|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt22 Cosmos follows a pattern of the inside of an Atom #446 AtomTotality 4th ed
Now I used to like these two maps of the Cosmos of galaxies by Juric
and Jarrett: http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjur...rse/all100.gif Here is another good website: http://www.astro.princeton.edu/universe/ And here is another good website: http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff...tt/papers/LSS/ However, afraid to say that these two maps are better visuals in 3D of what the cosmos of galaxies looks like: http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearsc.html http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/wnearsc.gif Now I am going to start arguing in this book, that we have enough of a mapping of the galaxies of the Cosmos to be able to trashcan the Big Bang theory and validate the Atom Totality theory. We should not expect a cosmic pattern to emerge in a Big Bang theory other than to say galaxies are spaced from a explosion event. If it emerges that there are intricate patterns of galaxy distribution such as alternating dense regions (walls) with voids in a patterned manner such as a diffraction pattern of double slit experiment, or if we begin seeing cosmic rings of galaxies, then the Big Bang is no more. If you look at that atlas of the universe you see a pattern emerging immediately of the voids being honeycomb shaped and spaced geometrically opposite. So if there is three voids in the northern cosmic hemisphere, there are corresponding three voids at opposite in the southern cosmic hemisphere. I think voids can tell almost as much as what galaxies reveal. Now I have a book on the physics of the plutonium atom and on pages 72 and 73 shows the general set and the cubic set with drawings. Those drawings include elliptical shapes and lobe shapes. So that if the Universe is one big gigantic atom of plutonium, then we would have to see a Cosmic ring of galaxies because a lobe geometry would have rings of galaxies appearing, especially in the Cubic set. Now I remember either Jarrett or Juric talking about a "ring" of galaxies in their plates of pictures, and commenting that they did not know if it is a feature of astronomy or if it was due to the photography involved. But already the Big Bang is in hot water so to speak. It is in trouble. Sure, we can have a Wall of galaxies and voids in the Big Bang, but we cannot have a pattern of walls and voids. We cannot have a diffraction pattern as seen in double slit experiment of the distribution of galaxies. We cannot have mirror image voids or walls in the two hemispheres in a Big Bang. And we cannot have rings in the Big Bang theory. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt22 Cosmos follows a pattern of the inside of an Atom #448Atom Totality 4th ed
On May 25, 11:52*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: Now I used to like these two maps of the Cosmos of galaxies by Juric and Jarrett: http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjur...rse/all100.gif Here is another good website:http://www.astro.princeton.edu/universe/ And here is another good website:http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff...tt/papers/LSS/ However, afraid to say that these two maps are better visuals in 3D of what the cosmos of galaxies looks like: http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearsc.html http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/wnearsc.gif Another reason I am beginning to like these atlases of the Universe better than Jarrett's and Juric's layout is because the atlas takes no time to download, whereas some of Jarrett's and Juric's files are long time in waiting. But the question, the burning question in all future picture atlases of the Cosmos of galaxies is the question of whether there is a "pattern" or "not a pattern." And if there is a pattern, is it the 5f6 of the last six electrons of a plutonium atom? In one of Jarrett's or Juric's pictures, a ring starts to appear. In a Big Bang theory no ring should appear. In the atlas pictures, one can draw a line as a pole about 90degreeplus 45degree or about 135degree to 135+180 = 315 degree and where most everthing left of that pole line matches something to the right of that pole line. In other words a mirror image symmetry. The Big Bang offers no symmetry. The Atom Totality theory insists and demands cosmic symmetry. Now I am going to start arguing in this book, that we have enough of a mapping of the galaxies of the Cosmos to be able to trashcan the Big Bang theory and validate the Atom Totality theory. We should not expect a cosmic pattern to emerge in a Big Bang theory other than to say galaxies are spaced from a explosion event. If it emerges that there are intricate patterns of galaxy distribution such as alternating dense regions (walls) with voids in a patterned manner such as a diffraction pattern of double slit experiment, or if we begin seeing cosmic rings of galaxies, then the Big Bang is no more. If you look at that atlas of the universe you see a pattern emerging immediately of the voids being honeycomb shaped and spaced geometrically opposite. So if there is three voids in the northern cosmic hemisphere, there are corresponding three voids at opposite in the southern cosmic hemisphere. I think voids can tell almost as much as what galaxies reveal. Now I have a book on the physics of the plutonium atom and on pages 72 and 73 shows the general set and the cubic set with drawings. Those drawings include elliptical shapes and lobe shapes. So that if the Universe is one big gigantic atom of plutonium, then we would have to see a Cosmic ring of galaxies because a lobe geometry would have rings of galaxies appearing, especially in the Cubic set. Now I remember either Jarrett or Juric talking about a "ring" of galaxies in their plates of pictures, and commenting that they did not know if it is a feature of astronomy or if it was due to the photography involved. But already the Big Bang is in hot water so to speak. It is in trouble. Sure, we can have a Wall of galaxies and voids in the Big Bang, but we cannot have a pattern of walls and voids. We cannot have a diffraction pattern as seen in double slit experiment of the distribution of galaxies. We cannot have mirror image voids or walls in the two hemispheres in a Big Bang. And we cannot have rings in the Big Bang theory. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt22 pattern of the distribution of galaxies in Atom Totality #449Atom Totality 4th ed
http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearsc.html http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/wnearsc.gif Alright it was Jarrett that reported a ring structure involving P-P and P-I superclusters. And I suspect Juric had no such reports of a ring structure. --- quoting --- http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff...tt/papers/LSS/ The third layer (0.01 z 0.02) is dominated by the P-P supercluster (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627) disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown whether this ring-like structure is physically associated with the cosmic web or an artifact of projection. --- end quoting --- And if we look at the atlas of the universe website above can we see a ring structure? I would say yes, but not as clear as Jarrett's ring pattern. Now if we look at what a plutonium atom 5f6 looks like: I do have a picture in the book THE ELEMENTS BEYOND URANIUM, Seaborg & Loveland, 1990 and page 73. Let me call that shape a "long balloon" shape. I chemistry and physics they are called "lobes". I hate to say sausage shape or cigar shape, but rather a long balloon shape. And ask the question if Earth and astronomers were sitting on the surface of a long balloon compiling an atlas of galaxies that also rested on the surface of a long balloon, would they end up with the mapps shown above? I think we would with a correction to those mapps. If we corrected the mapps as a Doppler redshift that records not the distance away of a galaxy but whether the galaxy resides in a curved part of space on this long balloon. So that we can make a few credible assumptions about residing on a lobe shape. that when we look down the spine of the lobe we will see alot of galaxies, whereas if we looked at the nearby edges of the lobe we would end up seeing alot of voids. So with a Doppler redshift as untrustworthy of distance and rather instead, trustworthy as to curvature we could say that in the atlas picture there is a "spine of the lobe" that extends from Shapley and Herculean supercluster at about 60 degrees down through the P-P supercluster and extending to the Columba supercluster in the lower left edge. In other words, a lobe as the geometry of the cosmos would have a almost straight line of dense superclusters along its spine and 90degrees on each side of the spine we could not see much and that a search in this direction usually leads to voids. And not that there are really voids there, but just because the curvature drops off rapidly 90 degrees from the spine of the lobe. So that the mapps or atlases tells us only the ability to see, and not a accurate description of all the galaxies per distance. Consider a long thin sausage that can allow people to stand atop and walk on its spine and that we have little flashlights on posts shining at a beginning tour position. And so we have several hundred people standing at the beginning position. If they looked down the spine of this long sausage they would see alot of flashlights pointed and shining at these people. If they looked in the sides of the sausage where the curvature drops off soon and sharply, they see only a few flashlights. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt22 Classical-layered ages of the Cosmos, like an onion or treerings #391 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 2nd 11 09:32 PM |
Chapt22 layered ages of the Cosmos #387 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 30th 11 09:33 PM |
Chapt22 layered ages of the Cosmos #386 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 30th 11 07:13 AM |
chapt22 strongest evidences that trashcans the Big Bang #229 AtomTotality theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | December 31st 09 06:34 PM |
Chapt22 future news-- second ring like structure will be discovered#227 Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 30th 09 06:46 AM |