|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the
ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
Hägar wrote: Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last month and it is only making news now. Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is monitoring the air for radiation daily. However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date. Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer, replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are ticking time bombs ready to break down. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
"Bast" wrote in message news
Hägar wrote: Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last month and it is only making news now. Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is monitoring the air for radiation daily. However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date. Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer, replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are ticking time bombs ready to break down. *** I'll excuse your ignorance when it comes to Nuclear Power Plants, since you obvious don't know **** from shinola. The older Chernobyl versions of Soviet Nukes didn't have an impact proof reactor containment structure. Hence, when they blew, it spread. We don't have any of that type. Or early ones were designed to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 747, probably in anticipation of 911 like events. So, perhaps the next time you open your big yap, read up on the topic at hand. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last month and it is only making news now. Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is monitoring the air for radiation daily. However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date. Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer, replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are ticking time bombs ready to break down. *** I'll excuse your ignorance when it comes to Nuclear Power Plants, since you obvious don't know **** from shinola. The older Chernobyl versions of Soviet Nukes didn't have an impact proof reactor containment structure. Hence, when they blew, it spread. We don't have any of that type. Or early ones were designed to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 747, probably in anticipation of 911 like events. So, perhaps the next time you open your big yap, read up on the topic at hand. Uhhh Right,....just like Three Mile island,......perfectly safe with no radiaton leakage at all. Or how about all the leaks from Indian Point just outside of NYC ? Both those plants are hopelessly outdated and still running, despite both were only designed to last in the 1990's You don't need to worry about something crashing INTO a nuclear plant,....you have to worry about the stuff inside crashing OUT. Before you keep proving that you are more ignorant than democrat sky screamers,.....you better remember that nothing crashed into Chernobyl, or Fukushima .....Just like nothing crashed into WTC 7 on 9/11,.....but the results were total destuction from within, in both cases. Sorry if that little fact doesn't fit your narrative. But hey,...what do I know. Why not watch a video about the newer nuclear technology that seems to have eluded you up to now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDCEjWNGv6Y A least if you can keep your head out of your ass for an hour to watch it. And quit reading government reports,....they still say that hitlery is as innocent as a spring lamb. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
"Bast" wrote in message news
Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last month and it is only making news now. Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is monitoring the air for radiation daily. However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date. Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer, replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are ticking time bombs ready to break down. *** I'll excuse your ignorance when it comes to Nuclear Power Plants, since you obvious don't know **** from shinola. The older Chernobyl versions of Soviet Nukes didn't have an impact proof reactor containment structure. Hence, when they blew, it spread. We don't have any of that type. Or early ones were designed to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 747, probably in anticipation of 911 like events. So, perhaps the next time you open your big yap, read up on the topic at hand. Uhhh Right,....just like Three Mile island,......perfectly safe with no radiaton leakage at all. Or how about all the leaks from Indian Point just outside of NYC ? Both those plants are hopelessly outdated and still running, despite both were only designed to last in the 1990's You don't need to worry about something crashing INTO a nuclear plant,....you have to worry about the stuff inside crashing OUT. Before you keep proving that you are more ignorant than democrat sky screamers,.....you better remember that nothing crashed into Chernobyl, or Fukushima .....Just like nothing crashed into WTC 7 on 9/11,.....but the results were total destuction from within, in both cases. Sorry if that little fact doesn't fit your narrative. But hey,...what do I know. Why not watch a video about the newer nuclear technology that seems to have eluded you up to now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDCEjWNGv6Y A least if you can keep your head out of your ass for an hour to watch it. And quit reading government reports,....they still say that hitlery is as innocent as a spring lamb. *** The difference is that when we have an event at a Nuke, there is an investigation and apropos measures are taken to eliminate a repeat in the future. If it is too slipshod, we close it down (see Rancho Seco, California). There are 100s more people killed in airplane accidents than there were at Three Mile Island ... it is hyperventilating ****s like yourself that, with false indignity, blow everything out of proportion, which, BTW, is also the hallmark of a ****ing Liberal. If you are afraid of getting fried by a Nuke, how about a outrage against automobiles, which kill thousands every year, or knives, od hammers, or railroad crossings, or ****ed off wives, or incompetent doctors .... but nooo ... Nuke owners usually have deep pockets and greed reigns supreme with you damn snowflakes. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last month and it is only making news now. Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is monitoring the air for radiation daily. However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date. Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer, replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are ticking time bombs ready to break down. *** I'll excuse your ignorance when it comes to Nuclear Power Plants, since you obvious don't know **** from shinola. The older Chernobyl versions of Soviet Nukes didn't have an impact proof reactor containment structure. Hence, when they blew, it spread. We don't have any of that type. Or early ones were designed to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 747, probably in anticipation of 911 like events. So, perhaps the next time you open your big yap, read up on the topic at hand. Uhhh Right,....just like Three Mile island,......perfectly safe with no radiaton leakage at all. Or how about all the leaks from Indian Point just outside of NYC ? Both those plants are hopelessly outdated and still running, despite both were only designed to last in the 1990's You don't need to worry about something crashing INTO a nuclear plant,....you have to worry about the stuff inside crashing OUT. Before you keep proving that you are more ignorant than democrat sky screamers,.....you better remember that nothing crashed into Chernobyl, or Fukushima ....Just like nothing crashed into WTC 7 on 9/11,.....but the results were total destuction from within, in both cases. Sorry if that little fact doesn't fit your narrative. But hey,...what do I know. Why not watch a video about the newer nuclear technology that seems to have eluded you up to now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDCEjWNGv6Y A least if you can keep your head out of your ass for an hour to watch it. And quit reading government reports,....they still say that hitlery is as innocent as a spring lamb. *** The difference is that when we have an event at a Nuke, there is an investigation and apropos measures are taken to eliminate a repeat in the future. If it is too slipshod, we close it down (see Rancho Seco, California). There are 100s more people killed in airplane accidents than there were at Three Mile Island ... it is hyperventilating ****s like yourself that, with false indignity, blow everything out of proportion, which, BTW, is also the hallmark of a ****ing Liberal. If you are afraid of getting fried by a Nuke, how about a outrage against automobiles, which kill thousands every year, or knives, od hammers, or railroad crossings, or ****ed off wives, or incompetent doctors .... but nooo ... Nuke owners usually have deep pockets and greed reigns supreme with you damn snowflakes. You sure argue like a snowflake. Never once adressing ANY of my points, just going off on a LA-LA-LA tirade of overused regurgitated talking points. I said that nuke plants never have leaks or meltdowns because of plane attacks. And that they are just too old, and literally falling apart. But no one wants to shut down the obsolete ones, and build far safer ones right next door. You went off on a tangent about banning cars knives doctors and od(sic) hammers. Although I noticed you missed "trucks of peace" GOD,...it makes me feel so good when I don't have to talk about Trump and then agree with you. ......BEING ON YOUR SIDE IN ANY ARGUMENT, SCARES THE **** OUT OF ME. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
"Bast" wrote in message news
Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last month and it is only making news now. Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is monitoring the air for radiation daily. However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date. Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer, replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are ticking time bombs ready to break down. *** I'll excuse your ignorance when it comes to Nuclear Power Plants, since you obvious don't know **** from shinola. The older Chernobyl versions of Soviet Nukes didn't have an impact proof reactor containment structure. Hence, when they blew, it spread. We don't have any of that type. Or early ones were designed to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 747, probably in anticipation of 911 like events. So, perhaps the next time you open your big yap, read up on the topic at hand. Uhhh Right,....just like Three Mile island,......perfectly safe with no radiaton leakage at all. Or how about all the leaks from Indian Point just outside of NYC ? Both those plants are hopelessly outdated and still running, despite both were only designed to last in the 1990's You don't need to worry about something crashing INTO a nuclear plant,....you have to worry about the stuff inside crashing OUT. Before you keep proving that you are more ignorant than democrat sky screamers,.....you better remember that nothing crashed into Chernobyl, or Fukushima ....Just like nothing crashed into WTC 7 on 9/11,.....but the results were total destuction from within, in both cases. Sorry if that little fact doesn't fit your narrative. But hey,...what do I know. Why not watch a video about the newer nuclear technology that seems to have eluded you up to now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDCEjWNGv6Y A least if you can keep your head out of your ass for an hour to watch it. And quit reading government reports,....they still say that hitlery is as innocent as a spring lamb. *** The difference is that when we have an event at a Nuke, there is an investigation and apropos measures are taken to eliminate a repeat in the future. If it is too slipshod, we close it down (see Rancho Seco, California). There are 100s more people killed in airplane accidents than there were at Three Mile Island ... it is hyperventilating ****s like yourself that, with false indignity, blow everything out of proportion, which, BTW, is also the hallmark of a ****ing Liberal. If you are afraid of getting fried by a Nuke, how about a outrage against automobiles, which kill thousands every year, or knives, od hammers, or railroad crossings, or ****ed off wives, or incompetent doctors .... but nooo ... Nuke owners usually have deep pockets and greed reigns supreme with you damn snowflakes. You sure argue like a snowflake. Never once adressing ANY of my points, just going off on a LA-LA-LA tirade of overused regurgitated talking points. I said that nuke plants never have leaks or meltdowns because of plane attacks. And that they are just too old, and literally falling apart. But no one wants to shut down the obsolete ones, and build far safer ones right next door. *** and once again your total ignorance is mind boggling. The reason Nukes are so expensive is because the labor unions run the place. Trust me, I've worked in them and I know. Something that is estimated to cost about 800 M (million) winds up over budget to the tune of 4 B (billion). So, after taking it up the pooper on the first one, nobody wants a repeat right next door, no matter how modern. And you can whine about my "talking points" all you want, the fact remains that Nuclear plants are any bit as safe as any other mode of electricity generation, but like in airplane crashes, if one goes, it creates a lot of collateral damage. But you little ****-ants, who see the Bushies behind 911, Trump in cahoots with the Russkies and Al "massage with happy ending" Gore as the shining salvation of humanity. Perhaps you need to attend the Liberals' howling gatherings and bay at the Moon at midnight. You went off on a tangent about banning cars knives doctors and od(sic) hammers. Although I noticed you missed "trucks of peace" GOD,...it makes me feel so good when I don't have to talk about Trump and then agree with you. ......BEING ON YOUR SIDE IN ANY ARGUMENT, SCARES THE **** OUT OF ME. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
Le 10/11/2017 Ã* 22:24, Hägar a écritÂ*:
Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ???Â* Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... that, it is the result of the ****ter of whore of **** of bitch of communism of bull**** of scumbag !!!! When everybody is a functionary, everybody don't give a **** !!!! We have seen the result with the USSR and Eastern Europe countries !!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
"Hägar" wrote in message ... "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last month and it is only making news now. Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is monitoring the air for radiation daily. However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date. Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer, replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are ticking time bombs ready to break down. *** I'll excuse your ignorance when it comes to Nuclear Power Plants, since you obvious don't know **** from shinola. The older Chernobyl versions of Soviet Nukes didn't have an impact proof reactor containment structure. Hence, when they blew, it spread. We don't have any of that type. Or early ones were designed to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 747, probably in anticipation of 911 like events. So, perhaps the next time you open your big yap, read up on the topic at hand. Uhhh Right,....just like Three Mile island,......perfectly safe with no radiaton leakage at all. Or how about all the leaks from Indian Point just outside of NYC ? Both those plants are hopelessly outdated and still running, despite both were only designed to last in the 1990's You don't need to worry about something crashing INTO a nuclear plant,....you have to worry about the stuff inside crashing OUT. Before you keep proving that you are more ignorant than democrat sky screamers,.....you better remember that nothing crashed into Chernobyl, or Fukushima ....Just like nothing crashed into WTC 7 on 9/11,.....but the results were total destuction from within, in both cases. Sorry if that little fact doesn't fit your narrative. But hey,...what do I know. Why not watch a video about the newer nuclear technology that seems to have eluded you up to now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDCEjWNGv6Y A least if you can keep your head out of your ass for an hour to watch it. And quit reading government reports,....they still say that hitlery is as innocent as a spring lamb. *** The difference is that when we have an event at a Nuke, there is an investigation and apropos measures are taken to eliminate a repeat in the future. If it is too slipshod, we close it down (see Rancho Seco, California). There are 100s more people killed in airplane accidents than there were at Three Mile Island ... it is hyperventilating ****s like yourself that, with false indignity, blow everything out of proportion, which, BTW, is also the hallmark of a ****ing Liberal. If you are afraid of getting fried by a Nuke, how about a outrage against automobiles, which kill thousands every year, or knives, od hammers, or railroad crossings, or ****ed off wives, or incompetent doctors .... but nooo ... Nuke owners usually have deep pockets and greed reigns supreme with you damn snowflakes. You sure argue like a snowflake. Never once adressing ANY of my points, just going off on a LA-LA-LA tirade of overused regurgitated talking points. I said that nuke plants never have leaks or meltdowns because of plane attacks. And that they are just too old, and literally falling apart. But no one wants to shut down the obsolete ones, and build far safer ones right next door. *** and once again your total ignorance is mind boggling. The reason Nukes are so expensive is because the labor unions run the place. Trust me, I've worked in them and I know. Something that is estimated to cost about 800 M (million) winds up over budget to the tune of 4 B (billion). So, after taking it up the pooper on the first one, nobody wants a repeat right next door, no matter how modern. And you can whine about my "talking points" all you want, the fact remains that Nuclear plants are any bit as safe as any other mode of electricity generation, but like in airplane crashes, if one goes, it creates a lot of collateral damage. But you little ****-ants, who see the Bushies behind 911, Trump in cahoots with the Russkies and Al "massage with happy ending" Gore as the shining salvation of humanity. Perhaps you need to attend the Liberals' howling gatherings and bay at the Moon at midnight. You went off on a tangent about banning cars knives doctors and od(sic) hammers. Although I noticed you missed "trucks of peace" GOD,...it makes me feel so good when I don't have to talk about Trump and then agree with you. ......BEING ON YOUR SIDE IN ANY ARGUMENT, SCARES THE **** OUT OF ME. ***You have to forgive Hagar. His electrical engineering duties surrounded sorting batteries into piles (e.g. AAA AA A C D 9V, etc.) He never read much about economics or he would understand that new nuke plants are not the least expensive means to produce electricity. Utilities have and obligation to their customers and investors. Notwithstanding wailing and mashing of teeth from whomever would produces a nuke plant and rightard ****weasles , utilities and turning from coal and nuke to natural gas and renewables. Not a US phenomenon. I understand Hagar converted his prize 1977 Vega to a coal powered steam engine and he heats his trailer with a pot bellied stove filled with cow patties. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Chernobyl deja Vu ???
Notroll2016 wrote: "Hägar" wrote in message ... "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message news Hägar wrote: Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb seriously ... I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last month and it is only making news now. Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is monitoring the air for radiation daily. However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date. Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer, replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are ticking time bombs ready to break down. *** I'll excuse your ignorance when it comes to Nuclear Power Plants, since you obvious don't know **** from shinola. The older Chernobyl versions of Soviet Nukes didn't have an impact proof reactor containment structure. Hence, when they blew, it spread. We don't have any of that type. Or early ones were designed to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 747, probably in anticipation of 911 like events. So, perhaps the next time you open your big yap, read up on the topic at hand. Uhhh Right,....just like Three Mile island,......perfectly safe with no radiaton leakage at all. Or how about all the leaks from Indian Point just outside of NYC ? Both those plants are hopelessly outdated and still running, despite both were only designed to last in the 1990's You don't need to worry about something crashing INTO a nuclear plant,....you have to worry about the stuff inside crashing OUT. Before you keep proving that you are more ignorant than democrat sky screamers,.....you better remember that nothing crashed into Chernobyl, or Fukushima ....Just like nothing crashed into WTC 7 on 9/11,.....but the results were total destuction from within, in both cases. Sorry if that little fact doesn't fit your narrative. But hey,...what do I know. Why not watch a video about the newer nuclear technology that seems to have eluded you up to now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDCEjWNGv6Y A least if you can keep your head out of your ass for an hour to watch it. And quit reading government reports,....they still say that hitlery is as innocent as a spring lamb. *** The difference is that when we have an event at a Nuke, there is an investigation and apropos measures are taken to eliminate a repeat in the future. If it is too slipshod, we close it down (see Rancho Seco, California). There are 100s more people killed in airplane accidents than there were at Three Mile Island ... it is hyperventilating ****s like yourself that, with false indignity, blow everything out of proportion, which, BTW, is also the hallmark of a ****ing Liberal. If you are afraid of getting fried by a Nuke, how about a outrage against automobiles, which kill thousands every year, or knives, od hammers, or railroad crossings, or ****ed off wives, or incompetent doctors .... but nooo ... Nuke owners usually have deep pockets and greed reigns supreme with you damn snowflakes. You sure argue like a snowflake. Never once adressing ANY of my points, just going off on a LA-LA-LA tirade of overused regurgitated talking points. I said that nuke plants never have leaks or meltdowns because of plane attacks. And that they are just too old, and literally falling apart. But no one wants to shut down the obsolete ones, and build far safer ones right next door. *** and once again your total ignorance is mind boggling. The reason Nukes are so expensive is because the labor unions run the place. Trust me, I've worked in them and I know. Something that is estimated to cost about 800 M (million) winds up over budget to the tune of 4 B (billion). So, after taking it up the pooper on the first one, nobody wants a repeat right next door, no matter how modern. And you can whine about my "talking points" all you want, the fact remains that Nuclear plants are any bit as safe as any other mode of electricity generation, but like in airplane crashes, if one goes, it creates a lot of collateral damage. But you little ****-ants, who see the Bushies behind 911, Trump in cahoots with the Russkies and Al "massage with happy ending" Gore as the shining salvation of humanity. Perhaps you need to attend the Liberals' howling gatherings and bay at the Moon at midnight. You went off on a tangent about banning cars knives doctors and od(sic) hammers. Although I noticed you missed "trucks of peace" GOD,...it makes me feel so good when I don't have to talk about Trump and then agree with you. .....BEING ON YOUR SIDE IN ANY ARGUMENT, SCARES THE **** OUT OF ME. ***You have to forgive Hagar. His electrical engineering duties surrounded sorting batteries into piles (e.g. AAA AA A C D 9V, etc.) He never read much about economics or he would understand that new nuke plants are not the least expensive means to produce electricity. Utilities have and obligation to their customers and investors. Notwithstanding wailing and mashing of teeth from whomever would produces a nuke plant and rightard ****weasles , utilities and turning from coal and nuke to natural gas and renewables. Not a US phenomenon. I understand Hagar converted his prize 1977 Vega to a coal powered steam engine and he heats his trailer with a pot bellied stove filled with cow patties. I'm more inclined to believe that hagars electrical experience was standing in puddles, and sticking his fingers in wall sockets to tell if the power was on. .....My guess is that he did it one too many times. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Japan has the next Chernobyl apparently. | [email protected] | | Policy | 97 | March 27th 11 06:17 PM |
Japan has the next Chernobyl apparently. | [email protected] | Policy | 1 | March 19th 11 12:06 AM |
Wet deja vu | Kent Paul Dolan | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 4th 07 10:13 PM |
Deja Vu | curlyQlink | Policy | 35 | August 23rd 05 09:25 AM |
Deja vu | Starstuffed | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | November 21st 03 12:39 PM |