|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote:
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth was a topic about the alternative as to how this planet obtained that terrific moon, as well as started the last thaw from the very last ice age this planet w/moon is ever going to see. It’s also about what’s not depicted within those early cave paintings that matters. Here’s a somewhat better worded introduction to this topic. The early or proto-modern human species, as of their surviving during and obviously as of shortly after the very last ice-age this Earth w/ moon is ever going to see, as such were obviously extremely survival intelligent folks, meaning much better off at their surviving within that raw and often cold terrain than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated and technology assisted as any modern clothed plus well insulated and tool outfitted humans as of today could possibly muster. As for these early humans having such raw intelligence for their surviving, it seems they had often recorded in stone or via cave paintings as to whatever was of keen interest, or simply taking proper notice of whatever else was shock and awe worthy about their extensively snow and icy covered era (especially if going by those crystal clear nighttimes), that was thawing out and subsequently flooding most everything in sight for the very last ice-age time. However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP or even of somewhat more recent times, there simply was not an era of artistic notations on behalf of depicting anything moon like until some time after 12,500 BP when humans had taken notice of significant ocean tidal issues, of seasonal tilt variations worthy of their having to migrate, and of otherwise absolutely nothing prior as having ever been recorded or otherwise noted as to their environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night, as though nearly as crystal clear as by day except without benefit of any heat influx, whereas you’d think this would be worth some kind of record. It’s almost as though Earth’s ice-age environment was always clouded over, or that such humans were semi-blind as having been surviving within a nearly monoseason w/o moon, whereas there simply are no such graphic accountings as to any extended nighttime of winter, or of those much shorter nighttimes of summer, much less of their ever having noticed tidal issues or having that absolutely impressive moonshine by night to better see and thus hunt, gather and survive by, especially weird if knowing they’d have that vibrant moon to light their way. Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having depicted their local environment, as having recording anything that truly mattered, whereas such you’d have to rethink as to why such intelligent and highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded any mention of seasonal changes, ocean tides and of that terrifically big old and extremely bright looking moon of ours, that which at winter/ ice-age times would have been unavoidably made to look extra bright by way of the added 10+ points worth of Earth’s icy and snowy albedo. What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit about our passive sun simply didn’t have that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP? (wouldn’t Earth as a whole be a whole lot colder, unless a second sun became available) Why as of today are such public owned supercomputers and of their highly capable simulations on behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best available science, as such being continually made so off-limits, as though our best research technology is forever sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure rated? . – Brad Guth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
Apparently the DARPA mainstream status quo isn't allowed to ponder as
to whatever smacked into our moon South Pole, as having created that absolutely horrific though shallow Aitken Basin. Any hope of running off those really good 3D interactive supercomputer simulations is taboo/nondisclosure rated, as though there's something to hide. Same goes for the planet Venus and the Sirius stat/solar system is absolutely off-limits, whereas tidal forces and a good many other laws of physics simply do not apply. Go figure, as to why is JAXA/Selene has been sequestered in the nearest DARPA/NASA space- toilet. . - . Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth On Jun 1, 8:45 am, BradGuth wrote: On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote: Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth was a topic about the alternative as to how this planet obtained that terrific moon, as well as started the last thaw from the very last ice age this planet w/moon is ever going to see. It’s also about what’s not depicted within those early cave paintings that matters. Here’s a somewhat better worded introduction to this topic. The early or proto-modern human species, as of their surviving during and obviously as of shortly after the very last ice-age this Earth w/ moon is ever going to see, as such were obviously extremely survival intelligent folks, meaning much better off at their surviving within that raw and often cold terrain than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated and technology assisted as any modern clothed plus well insulated and tool outfitted humans as of today could possibly muster. As for these early humans having such raw intelligence for their surviving, it seems they had often recorded in stone or via cave paintings as to whatever was of keen interest, or simply taking proper notice of whatever else was shock and awe worthy about their extensively snow and icy covered era (especially if going by those crystal clear nighttimes), that was thawing out and subsequently flooding most everything in sight for the very last ice-age time. However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP or even of somewhat more recent times, there simply was not an era of artistic notations on behalf of depicting anything moon like until some time after 12,500 BP when humans had taken notice of significant ocean tidal issues, of seasonal tilt variations worthy of their having to migrate, and of otherwise absolutely nothing prior as having ever been recorded or otherwise noted as to their environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night, as though nearly as crystal clear as by day except without benefit of any heat influx, whereas you’d think this would be worth some kind of record. It’s almost as though Earth’s ice-age environment was always clouded over, or that such humans were semi-blind as having been surviving within a nearly monoseason w/o moon, whereas there simply are no such graphic accountings as to any extended nighttime of winter, or of those much shorter nighttimes of summer, much less of their ever having noticed tidal issues or having that absolutely impressive moonshine by night to better see and thus hunt, gather and survive by, especially weird if knowing they’d have that vibrant moon to light their way. Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having depicted their local environment, as having recording anything that truly mattered, whereas such you’d have to rethink as to why such intelligent and highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded any mention of seasonal changes, ocean tides and of that terrifically big old and extremely bright looking moon of ours, that which at winter/ ice-age times would have been unavoidably made to look extra bright by way of the added 10+ points worth of Earth’s icy and snowy albedo. What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit about our passive sun simply didn’t have that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP? (wouldn’t Earth as a whole be a whole lot colder, unless a second sun became available) Why as of today are such public owned supercomputers and of their highly capable simulations on behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best available science, as such being continually made so off-limits, as though our best research technology is forever sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure rated? . – Brad Guth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
Perhaps our spendy public supercomputers are better used for
simulating live smut, rather than upon real observed formations and of those likely interactions of planets and icy proto-moons, especially of any such tidal interactions between nearby stars that are still if not forever associated with one another, one of which being an impressive binary star system as having somewhat recently lost 4+ solar mass in addition to having lost its tidal grip on any number of its planets and planetoid/moon like items. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth On Jun 4, 6:41 am, BradGuth wrote: Apparently the DARPA mainstream status quo isn't allowed to ponder as to whatever smacked into our moon South Pole, as having created that absolutely horrific though shallow Aitken Basin. Any hope of running off those really good 3D interactive supercomputer simulations is taboo/nondisclosure rated, as though there's something to hide. Same goes for the planet Venus and the Sirius stat/solar system is absolutely off-limits, whereas tidal forces and a good many other laws of physics simply do not apply. Go figure, as to why is JAXA/Selene has been sequestered in the nearest DARPA/NASA space- toilet. . - . Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth On Jun 1, 8:45 am, BradGuth wrote: On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote: Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth was a topic about the alternative as to how this planet obtained that terrific moon, as well as started the last thaw from the very last ice age this planet w/moon is ever going to see. It’s also about what’s not depicted within those early cave paintings that matters. Here’s a somewhat better worded introduction to this topic. The early or proto-modern human species, as of their surviving during and obviously as of shortly after the very last ice-age this Earth w/ moon is ever going to see, as such were obviously extremely survival intelligent folks, meaning much better off at their surviving within that raw and often cold terrain than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated and technology assisted as any modern clothed plus well insulated and tool outfitted humans as of today could possibly muster. As for these early humans having such raw intelligence for their surviving, it seems they had often recorded in stone or via cave paintings as to whatever was of keen interest, or simply taking proper notice of whatever else was shock and awe worthy about their extensively snow and icy covered era (especially if going by those crystal clear nighttimes), that was thawing out and subsequently flooding most everything in sight for the very last ice-age time. However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP or even of somewhat more recent times, there simply was not an era of artistic notations on behalf of depicting anything moon like until some time after 12,500 BP when humans had taken notice of significant ocean tidal issues, of seasonal tilt variations worthy of their having to migrate, and of otherwise absolutely nothing prior as having ever been recorded or otherwise noted as to their environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night, as though nearly as crystal clear as by day except without benefit of any heat influx, whereas you’d think this would be worth some kind of record. It’s almost as though Earth’s ice-age environment was always clouded over, or that such humans were semi-blind as having been surviving within a nearly monoseason w/o moon, whereas there simply are no such graphic accountings as to any extended nighttime of winter, or of those much shorter nighttimes of summer, much less of their ever having noticed tidal issues or having that absolutely impressive moonshine by night to better see and thus hunt, gather and survive by, especially weird if knowing they’d have that vibrant moon to light their way. Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having depicted their local environment, as having recording anything that truly mattered, whereas such you’d have to rethink as to why such intelligent and highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded any mention of seasonal changes, ocean tides and of that terrifically big old and extremely bright looking moon of ours, that which at winter/ ice-age times would have been unavoidably made to look extra bright by way of the added 10+ points worth of Earth’s icy and snowy albedo. What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit about our passive sun simply didn’t have that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP? (wouldn’t Earth as a whole be a whole lot colder, unless a second sun became available) Why as of today are such public owned supercomputers and of their highly capable simulations on behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best available science, as such being continually made so off-limits, as though our best research technology is forever sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure rated? . – Brad Guth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
Newsgroups DARPA wants nothing to do with this topic. Figures,
doesn't it. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote: Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
BradGuth wrote:
On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote: Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth was a topic about the alternative as to how this planet obtained that terrific moon, as well as started the last thaw from the very last ice age this planet w/moon is ever going to see. It’s also about what’s not depicted within those early cave paintings that matters. Here’s a somewhat better worded introduction to this topic. The early or proto-modern human species, as of their surviving during and obviously as of shortly after the very last ice-age this Earth w/ moon is ever going to see, as such were obviously extremely survival intelligent folks, meaning much better off at their surviving within that raw and often cold terrain than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated and technology assisted as any modern clothed plus well insulated and tool outfitted humans as of today could possibly muster. As for these early humans having such raw intelligence for their surviving, it seems they had often recorded in stone or via cave paintings as to whatever was of keen interest, or simply taking proper notice of whatever else was shock and awe worthy about their extensively snow and icy covered era (especially if going by those crystal clear nighttimes), that was thawing out and subsequently flooding most everything in sight for the very last ice-age time. However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP or even of somewhat more recent times, there simply was not an era of artistic notations on behalf of depicting anything moon like until some time after 12,500 BP when humans had taken notice of significant ocean tidal issues, of seasonal tilt variations worthy of their having to migrate, and of otherwise absolutely nothing prior as having ever been recorded or otherwise noted as to their environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night, as though nearly as crystal clear as by day except without benefit of any heat influx, whereas you’d think this would be worth some kind of record. It’s almost as though Earth’s ice-age environment was always clouded over, or that such humans were semi-blind as having been surviving within a nearly monoseason w/o moon, whereas there simply are no such graphic accountings as to any extended nighttime of winter, or of those much shorter nighttimes of summer, much less of their ever having noticed tidal issues or having that absolutely impressive moonshine by night to better see and thus hunt, gather and survive by, especially weird if knowing they’d have that vibrant moon to light their way. Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having depicted their local environment, as having recording anything that truly mattered, whereas such you’d have to rethink as to why such intelligent and highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded any mention of seasonal changes, ocean tides and of that terrifically big old and extremely bright looking moon of ours, that which at winter/ ice-age times would have been unavoidably made to look extra bright by way of the added 10+ points worth of Earth’s icy and snowy albedo. What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit about our passive sun simply didn’t have that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP? (wouldn’t Earth as a whole be a whole lot colder, unless a second sun became available) Why as of today are such public owned supercomputers and of their highly capable simulations on behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best available science, as such being continually made so off-limits, as though our best research technology is forever sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure rated? . – Brad Guth let me ask you about what celestial mechanics is at it heart? mathematics is considered the queen of the sciences and she does not deign to relate to reality. but celestial mechanics is a very specialized kind of physics , a shirtsleeves approximation. mathematicians either wreck their ships on that rock or else avoid it like the plague... but it is all about describing the motion of objects. Newton was a twit, but a genius mathematical twit. I would accept being as crazy and religiosity burned as Newton but I am not and I cannot do the kind of mathematical reasoning he could do. he unified physics and mathematics. so well that it took 250 years to determine how he was wrong if at all. but he offered problems related to your thesis of a interloper moon. he considered the question of a limits of calculations. Roche looked at the same calculus and noted that beyond a certain radius (having to do with the mass of the primary) the interloper would be shattered. ( this same theory predicts things like Saturn's rings.) it all relates to the question of can a moon approach any significant body and not be shattered? Saturn says no. so the integral of ( c^2 * (2/r -1/a) ) has to do with the curvature of space. a technical Roche limit says there is a joint mass with a distance proportional to that mass the should any TWO masses approach the lesser and even the primary would be broken up. Brad describes the moon like a fractured billiard ball. it is fluid and fragile compared to a billiard ball. at planetary scales asteroids, moons planets and stars are all fluid. and that is why the largest are spherical. all these physical facts specifically indicate the Brad Guth is talking through his hat. josephus -- I go sailing in the summer and look at stars in the winter, "Everybody is ignorant but on different subjects" --Will Rogers Its not what you know that gets you in trouble its what you know that ain so. --josh billings. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
On Jun 6, 10:54 pm, josephus wrote:
BradGuth wrote: On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote: Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth was a topic about the alternative as to how this planet obtained that terrific moon, as well as started the last thaw from the very last ice age this planet w/moon is ever going to see. It’s also about what’s not depicted within those early cave paintings that matters. Here’s a somewhat better worded introduction to this topic. The early or proto-modern human species, as of their surviving during and obviously as of shortly after the very last ice-age this Earth w/ moon is ever going to see, as such were obviously extremely survival intelligent folks, meaning much better off at their surviving within that raw and often cold terrain than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated and technology assisted as any modern clothed plus well insulated and tool outfitted humans as of today could possibly muster. As for these early humans having such raw intelligence for their surviving, it seems they had often recorded in stone or via cave paintings as to whatever was of keen interest, or simply taking proper notice of whatever else was shock and awe worthy about their extensively snow and icy covered era (especially if going by those crystal clear nighttimes), that was thawing out and subsequently flooding most everything in sight for the very last ice-age time. However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP or even of somewhat more recent times, there simply was not an era of artistic notations on behalf of depicting anything moon like until some time after 12,500 BP when humans had taken notice of significant ocean tidal issues, of seasonal tilt variations worthy of their having to migrate, and of otherwise absolutely nothing prior as having ever been recorded or otherwise noted as to their environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night, as though nearly as crystal clear as by day except without benefit of any heat influx, whereas you’d think this would be worth some kind of record. It’s almost as though Earth’s ice-age environment was always clouded over, or that such humans were semi-blind as having been surviving within a nearly monoseason w/o moon, whereas there simply are no such graphic accountings as to any extended nighttime of winter, or of those much shorter nighttimes of summer, much less of their ever having noticed tidal issues or having that absolutely impressive moonshine by night to better see and thus hunt, gather and survive by, especially weird if knowing they’d have that vibrant moon to light their way. Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having depicted their local environment, as having recording anything that truly mattered, whereas such you’d have to rethink as to why such intelligent and highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded any mention of seasonal changes, ocean tides and of that terrifically big old and extremely bright looking moon of ours, that which at winter/ ice-age times would have been unavoidably made to look extra bright by way of the added 10+ points worth of Earth’s icy and snowy albedo. What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit about our passive sun simply didn’t have that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP? (wouldn’t Earth as a whole be a whole lot colder, unless a second sun became available) Why as of today are such public owned supercomputers and of their highly capable simulations on behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best available science, as such being continually made so off-limits, as though our best research technology is forever sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure rated? . – Brad Guth let me ask you about what celestial mechanics is at it heart? mathematics is considered the queen of the sciences and she does not deign to relate to reality. but celestial mechanics is a very specialized kind of physics , a shirtsleeves approximation. mathematicians either wreck their ships on that rock or else avoid it like the plague... but it is all about describing the motion of objects. Newton was a twit, but a genius mathematical twit. I would accept being as crazy and religiosity burned as Newton but I am not and I cannot do the kind of mathematical reasoning he could do. he unified physics and mathematics. so well that it took 250 years to determine how he was wrong if at all. but he offered problems related to your thesis of a interloper moon. he considered the question of a limits of calculations. Roche looked at the same calculus and noted that beyond a certain radius (having to do with the mass of the primary) the interloper would be shattered. ( this same theory predicts things like Saturn's rings.) it all relates to the question of can a moon approach any significant body and not be shattered? Saturn says no. The planet Jupiter says yes, and even within the Saturn rings are items going bump or lithobraking in the night, so to speak, without their shattering to bits. so the integral of ( c^2 * (2/r -1/a) ) has to do with the curvature of space. a technical Roche limit says there is a joint mass with a distance proportional to that mass the should any TWO masses approach the lesser and even the primary would be broken up. Brad describes the moon like a fractured billiard ball. it is fluid and fragile compared to a billiard ball. at planetary scales asteroids, moons planets and stars are all fluid. and that is why the largest are spherical. all these physical facts specifically indicate the Brad Guth is talking through his hat. josephus -- At least my hat that's covering my bald-spot is sticking within the regular orbital, mutual tidal radius and lithobraking laws of physics, such as the Sirius star/solar system having somewhat recently lost 4+ solar mass, and also why this conjecture or theory of mine is a bit more than complex enough to require a fairly impressive supercomputer set of simulations that you and others of your DARPA kind refuse to run. I noticed that you also haven't bothered to introduce any alternative notions as viable for having generated the South Pole Aitken basin. Is there a good reason for this? Sadly, yours and this following has been a fairly typical and thus counter-productive reply to my topic: He's going to claim the Moon only recently went into Earth orbit - a few thousand years ago, no doubt brought here by aliens. :-) So, then, the Moon was an alien nuclear waste dumping ground? That's actually entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. An icy proto-moon is also providing a darn good interstellar craft, as well as nicely thermal insulated and otherwise ideally shielded from cosmic and local gamma. Must also be the reason(s) why most everything of JAXA/Selene has become so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated. BTW, the 2e20 N/sec worth of holding onto our moon is always twice as tidal force worthy as our sun. If that mutual tidal force of 2e20 N/ sec were converted into hourly energy, it's absolutely impressive as all get out, even if only 0.0001% of that force--energy becomes worthy of global warming. If our trusty moon were to be relocated out to Earth's L1, and interactively kept there for obtaining roughly 3+% worth of solar isolation, as such we'd still have half the amount of tidal action to deal with. Because that relocated moon always being in alignment with our sun, those ocean tides would never change amplitude or their 24 hour cycle. If the moon were somehow to be eliminated, we'd still have roughly a third the tidal action, but at least our badly polluted environment would then be having a singular 24 hour tidal cycle that was always as regular as high noon, and lowest tides as regular as midnight, as well as Earth would be getting extremely cold from the inside out. Those supercomputer simulations would have easily proven all of this out, but sadly they are taboo/nondisclosure or simply DARPA need-to-know rated. It seems them nifty Google-Groups gold stars are no longer working, at least not for me. One of my lose cannons must have nailed their DARPA status quo (upsetting their apple cart or rocking their good ship LOLLIPOP). Of course few if none others were into giving out those gold stars, no matters how interesting the contributed topic or reply. When so much of DARPA/newsgroups are of such silly or intentionally misleading/diversion topics, it’s interesting how the really good topics or replies can’t seem to be given any of them Google-Groups gold stars. I wonder why them DARPA Gods of Usenet/newsgroups are upset enough to banish them gold stars. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 6, 10:54 pm, josephus wrote: BradGuth wrote: On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote: Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth was a topic about the alternative as to how this planet obtained that terrific moon, as well as started the last thaw from the very last ice age this planet w/moon is ever going to see. It’s also about what’s not depicted within those early cave paintings that matters. Here’s a somewhat better worded introduction to this topic. The early or proto-modern human species, as of their surviving during and obviously as of shortly after the very last ice-age this Earth w/ moon is ever going to see, as such were obviously extremely survival intelligent folks, meaning much better off at their surviving within that raw and often cold terrain than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated and technology assisted as any modern clothed plus well insulated and tool outfitted humans as of today could possibly muster. As for these early humans having such raw intelligence for their surviving, it seems they had often recorded in stone or via cave paintings as to whatever was of keen interest, or simply taking proper notice of whatever else was shock and awe worthy about their extensively snow and icy covered era (especially if going by those crystal clear nighttimes), that was thawing out and subsequently flooding most everything in sight for the very last ice-age time. However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP or even of somewhat more recent times, there simply was not an era of artistic notations on behalf of depicting anything moon like until some time after 12,500 BP when humans had taken notice of significant ocean tidal issues, of seasonal tilt variations worthy of their having to migrate, and of otherwise absolutely nothing prior as having ever been recorded or otherwise noted as to their environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night, as though nearly as crystal clear as by day except without benefit of any heat influx, whereas you’d think this would be worth some kind of record. It’s almost as though Earth’s ice-age environment was always clouded over, or that such humans were semi-blind as having been surviving within a nearly monoseason w/o moon, whereas there simply are no such graphic accountings as to any extended nighttime of winter, or of those much shorter nighttimes of summer, much less of their ever having noticed tidal issues or having that absolutely impressive moonshine by night to better see and thus hunt, gather and survive by, especially weird if knowing they’d have that vibrant moon to light their way. Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having depicted their local environment, as having recording anything that truly mattered, whereas such you’d have to rethink as to why such intelligent and highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded any mention of seasonal changes, ocean tides and of that terrifically big old and extremely bright looking moon of ours, that which at winter/ ice-age times would have been unavoidably made to look extra bright by way of the added 10+ points worth of Earth’s icy and snowy albedo. What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit about our passive sun simply didn’t have that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP? (wouldn’t Earth as a whole be a whole lot colder, unless a second sun became available) Why as of today are such public owned supercomputers and of their highly capable simulations on behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best available science, as such being continually made so off-limits, as though our best research technology is forever sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure rated? . – Brad Guth let me ask you about what celestial mechanics is at it heart? mathematics is considered the queen of the sciences and she does not deign to relate to reality. but celestial mechanics is a very specialized kind of physics , a shirtsleeves approximation. mathematicians either wreck their ships on that rock or else avoid it like the plague... but it is all about describing the motion of objects. Newton was a twit, but a genius mathematical twit. I would accept being as crazy and religiosity burned as Newton but I am not and I cannot do the kind of mathematical reasoning he could do. he unified physics and mathematics. so well that it took 250 years to determine how he was wrong if at all. but he offered problems related to your thesis of a interloper moon. he considered the question of a limits of calculations. Roche looked at the same calculus and noted that beyond a certain radius (having to do with the mass of the primary) the interloper would be shattered. ( this same theory predicts things like Saturn's rings.) it all relates to the question of can a moon approach any significant body and not be shattered? Saturn says no. The planet Jupiter says yes, and even within the Saturn rings are items going bump or lithobraking in the night, so to speak, without their shattering to bits. so the integral of ( c^2 * (2/r -1/a) ) has to do with the curvature of space. a technical Roche limit says there is a joint mass with a distance proportional to that mass the should any TWO masses approach the lesser and even the primary would be broken up. Brad describes the moon like a fractured billiard ball. it is fluid and fragile compared to a billiard ball. at planetary scales asteroids, moons planets and stars are all fluid. and that is why the largest are spherical. all these physical facts specifically indicate the Brad Guth is talking through his hat. josephus -- At least my hat that's covering my bald-spot is sticking within the regular orbital, mutual tidal radius and lithobraking there is that lithobraking again. it does mean anything it implies that stone can spontaneously stop -- which violates not only relativity and Newtonian physics. laws of physics, such as the Sirius star/solar system having somewhat recently lost 4+ solar mass, and also why this conjecture or theory of mine is a bit more than complex enough to require a fairly impressive supercomputer set of simulations that you and others of your DARPA kind refuse to run. this simulated refusal to believe BRAD the BOOB? does not suggest that we believe your speculations. I noticed that you also haven't bothered to introduce any alternative notions as viable for having generated the South Pole Aitken basin. Is there a good reason for this? why is an impact crater any more unbelievable than your explanation of billiard ball antics. Sadly, yours and this following has been a fairly typical and thus counter-productive reply to my topic: He's going to claim the Moon only recently went into Earth orbit - a few thousand years ago, no doubt brought here by aliens. :-) So, then, the Moon was an alien nuclear waste dumping ground? That's actually entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. An icy proto-moon is also providing a darn good interstellar craft, as well as nicely thermal insulated and otherwise ideally shielded from cosmic and local gamma. Must also be the reason(s) why most everything of JAXA/Selene has become so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated. just for the record our moon iIS an anomaly. our moon is a positive GIANT. the other moons including moons physically larger than ours are all tiny compared to their primary. our moon is not as dense as our planet. it also does not seem to have a molten core. it may have some iron but it is not molten. and the impact theory does predict that the moon would be made of mostly crustal materials. so you need to provide some verifiable predictions that can be tested -- or you are just blowing in the wind. BTW, the 2e20 N/sec worth of holding onto our moon is always twice as tidal force worthy as our sun. If that mutual tidal force of 2e20 N/ sec were converted into hourly energy, it's absolutely impressive as all get out, even if only 0.0001% of that force--energy becomes worthy of global warming. it has been known since the middle ages that the moon provides energy. the problem is getting the tide to extract that energy. If our trusty moon were to be relocated out to Earth's L1, and interactively kept there for obtaining roughly 3+% worth of solar isolation, as such we'd still have half the amount of tidal action to deal with. Because that relocated moon always being in alignment with our sun, those ocean tides would never change amplitude or their 24 hour cycle. rampant speculaation which ignores the necessary energy to move the 1.7E20kg moon from one orbit to another. If the moon were somehow to be eliminated, we'd still have roughly a third the tidal action, but at least our badly polluted environment would then be having a singular 24 hour tidal cycle that was always as regular as high noon, and lowest tides as regular as midnight, as well as Earth would be getting extremely cold from the inside out. Those supercomputer simulations would have easily proven all of this out, but sadly they are taboo/nondisclosure or simply DARPA need-to-know rated. If we removed the moon it would not change anything except the size of the tides. It seems them nifty Google-Groups gold stars are no longer working, at least not for me. One of my lose cannons must have nailed their DARPA status quo (upsetting their apple cart or rocking their good ship LOLLIPOP). Of course few if none others were into giving out those gold stars, no matters how interesting the contributed topic or reply. When so much of DARPA/newsgroups are of such silly or intentionally misleading/diversion topics, it’s interesting how the really good topics or replies can’t seem to be given any of them Google-Groups gold stars. I wonder why them DARPA Gods of Usenet/newsgroups are upset enough to banish them gold stars. I wonder if DARPA fired Brad and that is why he has a hardon for DARPA. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth josephus-- I go sailing in the summer and look at stars in the winter, "Everybody is ignorant but on different subjects" --Will Rogers Its not what you know that gets you in trouble its what you know that ain so. --josh billings. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
Your profound and insurmountable nayism is noted. Your lack of any
supercoumpter simulation is also noted. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth On Jun 7, 10:25 pm, josephus wrote: BradGuth wrote: On Jun 6, 10:54 pm, josephus wrote: BradGuth wrote: On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote: Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth was a topic about the alternative as to how this planet obtained that terrific moon, as well as started the last thaw from the very last ice age this planet w/moon is ever going to see. It’s also about what’s not depicted within those early cave paintings that matters. Here’s a somewhat better worded introduction to this topic. The early or proto-modern human species, as of their surviving during and obviously as of shortly after the very last ice-age this Earth w/ moon is ever going to see, as such were obviously extremely survival intelligent folks, meaning much better off at their surviving within that raw and often cold terrain than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated and technology assisted as any modern clothed plus well insulated and tool outfitted humans as of today could possibly muster. As for these early humans having such raw intelligence for their surviving, it seems they had often recorded in stone or via cave paintings as to whatever was of keen interest, or simply taking proper notice of whatever else was shock and awe worthy about their extensively snow and icy covered era (especially if going by those crystal clear nighttimes), that was thawing out and subsequently flooding most everything in sight for the very last ice-age time. However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP or even of somewhat more recent times, there simply was not an era of artistic notations on behalf of depicting anything moon like until some time after 12,500 BP when humans had taken notice of significant ocean tidal issues, of seasonal tilt variations worthy of their having to migrate, and of otherwise absolutely nothing prior as having ever been recorded or otherwise noted as to their environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night, as though nearly as crystal clear as by day except without benefit of any heat influx, whereas you’d think this would be worth some kind of record. It’s almost as though Earth’s ice-age environment was always clouded over, or that such humans were semi-blind as having been surviving within a nearly monoseason w/o moon, whereas there simply are no such graphic accountings as to any extended nighttime of winter, or of those much shorter nighttimes of summer, much less of their ever having noticed tidal issues or having that absolutely impressive moonshine by night to better see and thus hunt, gather and survive by, especially weird if knowing they’d have that vibrant moon to light their way. Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having depicted their local environment, as having recording anything that truly mattered, whereas such you’d have to rethink as to why such intelligent and highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded any mention of seasonal changes, ocean tides and of that terrifically big old and extremely bright looking moon of ours, that which at winter/ ice-age times would have been unavoidably made to look extra bright by way of the added 10+ points worth of Earth’s icy and snowy albedo. What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit about our passive sun simply didn’t have that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP? (wouldn’t Earth as a whole be a whole lot colder, unless a second sun became available) Why as of today are such public owned supercomputers and of their highly capable simulations on behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best available science, as such being continually made so off-limits, as though our best research technology is forever sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure rated? . – Brad Guth let me ask you about what celestial mechanics is at it heart? mathematics is considered the queen of the sciences and she does not deign to relate to reality. but celestial mechanics is a very specialized kind of physics , a shirtsleeves approximation. mathematicians either wreck their ships on that rock or else avoid it like the plague... but it is all about describing the motion of objects. Newton was a twit, but a genius mathematical twit. I would accept being as crazy and religiosity burned as Newton but I am not and I cannot do the kind of mathematical reasoning he could do. he unified physics and mathematics. so well that it took 250 years to determine how he was wrong if at all. but he offered problems related to your thesis of a interloper moon. he considered the question of a limits of calculations. Roche looked at the same calculus and noted that beyond a certain radius (having to do with the mass of the primary) the interloper would be shattered. ( this same theory predicts things like Saturn's rings.) it all relates to the question of can a moon approach any significant body and not be shattered? Saturn says no. The planet Jupiter says yes, and even within the Saturn rings are items going bump or lithobraking in the night, so to speak, without their shattering to bits. so the integral of ( c^2 * (2/r -1/a) ) has to do with the curvature of space. a technical Roche limit says there is a joint mass with a distance proportional to that mass the should any TWO masses approach the lesser and even the primary would be broken up. Brad describes the moon like a fractured billiard ball. it is fluid and fragile compared to a billiard ball. at planetary scales asteroids, moons planets and stars are all fluid. and that is why the largest are spherical. all these physical facts specifically indicate the Brad Guth is talking through his hat. josephus -- At least my hat that's covering my bald-spot is sticking within the regular orbital, mutual tidal radius and lithobraking there is that lithobraking again. it does mean anything it implies that stone can spontaneously stop -- which violates not only relativity and Newtonian physics. laws of physics, such as the Sirius star/solar system having somewhat recently lost 4+ solar mass, and also why this conjecture or theory of mine is a bit more than complex enough to require a fairly impressive supercomputer set of simulations that you and others of your DARPA kind refuse to run. this simulated refusal to believe BRAD the BOOB? does not suggest that we believe your speculations. I noticed that you also haven't bothered to introduce any alternative notions as viable for having generated the South Pole Aitken basin. Is there a good reason for this? why is an impact crater any more unbelievable than your explanation of billiard ball antics. Sadly, yours and this following has been a fairly typical and thus counter-productive reply to my topic: He's going to claim the Moon only recently went into Earth orbit - a few thousand years ago, no doubt brought here by aliens. :-) So, then, the Moon was an alien nuclear waste dumping ground? That's actually entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. An icy proto-moon is also providing a darn good interstellar craft, as well as nicely thermal insulated and otherwise ideally shielded from cosmic and local gamma. Must also be the reason(s) why most everything of JAXA/Selene has become so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated. just for the record our moon iIS an anomaly. our moon is a positive GIANT. the other moons including moons physically larger than ours are all tiny compared to their primary. our moon is not as dense as our planet. it also does not seem to have a molten core. it may have some iron but it is not molten. and the impact theory does predict that the moon would be made of mostly crustal materials. so you need to provide some verifiable predictions that can be tested -- or you are just blowing in the wind. BTW, the 2e20 N/sec worth of holding onto our moon is always twice as tidal force worthy as our sun. If that mutual tidal force of 2e20 N/ sec were converted into hourly energy, it's absolutely impressive as all get out, even if only 0.0001% of that force--energy becomes worthy of global warming. it has been known since the middle ages that the moon provides energy. the problem is getting the tide to extract that energy. If our trusty moon were to be relocated out to Earth's L1, and interactively kept there for obtaining roughly 3+% worth of solar isolation, as such we'd still have half the amount of tidal action to deal with. Because that relocated moon always being in alignment with our sun, those ocean tides would never change amplitude or their 24 hour cycle. rampant speculaation which ignores the necessary energy to move the 1.7E20kg moon from one orbit to another. If the moon were somehow to be eliminated, we'd still have roughly a third the tidal action, but at least our badly polluted environment would then be having a singular 24 hour tidal cycle that was always as regular as high noon, and lowest tides as regular as midnight, as well as Earth would be getting extremely cold from the inside out. Those supercomputer simulations would have easily proven all of this out, but sadly they are taboo/nondisclosure or simply DARPA need-to-know rated. If we removed the moon it would not change anything except the size of the tides. It seems them nifty Google-Groups gold stars are no longer working, at least not for me. One of my lose cannons must have nailed their DARPA status quo (upsetting their apple cart or rocking their good ship LOLLIPOP). Of course few if none others were into giving out those gold stars, no matters how interesting the contributed topic or reply. When so much of DARPA/newsgroups are of such silly or intentionally misleading/diversion topics, it’s interesting how the really good topics or replies can’t seem to be given any of them Google-Groups gold stars. I wonder why them DARPA Gods of Usenet/newsgroups are upset enough to banish them gold stars. I wonder if DARPA fired Brad and that is why he has a hardon for DARPA. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth josephus-- I go sailing in the summer and look at stars in the winter, "Everybody is ignorant but on different subjects" --Will Rogers Its not what you know that gets you in trouble its what you know that ain so. --josh billings. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin
On 8 juin, 08:12, BradGuth wrote:
Your profound and insurmountable nayism is noted. *Your lack of any supercoumpter simulation is also noted. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth On Jun 7, 10:25 pm, josephus wrote: BradGuth wrote: On Jun 6, 10:54 pm, josephus wrote: BradGuth wrote: On May 31, 9:09 pm, BradGuth wrote: Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pole-Aitken_basin *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aitken_clem_big.gif Our moon’s South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km in diameter is currently only 13 km deep (roughly 0.5%), offers a perfectly darn good example of the relatively shallow nature of such a horrific impact, as most likely moderated in depth due to the moon’s thick coating of surface ice that existed prior to the lithobraking encounter with Earth. Of several other largest of craters are those approximately 10% as impressive, or roughly 200 km in diameter, and equally shallow. Otherwise, if not having been protected by a thick layer of salty ice, I suppose those unusually shallow and oldest of moon craters are due to the unusually robust crust that is simply a whole lot thicker and more density substantial than anything terrestrial. In order to have produced the South Pole-Aitken basin of 2500 km by 13 km would also have required an impact with something of considerably larger diameter, such as Earth or possibly Mars got in the way before that moon arrived at encountering Earth. Once again, a good supercomputer could have nicely simulated this type of complex multiple encounter with such an icy proto-moon or icy planetoid that was merging with our solar system after being red-giant phase ejected away from the complex Sirius-A/B star/solar system that had recently burned through 5x worth of solar mass upon converting Sirius-B into that white dwarf (Sirius-A picking up one solar mass, leaves 4x missing in action). Of course, for all we know, Earth or at least Venus may also have been deployed into orbiting Sol by way of that same analogy of *the Sirius star system having lost those 4x solar mass, thereby losing it’s tidal radius grip on such planets and spare moons or planetoids. . – Brad Guth Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth was a topic about the alternative as to how this planet obtained that terrific moon, as well as started the last thaw from the very last ice age this planet w/moon is ever going to see. It’s also about what’s not depicted within those early cave paintings that matters. *Here’s a somewhat better worded introduction to this topic. The early or proto-modern human species, as of their surviving during and obviously as of shortly after the very last ice-age this Earth w/ moon is ever going to see, as such were obviously extremely survival intelligent folks, meaning much better off at their surviving within that raw and often cold terrain than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated and technology assisted as any modern clothed plus well insulated and tool outfitted humans as of today could possibly muster. *As for these early humans having such raw intelligence for their surviving, it seems they had often recorded in stone or via cave paintings as to whatever was of keen interest, or simply taking proper notice of whatever else was shock and awe worthy about their extensively snow and icy covered era (especially if going by those crystal clear nighttimes), that was thawing out and subsequently flooding most everything in sight for the very last ice-age time. However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP or even of somewhat more recent times, there simply was not an era of artistic notations on behalf of depicting anything moon like until some time after 12,500 BP when humans had taken notice of significant ocean tidal issues, of seasonal tilt variations worthy of their having to migrate, and of otherwise absolutely nothing prior as having ever been recorded or otherwise noted as to their environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night, as though nearly as crystal clear as by day except without benefit of any heat influx, whereas you’d think this would be worth some kind of record. It’s almost as though Earth’s ice-age environment was always clouded over, or that such humans were semi-blind as having been surviving within a nearly monoseason w/o moon, whereas there simply are no such graphic accountings as to any extended nighttime of winter, or of those much shorter nighttimes of summer, much less of their ever having noticed tidal issues or having that absolutely impressive moonshine by night to better see and thus hunt, gather and survive by, especially weird if knowing they’d have that vibrant moon to light their way. Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having depicted their local environment, as having recording anything that truly mattered, whereas such you’d have to rethink as to why such intelligent and highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded any mention of seasonal changes, ocean tides and of that terrifically big old and extremely bright looking moon of ours, that which at winter/ ice-age times would have been unavoidably made to look extra bright by way of the added 10+ points worth of Earth’s icy and snowy albedo. What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit about our passive sun simply didn’t have that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP? (wouldn’t Earth as a whole be a whole lot colder, unless a second sun became available) Why as of today are such public owned supercomputers and of their highly capable simulations on behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best available science, as such being continually made so off-limits, as though our best research technology is forever sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure rated? . – Brad Guth * let me ask you about what celestial mechanics is at it heart? mathematics is considered the queen of the sciences and she does not deign to relate to reality. *but *celestial mechanics is a very specialized kind of physics , a shirtsleeves *approximation. mathematicians *either wreck their ships on that rock or else avoid it like the plague... * but it is all about describing *the motion of objects. * Newton was a twit, but a genius mathematical twit. * I would accept being as crazy and religiosity burned as Newton but I am not and I cannot do the kind of mathematical reasoning he could do. he unified physics and mathematics. *so well that it took 250 years to determine how he was wrong if at all. * *but he offered problems related to your thesis of a interloper moon. *he considered the question of a limits of calculations. * Roche *looked at the same calculus and noted that beyond a certain radius (having to do with the mass of the primary) *the interloper would be shattered. * ( this same theory predicts *things like Saturn's rings.) * it all relates to the question of can a moon approach any significant body and not be shattered? *Saturn says no.. The planet Jupiter says yes, and even within the Saturn rings are items going bump or lithobraking in the night, so to speak, without their shattering to bits. so the integral of ( c^2 * (2/r -1/a) ) has to do with the curvature of space. *a technical Roche limit says there is a joint mass *with a distance proportional to that mass the should any TWO masses approach the lesser and even the primary would be broken up. Brad describes the moon like a fractured billiard ball. * it is fluid and fragile *compared to a billiard ball. *at planetary scales asteroids, moons planets and stars are all fluid. and that is why the largest are spherical. * * all these physical facts specifically indicate the Brad Guth is talking through his hat. josephus -- At least my hat that's covering my bald-spot is sticking within the regular orbital, mutual tidal radius and lithobraking * * there is that lithobraking again. * it does mean anything *it implies that stone can spontaneously stop -- which violates not only relativity and Newtonian physics. laws of physics, such as the Sirius star/solar system having somewhat recently lost 4+ solar mass, and also why this conjecture or theory of mine is a bit more than complex enough to require a fairly impressive supercomputer set of simulations that you and others of your DARPA kind refuse to run. * * this simulated refusal to believe BRAD the BOOB? *does not suggest that we believe your speculations. I noticed that you also haven't bothered to introduce any alternative notions as viable for having generated the South Pole Aitken basin. Is there a good reason for this? * * *why is an impact crater any more unbelievable than your explanation of *billiard ball antics. Sadly, yours and this following has been a fairly typical and thus counter-productive reply to my topic: He's going to claim the Moon only recently went into Earth orbit - a few thousand years ago, no doubt brought here by ... plus de détails »- Masquer le texte des messages précédents - - Afficher le texte des messages précédents - ... interesting deaf & dumb exchanges, all the more since that alleged attraction is just figment of mad imaginations as well that warped space, output indeed of schizophrenic minds unable to add a speed to another ! ( by ex. that Einstein plagiarist retard & Master of illusion) a) Underlying the crass lunacy (or lunarcy may be ) of that poor sod of Josephus & sundries is the fact all Orogenesis on Earth are resulting from direct Moon Earth hit, the last one leading to the surrection by hydraulic counter reaction of the Andes, Rockies , Canada craton ( yep Niagara falls and all major falls of the world) the Alps, the Himalayas etc ... a mere 11 700 years ago as the Academics frauds supporting present Geology are unable to see b) OF COURSE, the question of what is the motor of Earth Rotation & Earth Revolution, as well of course of all our Solar system's likewise motion + all Planetary Expansion in phase with it, is not considered nor addressed by the Universities mass-produced conditioned minds allegedly claiming being able then with their degenerate present "modern" minds to consider & hence bring answers to such nagging questions. No, this is impossible, since the pretension is that mathematical legerdemains ( as the late Henri Poincaré's E= Mc^2 equation, and claimed amongst others' by again the Einstein thief, attempted to prove ) can lead to a proper understanding, while in fact defining a virtual & impossible fiction with no relation at all to the real world. Only a correct understanding, prior to introducing computing, leads to an intelligence of our environment and hence to the True History of the Earth & our Solar System, with a direct relation of cause to effect whereby the observation of our Relief according to the True Geology ( based both on back engineering and on the UPL or Universal Pressure Law) is the key not only of our past but or our future.... with in our case an irreversible drift towards Mars and the exit hence from the Solar biological range ( accelerated by Global Warming indeed ) with a concomittent consequence to all other planets, as defined by the Titius-Bode law . In this light here a quote from previous answer to Dr Don Findlay, one of the greatest Geologic mind of the Southern Hemisphere indeed, which I consider quite appropriate : QUOTE The main problem is not only that Plate Tectonics theories, as you are demonstrating, are false but as well all the rest... You are addressing through the references to John Dewey & others the issue of the Human mind 's working ! But again these are symptoms but not as yet addressing the real cause. As well the motor of Planetary Expansion with its local case of Earth Expansion is not understood by Carey & sundries, hence the EE understanding although correct will not be accepted by the Establishment. The nagging question of course being that : Is the Western World hooked on the JIC (Judeo-Islamic-Christian ) sects underlying concepts able to understand the True History of Mankind and of the Earth. My answer is NO, and I am certain that only population free from such mental programming as the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans + a few others will be able to make the bound to a True Geology. Just like curing any type of cancer in 3 days flat and relief to brain tumour in a 2 hours is completely beyond the grasp of the present Dizzeaze Industry (DI) for which the Cancer business is the most juicy Cash flow indeed...Do you think as well that Mankind is able to understand & accept indeed that very simple concept which Cosmic Laws impose indeed since eons of time according to which, as I have resumed it succinctly : ALL DIZZEZEZZ ARE DEZERVED !!! Of course not... the dudes prefer to : TAKE FRASER'S WITH CONFIDENCE ! Fraser and sundries comfort the dizzeazed in the fact that their dizeazes are not their own fault ... Not so indeed according to Cosmic Laws. Chastiment is never being administered without reason indeed, ignorance being NO excuse ! The Geology Establishment stands on loose ground at the present time and proves itself an Academic Congregation of Clueles Universities Rabble indeed ( Curtin, Monash, ANU, etc ) ... and so does the Medical Establishment with its drug pushing industry !!! ... but so many unproductive, sterile & indeed parasites live on the system that none of that congregation want things to change indeed Hey ? ENDQUOTE With best regards to all honestly seeking minds Jean-Paul Turcaud Australia Mining Pioneer Discoverer of Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines in the Great Sandy Desert Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant Bus ph + 33 6 50 17 14 64 Founder of the True Geology ~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~ for background info. http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/nac.html http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Engineers Plan Possible Moon Base at the Moon's South Pole: On the Ice! | Double-A | Misc | 0 | January 2nd 07 12:46 PM |
If the Earth has a Ozone Hole at its pole, what does Mars have at ists pole? | S_chuber_t | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 8th 05 08:13 PM |
'Pole Stars' on the Moon? | JimO | Misc | 13 | December 19th 03 06:10 AM |
'Pole Stars' on the Moon? | JimO | UK Astronomy | 13 | December 19th 03 06:10 AM |
Earth Ejecta at South Lunar Pole | Arduin | Science | 1 | September 18th 03 08:10 PM |