|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
Troy wrote: I don't think it's plausible, either, but it's (fairly) easy to handle large masses in space. The point is to make big hollow pressure vessels on a large scale. Perhaps just unpeeling the asteroid into a larger habitat using solar mirrors is a lot easier. A semi-molten asteroid with differing pockets of viscosity all the way through is just gonna pop. You are going to have to stir it in a molten state to make it homogeneous; could that be done via electromagnetic fields in the case of a nickel-iron asteroid? Pat |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
Eivind Kjorstad wrote: High-rpm-low-radius habs have a different problem though, the apparent gravity inside them has a sharp gradient, and coriolis would be a bitch. Wouldn't it be easier to hang the hotel on a tether, with a counter-mass on the other end, and spin it ? (the counter-mass can be a second hotel if desired) That way you can have as small a structure as you like, with very low rpm, and still whatever gravity is needed to maintain health. Difficult to dock with though. You could link up to the center of the tether and slid down to the end you wanted, but the change in mass would mean that the center of rotation would change, and the increase in overall mass slow its rate of rotation down as the docking ship gets spun up. Pat |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
Matthias Warkus wrote: For starters, the reason they are going to exist isn't to give people a really fun place to live, but make a buck. Think oil platform rather than aircraft carrier. I still think that the Antarctic science stations are a fairly close analogy, due to the fact that you have very long periods with no contact with the outside world other than via radio or telecommunications, and life outside the station can be downright deadly in if something goes wrong. Pat |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
Matthias Warkus wrote: People have held out in zero-g space stations for more than one year without serious health problems AFAIK. But the downside was it took hours of exercise per day to accomplish that, as well as wearing a special suit that was uncomfortable and restricted mobility by using elastic straps to generate forces the muscles had to fight against. This cut into both the time the crew had to perform useful work, and made their stay on the station (Mir in this case) more unpleasant. Pat |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
Matthias Warkus wrote: I'd think it cheaper to let people live in zero-g and put two hours of mandatory daily exercise into their contracts. That's two hours less useful work they can do per day (unless you have them run on a treadmill to generate electricity, I imagine), and they are going to use up a lot of energy doing the exercise, meaning they will tire faster and need more food and water. Pat |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
Pat Flannery schrieb:
Matthias Warkus wrote: I'd think it cheaper to let people live in zero-g and put two hours of mandatory daily exercise into their contracts. That's two hours less useful work they can do per day (unless you have them run on a treadmill to generate electricity, I imagine), and they are going to use up a lot of energy doing the exercise, meaning they will tire faster and need more food and water. Of course. But I think it's still cheaper than building a rotating habitat unless there are *LOTS* of workers. mawa -- http://www.prellblog.de |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
In rec.arts.sf.science Pat Flannery wrote:
Around a year back, he was going on about some democratic revolution happening in China during the Olympics IIRC. This is a interesting fixation on one sports event or country. Not only is it an odd fixation, it's also totally ludicrous. Those people old enough to remember life before the Communists came to power will rightly remember that it was a whole lot worse. The Japanese were doing all kinds of terrible things and the Nationalists weren't really very nice people either. Those people not old enough to remember those times will still remember a nearly constant and extremely fast rise in the standard of living and general conditions in the country. There are probably some people with outspoken political beliefs who are quite unhappy but for the most part the people there have no *reason* to want a revolution, and every reason to avoid one. And while I'm as much a fan of liberty and democracy as the next guy, I'd have a hard time saying that they're wrong. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
Michael Ash schrieb:
In rec.arts.sf.science Pat Flannery wrote: Around a year back, he was going on about some democratic revolution happening in China during the Olympics IIRC. This is a interesting fixation on one sports event or country. Not only is it an odd fixation, it's also totally ludicrous. Those people old enough to remember life before the Communists came to power will rightly remember that it was a whole lot worse. The Japanese were doing all kinds of terrible things and the Nationalists weren't really very nice people either. Those people not old enough to remember those times will still remember a nearly constant and extremely fast rise in the standard of living and general conditions in the country. There are probably some people with outspoken political beliefs who are quite unhappy but for the most part the people there have no *reason* to want a revolution, and every reason to avoid one. And while I'm as much a fan of liberty and democracy as the next guy, I'd have a hard time saying that they're wrong. And on top of that, China is increasingly implementing rule of law in many areas. Apparently, in China you can these days *sue* a state-owned company that wants to take your land and win. You could argue that at present, there is more personal liberty in China than there ever was. It seems they are also putting in place municipal elections and such? It's a bit like the Prussian reforms, giving people more rights and improving life for large segments of the population to *avoid* having to install democracy on a national scale. mawa -- http://www.prellblog.de |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
"Matthias Warkus" wrote in message
... Pat Flannery schrieb: Matthias Warkus wrote: I'd think it cheaper to let people live in zero-g and put two hours of mandatory daily exercise into their contracts. That's two hours less useful work they can do per day (unless you have them run on a treadmill to generate electricity, I imagine), and they are going to use up a lot of energy doing the exercise, meaning they will tire faster and need more food and water. Of course. But I think it's still cheaper than building a rotating habitat unless there are *LOTS* of workers. If we're building SPS, then we will have LOTS of workers and the ability to build substational stations. mawa -- http://www.prellblog.de -- Greg Moore SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available! Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Questions about "The High Frontier"
In rec.arts.sf.science Matthias Warkus wrote:
And on top of that, China is increasingly implementing rule of law in many areas. Apparently, in China you can these days *sue* a state-owned company that wants to take your land and win. You could argue that at present, there is more personal liberty in China than there ever was. It seems they are also putting in place municipal elections and such? I never even thought of arguing that there's more personal liberty in China than there ever was because it seems so *obvious*. It wasn't exactly a bastion of freedom and democracy before the Reds Took Over, after all. Of course that doesn't mean it couldn't be one now, look at what happened in Taiwan and South Korea for example, but all in all the place is a lot better off than it was. It's a bit like the Prussian reforms, giving people more rights and improving life for large segments of the population to *avoid* having to install democracy on a national scale. I think that's the idea, anyway. I believe the Party realizes that making people happy works better than making them afraid in the long term. Ultimately it seems that people won't agitate for democracy or freedom unless there is some *other* push, like poverty or extreme abuses of power. Has there been a democratic revolution that wasn't pushed by something else? Even the US revolution was prompted by taxes and dislike of various aspects of British rule, with the whole freedom and democracy thing being almost tacked on as a rider by people who saw the revolution as an opportunity to make something really great. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The "experts" strike again... :) :) :) "Direct" version of my "open Service Module" on NSF | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | August 17th 07 02:19 PM |
Great News! Boulder High School CWA "panelists" could be infor it! | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 2nd 07 09:43 PM |
"VideO Madness" "Pulp FictiOn!!!," ...., and "Kill Bill!!!..." | Colonel Jake TM | Misc | 0 | August 26th 06 09:24 PM |
why no true high resolution systems for "jetstream" seeing? | Frank Johnson | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | January 9th 06 05:21 PM |