A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Chapt2 pictures of the Atom Totality theory #442 Atom Totality 4th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 24th 11, 07:31 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Chapt2 pictures of the Atom Totality theory #442 Atom Totality 4th ed

My signature block for my sci newsgroup posts goes like this:

whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


I could not think of a more compact statement in as few of words
as possible to explain the Atom Totality theory, other than to draw
a picture of the theory.

What is a "dot"? *Are there more than 92 of them?


Simple version of what a plutonium atom looks like of its
electron dot cloud :


* * * * * * . \ . *. | . * /.
* * * * * *. . \. . .|. . /. .
* * * * * * * ..\....|.../...
* * * * * * * *::\:::|::/::
* * * * * * * * * *_ _


* * * * * * * * * (:Y
* * * * * * * * * *_ _
* * * * * * * *::/:::|::\::
* * * * * * * ../....|...\...
* * * * * *. . /. . .|. . \. .
* * * * * * . / . *. | . * \ .


There are six lobes of the 5f6

I do not have time to explain Quantum Physics of the electron
dot cloud for you. The electron can come in either Collapsed
Wavefunction
form and thus a "unit" or it can be Uncollapsed Wavefunction where
the electron
is spread out to infinity and each dot is a tiny piece of the
electron.


Classically, the "dot" is described as the probability of finding the
electron
at that point in space. But that is just a simpleton interpretation.

In all my years devoted to science the largest weakness of a scientist
or scientists is usually their inability or weakness of proper
interpretation of the data. Finding the data and organizing the data
is far easier than the end game of science-- understanding and
interpreting the data. Interpretation is usually what makes or breaks
a scientist, and what puts one as a top ranking scientist to that of
one who ends up as teaching science. The ability to know what the data
means, and it requires that elusive rare trait of "intuition." The
best scientists of the 20th century, other than me were Dirac and
Bell, for they properly carried the physics of the 20th century to the
Atom Totality theory. Dirac was a huge giant of physics for his
intuition was
supremely impeccable. Dirac gave us not only "new radioactivities" but
also what gravity is as a "positron space". John Bell gave huge
progress towards an Atom Totality theory with his concept of
"superdeterminism."

The difference between a real physicist and a teacher of physics, is
that the real physicist can properly interpret the data and intuit
what the correct path forward is.

We see this in such a simple case of data of physics of the 20th
century of the electron-dot-cloud. It is almost in every physics
textbook and chemistry textbook of the dot cloud pattern. But who in
physics in the 20th century was able to correctly understand and
interpret that? Perhaps only one physicist.

One interpretation is the electric potential of an electron
stretches out
to infinity and so the dots are dense near the nucleus and thin out
the
further away. In the Atom Totality this electric potential, or dots,
are galaxies. And when the dots are put together they form the
Cosmic Electrons.
If you were to join all the galaxies together you end up with one
electron
of 231Pu Cosmic Atom Totality.


One interpretation of the electron dot cloud was given by Born.


In the Max Born interpretation
of the dots of the electron-dot-cloud, where the dot is
the probability of finding a whole electron at that point and time
in
space.

But to those who are bad in interpretation of physics, end up thinking
that what Born said was the "be all and end all of the topic." As if
they
fail to even understand what the word "interpretation" means.

Now I get angered and frustrated with people who cannot even
comprehend the word "totality" when they hear of the Atom Totality
theory, and start thinking of the Cosmos as a molecule or other far
fetched.

I like another interpretation of the dots of the electron-dot-cloud.
I
like to think of the dots as a tiny smashed or shattered piece of an
electron. So let us imagine an
electron as a glass ball and it is shattered into a large
number of tiny fragments. Each of those fragments represents a
galaxy.


So if all the galaxies of the night sky were joined together they
would make up the last six electrons of a
Cosmic atom of plutonium, the isotope of 231Pu, the 5f6 of
plutonium.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Redshift and Microwave radiation favor Atom Totality and disfavorBig Bang #9; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory Net-Teams, Astronomy Misc 1 May 31st 10 05:19 PM
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 6th 09 09:29 AM
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 6 August 13th 09 04:00 PM
where is the dark-matter, obviously, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality#127 ; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 August 7th 09 07:32 PM
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY [email protected] Astronomy Misc 2 May 21st 09 07:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.