A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Chapt2 pictures of the Atom Totality theory #443 Atom Totality 4th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 24th 11, 08:00 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Chapt2 pictures of the Atom Totality theory #443 Atom Totality 4th ed

Now I am going to mix "pictures" with "interpretation" with
"intuition". I do not want a chapter on psychology of doing physics,
although that is a subject worth investigating.

As mentioned in the previous post, what usually separates the true
physicist from the teacher of physics, is that the true physicist runs
on intuition and is able to properly and correctly interpret the data.
The want-to-be physicist, or the teacher of physics is only good at
bringing
in the data. When it comes time to tell what the data means, only the
true physicist shines.

When Newton interpreted the data of Kepler, the other physicists of
his time were still picturing angels pushing the planet Earth in an
orbit.

When modern day astronomers and physicists saw solid-body-rotation of
globular clusters near galactic centers, they interpreted that data to
mean missing mass of "dark matter and dark energy", but a true
physicist would interpret the data that solid body rotation means we
are doing EM force and that the centers of galaxies is Dirac's
positron space magnetically attracting the common matter (electrons of
the atom totality).

When modern day astronomers and physicists see solid body rotation
displayed by entire separate galaxies, they see that data as meaning
missing mass of "dark matter and dark energy", whereas a true
physicist, again realizes that we no longer have gravity as the force,
but have EM or Coulomb force as the galaxies are attracted by the
nucleus of the atom totality.

When modern day astronomers and physicists are given the data that the
Cosmic Microwave Radiation Background is blackbody radiation, they
impishly interpret that to
mean a Big Bang explosion occurred and thence look for non-uniformity,
as if to say
"it really cannot be blackbody". To a real physicist, upon hearing
that CMBR is blackbody
immediately does a simple logic sentence-- blackbody only occurs as
cavity radiation, meaning, the Cosmos is some gigantic cavity, meaning
the only perfect cavity is the inside of an atom, meaning the Cosmos
must be a gigantic atom.

Upon hearing the ice caps are melting away at a alarming fast rate
with all sorts of other data on global climate and global temperature,
the scientists and astronomers and physicists are reluctant to admit
that human activity of fossil fuel burning is a primary
factor in this global warming trend. Just recently Freeman Dyson
commented that Global Warming was a good thing.

So what the point is that in physics, not so much in the case of
Global Warming and biology and environmental science, but in large
part of advanced physics, scientists of all types are good at
collecting and eking out data
from Nature, but when it comes time to actually make sense of the
data, to interpret it correctly, there are only a few who have that
ability, whereas all the others would wrongly
interpret the science data.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #2  
Old May 24th 11, 09:26 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43
Default Chapt2 pictures of the Atom Totality theory #443 Atom Totality4th ed

On May 24, 3:00*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:

To a real physicist, upon hearing
that CMBR is blackbody
immediately does a simple logic sentence-- blackbody only occurs as
cavity radiation, meaning, the Cosmos is some gigantic cavity


Yeah dude. That's not your mama's cavity.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chapt2 pictures of the Atom Totality theory #442 Atom Totality 4th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 May 24th 11 07:31 AM
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 6th 09 08:29 AM
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 6 August 13th 09 04:00 PM
where is the dark-matter, obviously, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality#127 ; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 August 7th 09 07:32 PM
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY [email protected] Astronomy Misc 2 May 21st 09 07:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.