At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?

Lo, many moons past, on 4 Mar 2004 07:58:41 -0800, a stranger called
by some (bart janssens) came forth and
told this tale in alt.atheism

And, you have still not shown that you are a scientist
rather than a priest. I will ask you yet again:

What evidence will convince you that orbital satellites
exist? If you have no answer, you are not seeking scientifically.
What evidence would falsify your hypotesis that there are no
man-made satellites in orbit?

VISUAL OBSERVATION, AIDED WITH A TELESCOOP,
so that I can see that "the thing" is
NOT a "ET-ROCK", ie a "Extra-Terrestrial Rock"
but a real ROCK-ET"...
Helas, all the people of the "observatoria"
f.i. "volks-sterrenwacht" admit that you
can NOT SEE the difference...so...

That's so bloody simple, I can do it one night's observation. Let me
know when you'll be in the San Francisco Bay Area.

What evidence will convince you that a person has gone faster than
1.200KPH at sea-level, if nobody has reached more than 600KPH?
So, YOU must be a priest or a (rethro-)Prophet to believe that the
sound-barrier is broken at sea-level?

I've posted the evidence. You ignored it.
--

Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5

Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"

bart janssens wrote:

This is a typical example of doublethink.

From the point of your OWN EXPERIENCE and of your OWN EMPIRICAL
METHOD...you never experienced a velocity of more than 600KPH at
sea-level...and you really do not know a honest person that has gone
faster than 600KPH at sea-level,
however you probably "follow" the believe that many men have already
broken the sound-barrier at sea-level, which means that those men went
FASTER than 1200KPH at sea-level...

In order to neutralize this contradiction most people believe that is
FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO DEMONSTRATE THE BREAKING OF THE SOUND-BARRIER,
and to go faster than 1200KPH, because of the supersonic bang,...

and then they simply forget the difference
between 600KPH and 1200KPH....



In the book "1984" you can read the following sentences.

"In Newspeak there is no word for Science. The EMPIRICAL method of
thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were
founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc. And
even technological progress only happens when its products can in some
way be used for the diminution of human liberty."

"War is a way of shattering to pieces, or POURING INTO THE
STRATOSPHERE, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which
might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence,
in the long run, too intelligent"


My words:
And if you claim that "2+2=5" and "600=1200",
than you can easily believe that space-travel, which needs 28000KPH,
is possible...

Do the doublethink-test:
http://home.sprintmail.com/~astronom...nts/dttest.htm

Go to www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html
www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/proof1.html

bart janssens wrote:

This is a typical example of doublethink.

From the point of your OWN EXPERIENCE and of your OWN EMPIRICAL
METHOD...you never experienced a velocity of more than 600KPH at
sea-level...and you really do not know a honest person that has gone
faster than 600KPH at sea-level,
however you probably "follow" the believe that many men have already
broken the sound-barrier at sea-level, which means that those men went
FASTER than 1200KPH at sea-level...

In order to neutralize this contradiction most people believe that is
FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO DEMONSTRATE THE BREAKING OF THE SOUND-BARRIER,
and to go faster than 1200KPH, because of the supersonic bang,...

and then they simply forget the difference
between 600KPH and 1200KPH....



In the book "1984" you can read the following sentences.

"In Newspeak there is no word for Science. The EMPIRICAL method of
thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were
founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc. And
even technological progress only happens when its products can in some
way be used for the diminution of human liberty."

"War is a way of shattering to pieces, or POURING INTO THE
STRATOSPHERE, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which
might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence,
in the long run, too intelligent"


My words:
And if you claim that "2+2=5" and "600=1200",
than you can easily believe that space-travel, which needs 28000KPH,
is possible...

Do the doublethink-test:
http://home.sprintmail.com/~astronom...nts/dttest.htm

Go to www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html
www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/proof1.html

What evidence will convince you that a person has gone faster than
1.200KPH at sea-level, if nobody has reached more than 600KPH?
So, YOU must be a priest or a (rethro-)Prophet to believe that the
sound-barrier is broken at sea-level?

I've posted the evidence. You ignored it.

What evidence? Where did you post it?



Did you post any evidence about the proof
that the Space Travel of the Space Shuttle is REAL?

You admit that you saw 8 Space Shuttle Launches, don't you?

And you also admit that you NEVER SAW
the Space Shuttle dis-appear behind the horizon, don't you?

So, the thing that was visible in Europe, was probably
NOT the Space Shuttle, of which you saw the launch, wasn't it?

What evidence will convince you that a person has gone faster than
1.200KPH at sea-level, if nobody has reached more than 600KPH?
So, YOU must be a priest or a (rethro-)Prophet to believe that the
sound-barrier is broken at sea-level?

I've posted the evidence. You ignored it.

What evidence? Where did you post it?



Did you post any evidence about the proof
that the Space Travel of the Space Shuttle is REAL?

You admit that you saw 8 Space Shuttle Launches, don't you?

And you also admit that you NEVER SAW
the Space Shuttle dis-appear behind the horizon, don't you?

So, the thing that was visible in Europe, was probably
NOT the Space Shuttle, of which you saw the launch, wasn't it?

Lo, many moons past, on 8 Mar 2004 09:08:12 -0800, a stranger called
by some (bart janssens) came forth and
told this tale in alt.atheism

What evidence will convince you that a person has gone faster than
1.200KPH at sea-level, if nobody has reached more than 600KPH?
So, YOU must be a priest or a (rethro-)Prophet to believe that the
sound-barrier is broken at sea-level?

I've posted the evidence. You ignored it.

What evidence? Where did you post it?

Right here, in this thread.

Did you post any evidence about the proof
that the Space Travel of the Space Shuttle is REAL?

Piles of it.

You admit that you saw 8 Space Shuttle Launches, don't you?

"Admit"? That's an odd choice of words. I saw eight l;aunches, yes.

And you also admit that you NEVER SAW
the Space Shuttle dis-appear behind the horizon, don't you?

Never did see that. I know a few thousand people who did track the
shuttle to the horizon several times.

So, the thing that was visible in Europe, was probably
NOT the Space Shuttle, of which you saw the launch, wasn't it?

Faulty logic. If it wasn't the Shuttle, what was it? And why was it
only visible during announced shuttle flights, and shaped and colored
exactly like a shuttle orbiter?
--

Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5

Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"

Lo, many moons past, on 8 Mar 2004 09:08:12 -0800, a stranger called
by some (bart janssens) came forth and
told this tale in alt.atheism

What evidence will convince you that a person has gone faster than
1.200KPH at sea-level, if nobody has reached more than 600KPH?
So, YOU must be a priest or a (rethro-)Prophet to believe that the
sound-barrier is broken at sea-level?

I've posted the evidence. You ignored it.

What evidence? Where did you post it?

Right here, in this thread.

Did you post any evidence about the proof
that the Space Travel of the Space Shuttle is REAL?

Piles of it.

You admit that you saw 8 Space Shuttle Launches, don't you?

"Admit"? That's an odd choice of words. I saw eight l;aunches, yes.

And you also admit that you NEVER SAW
the Space Shuttle dis-appear behind the horizon, don't you?

Never did see that. I know a few thousand people who did track the
shuttle to the horizon several times.

So, the thing that was visible in Europe, was probably
NOT the Space Shuttle, of which you saw the launch, wasn't it?

Faulty logic. If it wasn't the Shuttle, what was it? And why was it
only visible during announced shuttle flights, and shaped and colored
exactly like a shuttle orbiter?
--

Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5

Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"

Douglas Berry wrote in message . ..
Lo, many moons past, on 8 Mar 2004 09:08:12 -0800, a stranger called
by some (bart janssens) came forth and
told this tale in alt.atheism

What evidence will convince you that a person has gone faster than
1.200KPH at sea-level, if nobody has reached more than 600KPH?
So, YOU must be a priest or a (rethro-)Prophet to believe that the
sound-barrier is broken at sea-level?

I've posted the evidence. You ignored it.

What evidence? Where did you post it?

Right here, in this thread.

Did you post any evidence about the proof
that the Space Travel of the Space Shuttle is REAL?

Piles of it.

You admit that you saw 8 Space Shuttle Launches, don't you?

"Admit"? That's an odd choice of words. I saw eight l;aunches, yes.

And you also admit that you NEVER SAW
the Space Shuttle dis-appear behind the horizon, don't you?

Never did see that. I know a few thousand people who did track the
shuttle to the horizon several times.

So, the thing that was visible in Europe, was probably
NOT the Space Shuttle, of which you saw the launch, wasn't it?

Faulty logic.

Is it faulty to claim that a "thing, with a maximum height
of 300km" that did NOT disappear behind the horizon of Florida,
can be visible in Europe?
behind the horizon

Douglas Berry wrote in message . ..
Lo, many moons past, on 8 Mar 2004 09:08:12 -0800, a stranger called
by some (bart janssens) came forth and
told this tale in alt.atheism

What evidence will convince you that a person has gone faster than
1.200KPH at sea-level, if nobody has reached more than 600KPH?
So, YOU must be a priest or a (rethro-)Prophet to believe that the
sound-barrier is broken at sea-level?

I've posted the evidence. You ignored it.

What evidence? Where did you post it?

Right here, in this thread.

Did you post any evidence about the proof
that the Space Travel of the Space Shuttle is REAL?

Piles of it.

You admit that you saw 8 Space Shuttle Launches, don't you?

"Admit"? That's an odd choice of words. I saw eight l;aunches, yes.

And you also admit that you NEVER SAW
the Space Shuttle dis-appear behind the horizon, don't you?

Never did see that. I know a few thousand people who did track the
shuttle to the horizon several times.

So, the thing that was visible in Europe, was probably
NOT the Space Shuttle, of which you saw the launch, wasn't it?

Faulty logic.

Is it faulty to claim that a "thing, with a maximum height
of 300km" that did NOT disappear behind the horizon of Florida,
can be visible in Europe?
behind the horizon

bart janssens mad an ass of himself when he wrote:

(snip of his incessant inanities)

So, Bartyboy, did you skip your meds today or have you just
developed a tolerance for thorazine?

--Bill Thompson