination.
Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________


wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sciencean...or-rocket.html

If they could only perfect a separable crew compartment for the
Shuttle for emergency egress...

I know the Constellation has far greater cargo capability, but so much
has been learned from and about the STS system. Maybe the way back to
the moon could be a space-station like structure, built by future
shuttles, for earth orbit to lunar orbit transit and return, on a
large, more than three or four person scale.




  #3  
Old May 26th 09, 01:53 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default Nasa scientist David Leckrone criticises plan to retire spaceshuttle for 'inferior' rocket.

On May 25, 8:53�pm, wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sciencean.../space/5374520...

If they could only perfect a separable crew compartment for the
Shuttle for emergency egress...

I know the Constellation has far greater cargo capability, but so much
has been learned from and about the STS system. Maybe the way back to
the moon could be a space-station like structure, built by future
shuttles, for earth orbit to lunar orbit transit and return, on a
large, more than three or four person scale.


probably easier to make shuttles unmanned, or limit crew to 2 with
emergency egress in disasters.

nasa needs to think out of the box, the box isnt its friend........
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Google and NASA pair up for virtual space exploration - space - 18 December 2006 - New Scientist Space [email protected] UK Astronomy 0 December 18th 06 10:24 PM
NASA scientist using rocket engine test stands to build self-sufficient sensors and systems Jacques van Oene News 0 August 6th 05 01:42 PM
NASA Starts Planning to Retire Space Shuttle Scott M. Kozel Policy 66 April 21st 05 10:05 PM
NASA Starts Planning to Retire Space Shuttle Scott M. Kozel Space Shuttle 58 April 21st 05 10:05 PM
David Tholen (NASA Scientist), NASA & 911 The Money-Power-Religion-Disaster Game The Bucchi Letter fresh Astronomy Misc 0 February 15th 05 06:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.