Photons move at " c * ( 1 - 1000^-1000 ) " in an _ Ideal _vac...

HJ What makes reflection such a bad theory is bouncing photons would
have to slow down,or lengthen their wave lengths. My "spin is in
theory" gives the true answer. Best to keep in mind photons can not
slow down. If they did then that begs the question. How did they get
back to 'c' ? Bert

On Apr 19, 6:18 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
HJ What makes reflection such a bad theory is bouncing photons would
have to slow down,or lengthen their wave lengths.


Why? It might be an instantaneous quantum leap reversal of the vector
component of their motion that is perpendicular to the surface off of
which they are reflecting. Waves like to reflect off surfaces.
Photons have a wave nature, so ...


My "spin is in
theory" gives the true answer. Best to keep in mind photons can not
slow down. If they did then that begs the question. How did they get
back to 'c' ? Bert


See:

http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/2...stoplight.html

Since scientists claim that photons have no mass, by F= ma it would
take zero force to get them back to c. So where's the problem?

Double-A

Double-A My spin theory does away with lots of ways we have to use to
show how reflection(bouncing of photons works.) It can't be done using
just one word. My theory can,and the word is "spin" Best to keep in
mind what Einstein said about theories being good. "They don't need a
lot of explaining Bert