|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt32 Planet Core Evidence #404 Atom Totality 4th ed
Chapter 32 Planet Core evidence Subject: cores indicate Sun-Earth twice as old as Jupiter-Europa; Atom Totality Theory Cores of planets and satellites tells us their ages and that Earth is twice as old as Jupiter or Io or Europa. I took a brief false turn in the roadway for evidence that inner- planets are 10 billion years old versus 5 billion years for outer-planets. A bad turn in the road because atmospheric science of the Solar System is not going to tell me much if anything about age. Instead of atmospheres, I need to get to the cores of these objects. Because the difference between a Nebular Dust Cloud theory versus Dirac Radioactivity as the creation of the Solar System would be registered in the core composition. It has been known for a very long time that the inner planets have dense cores and the outer planets have lighter cores. This is because Earth is 10 billion years old and Jupiter is a young object of 5 billion years old. Mars probably had a dense core as Earth but some collision, much like the Earth and Moon collision separated the core of Mars and we see it as the Asteroid belt. I was googling for evidence and data on the outer planetary cores: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001Icar..151..204K Unless I am reading that harvard report wrong, it says the cores of the satellites of the outer-planets are similar to the core of the Moon and about 1/2 the density of the core of Earth. So that Europa, Titan, Io and others are about 1/2 the core density of Earth core. So, backtracking, I should focus purely on cores of planets as the age reckoning of planets. What is the age of our Sun? Is it 10 billion or 5 billion years old? Well what is its core composition? Does it have a dense core and does it have alot of thorium and uranium? I am going to need to have to reconcile the idea that many Solar Systems have binary stars. So that most Solar Systems have to be at least 10 billion years old, so that 5 billion to give birth to one of the stars and another 5 billion for the binary star. What is the age of the Milky Way Galaxy? Is it 10 billion or 15 billion years old? The key is to measure core abundance for thorium and uranium. Zircon crystals can be a very excellent measure also. So, here, it is ironic that the present day astronomy community uses radioactive elements to date things, but that I use not these radioactive dates but rather use the abundance to date things. So where the typical astronomer takes a radioactive sample to the lab to date the specimen, I rebuke that dating and say that the astronomer should have collected data as to the abundance or lack of abundance of radioactive substances. So the present day astronomer is mistaken to think that dating of a sample by means of radioactivity gives a reliable date, whereas I contend that if the sample is of a large density of radioactive substances tells us more about the age of the object. Just knowing that Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars+Asteroids have twice the density of their cores compared to the Outer Planets and their satellites tells us that Earth is 10 billion years old and Jupiter is 5 billion years old. The Cosmos has layered ages where some stars are older than the recent Plutonium Atom Mini-Bang Accretion, so that where the oldest stars of 20 billion years old are of the Uranium Atom Totality and the newest accretion layer is only 8 billion years old (the Freedman vs. Sandage debate). Perhaps the best way of determining the age of Sun and planets and satellites in our Solar System-- their cores. Cores of stars become dense in iron as they age. So if you see a star with a large iron core, it is an old star. Likewise we can age Earth and Jupiter and Io if we know their core data. Now I am using this website for information on cores: http://www.nineplanets.org/sol.html And from my Harvard source which says that Jupiter's satellites are about 40% the size of Earth's core. Io core is huge compared to Earth. From that information I figured out that the Sun core compared to Earth core is a factor of 300,000 in size whereas Jupiter core (even though much is unknown and says about 10-15 Earth masses) is only a factor of 30 in size to Io. What that tells me is the Nebular Dust Cloud theory cannot cope with those figures. That if the Nebular Dust Cloud theory were true then the ratios of cores of Earth with Sun and Jupiter with Io should have been in somewhat agreement. About the only agreement we see in cores of the Solar System is that the Inner-planets cores are relatively the same, and that the Outer-planet cores are relatively the same amoung one another, and that the cores of the Outer-planet satellites are approx 40% the size of Earth's Core. So what the core data suggests is the age of the Inner planets and Sun are of the same age and twice the age of the Outer Planets and their satellites. That Sun and Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars are 8 - 10 billion years old and Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and their satellites are only 5 billion years old. Also, I want to say something that is pretty neat about the Growing Solar System theory in that it allows for the Sun to be younger, say 5 billion years old, yet Earth being 10 billion years old. That is a remarkable feature of that theory and where the Nebular Dust Cloud could never have accomodated. The reason Growing Solar System can have such a feature is because of Dirac Radioactivity. And I do not remember if I called the concept as "seed-dot" of the electron-dot-cloud. How our Solar System started was that Sun and Mercury and the other planets and their satellites were borne of a "seed- dot" which taps directly into the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and from which cosmic rays or gamma bursts from the Nucleus end up at this "seed-dot" making it grow. So it starts growing from a few rays and bursts and more are added to that seed dot. I called this concept in the 1990s as "neutron materialization" and later called it "dirac radioactive materialization". Our planet Earth, every day is bombarded from cosmic rays and gamma ray bursts. These are particles that came from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and created our planet and continues to grow our planet. But some planets like Jupiter seem to have a fountain of growth where Jupiter receives even more Dirac radioactivity and grows Jupiter faster than even the Sun. So in this vision of solar system dynamics, one planet can accelerate in growth while another has tiny growth. So one can envision how in this theory, Earth could be twice as old as the Sun, and where Jupiter could be growing exponentially faster than the Sun. Summary: Yes! indeed! the pattern of the cores of the Sun and Inner Planets compared to the cores of the Outer-Planets and their satellites suggests that the Inner Planets are twice as old as the Outer-Planets, so that Sun and Earth are 8-10 billion years old and Jupiter and Europa are 4-5 billion years old. Also, the cores should trashcan the Nebular Dust Cloud theory because proto-Jupiter as it was sweeping up the gases of the primordial Dust Cloud would not have a physics that allows for Europa and Io to have such a huge sized metal core. The metal in the dust-swath of the proto-Jupiter would have sunk into Jupiter, leaving any satellites that formed as impoverished of a dense core. And the Nebular Dust Cloud theory has never explained the obvious fact of the dense cores of the inner planets. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt34 galaxy evidence #383 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 28th 11 07:39 AM |
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 6th 09 08:29 AM |
organizing the evidence from Earth to furthest galaxy #161; 3rd ed;Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 21st 09 12:25 AM |
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 13th 09 04:00 PM |
where is the dark-matter, obviously, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality#127 ; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 7th 09 07:32 PM |