|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Residual Strong Nuclear Force vs. Dark Forces?
Nuclear force - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force We know that the Strong Nuclear Force leaks out from within the nucleons and allows them to bind together into an atomic nucleus, which we call the Residual Strong Force. This is normally only effective at distances of between 1.0 and 2.5 fm. Below 1.0 fm, this force actually becomes repulsive. Now, since we know that the gluons that escape from inside the nucleons can travel to the next adjoining nucleon, it must also be possible that the gluons can completely escape the nucleus altogether, especially from the border nucleons, i.e. the protons and neutrons that make up the surface edge of a nucleus. I'm not talking a hell of a lot of them escaping, maybe just 1% of 1% or something that small. And since gluons travel at the speed of light, they can travel great distances very quickly. Now let's say one of these gluons escapes a nucleus, and depending on the density of the material it is travelling through it may not get captured by another nucleus for quite some time. And even if it got captured, it's effect on the movement of the capturing nucleus would so minimal that it would barely be noticed above its quantum vibrations. In fact, this gluon could likely travel through an entire solar system without really getting captured by any other nucleus within it. However, over the confines of an entire galaxy, it might indeed get captured by something along the way. Even within the confines of an entire galaxy cluster, it might get captured. Now let's imagine that this one lone gluon is joined by trillions more, from every atom in the galaxy. The gluons don't even have to hit a nucleus, it could just hit another gluon and still create an attractive force. One gluon may not have much effect, but many trillions might affect the shape of the galaxy, creating a helper force to gravity. It might even create an attractive effect like what we call Dark Matter. It's been found that the Dark Matter halo around the Milky Way resembles an American football, or rugby ball; and the narrow end is planar to the disk of the galaxy, while the long end is perpendicular to the disk. Perhaps this reflect the relative abundance of nucleons in those directions? Then we also know that the Strong Force becomes repulsive at scales smaller than 0.7 fm. What if a similar effect also occurs at extremely large scales of over 10 billion light-years? This might create the repulsive effect which we call Dark Energy? This would of course work against gravity. Also, it's been shown that Dark Energy didn't become an issue until maybe 5 billion years after the Big Bang. Gluons would be more likely to escape the nucleus of more complex elements, i.e. "Metals" in the astronomical sense of the word, any nucleus bigger than hydrogen. What this could reflect is a critical point when enough metals were produced in stars to became a large enough portion of nuclei in the universe. Enough metals where gluons now escape more readily, creating repulsive forces at large distances. Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Random thought: Dark Matter & Dark Energy vs. Strong & Weak NuclearForces | Yousuf Khan | Astronomy Misc | 17 | December 8th 07 08:42 PM |
The nuclear forces vs. gravity | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 29th 06 03:00 PM |
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces | yinbing-zhou | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 27th 06 11:18 AM |
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces | yinbing-zhou | Policy | 0 | July 27th 06 11:17 AM |
PION AND STRONG FORCE UNNECESSARY | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 8th 05 05:50 PM |