|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein's Mistakes
Sue... wrote: Joe Fischer wrote:
On Thu, RP wrote: Make that zero *net* force rather than no force, and throw in an order of fries please. Zero macroscopic force doesn't imply zero microscopic force. Each and every charge within the mass is being forced continuously, though the average of all of the forces may vector sum to zero. Ok. The forces on these charges are in turn due to electromagnetic interactions with absolutely every other charge in the universe that fall within their light cones. Nonsense, although "the electrodynamics of moving bodies" pays tribute to Euclidean space, those who know relativity understand fully that "space" has no attributes. "Space" has size, volume & content, especially where a particle is. ```Brian. Distant matter not only influences the motions of charges, but it is the only influence on the motion of charges. The word distant is also a relative term. All particles are distant wrt any given charge, the only difference being the actual magnitude of their separation. If distant galaxies have no effect on the motion of local charges, then neither do near charges, because wrt any charge whatsoever, all of the others are distant. Empirically we observe that light (which is just em radiation, which is in turn just an electromagnetic interaction between charges) does in fact extend completely across the known universe. QED. So now light is also the carrier of inertia and gravity? The concept of spacetime is exactly the opposite of what the novice may think. Instead of a controlling "medium", it is a stretchable maginary map, showing that space has _NO_ attributes, "Space" has size, volume & content, especially where a particle is. ```Brian. -=- and that there are no "forces" acting at a distance. This may be difficult for Newtonians because Euclidean space is essential for Newtonian mechanics. I am sorry that I cannot agree that light or any other electromagnetic "charge" could be responsible for gravity and inertia, because that would be an easy explanation, but a more complicating -- wrong -- explanation. I would agree with you both counts. Columated EM radition is repulsive, not attractive. There is no transfer of energy with gravity. That said, EM radiation represents only a portition of all possible spatial and temporal encodings that the motion of charges can produce. To fomulate time dependent field equations, a false assumpution. is made that the Z spatial axis is interchangable with time. It is only approximate. This leaves many other derivatives of the Coulomb force unaccounted for in both QM and GR. Van der Waals and London forces are short-range examples. ...Just as magnetism is the short-range (1/r^3) component of EM. In a sense, we are saying it is not the repulsive long-range (1/r*2) component that responsible for gravity and inertia, it is all the long- range components remaining when you subtract the EM component. one then considers the Coulomb interaction of similar charge distributions centered on the ions, but now with the same sign as the original ions. These distributions exactly cancel those that we have considered before, so that the total interactions that we shall obtain will be those of the original system made of point charges only. The interaction of the cancelling distributions is computed in reciprocal space. The required Fourier transforms are particularly simple when the (arbitrary) shape of the distributions is chosen to be a gaussian. -=-SNiP-=- In itself, the principle of equivalence would allow field equations of almost unlimited complexity. Einstein could have included terms in the equations involving four spacetime derivatives, or six spacetime derivatives, or any even number of spacetime derivatives, but he limited himself to second- order differential equations. -=-SNiP-=- Sue... 2. Joe Fischer Einstein's Mistakes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Einstein's Mistakes | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | January 19th 06 10:55 AM |
Einstein's relativity theory proven with the 'lead' of a pencil(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | November 10th 05 05:14 AM |
About the TRICK in coordinates introduced by Kruskal and Szekeres in 1961 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 10 | August 16th 05 08:06 AM |
Albert Einstein Plagiarist of the Century? Maybe | Mad Scientist | Misc | 26 | September 29th 04 08:44 AM |
Saturn-Bound Spacecraft Tests Einstein's Theory | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | October 3rd 03 06:31 PM |