What If Venus is craterless

What if Venus has no craters? That makes sense to me. The Earth's
atmosphere does in some degree protect Earth from meteorites.
Best to keep in mind its size and mass density is just a little less
than Earth's its big difference is its very dense atmosphere that is 96%
carbon dioxide(heavy gas) Its atmosphere is as heavy as going down 3,000
feet under Earth's water. that's heavy stuff. that can create great
friction That is the reason for this thinking. Might add Venus's
atmosphere is so hot it can melt tin. That can help explode a meteorite.
Well using NASA con men thinking. Once upon a time Venus was like
Earth,and had running water was very green and had lots of life Why not
TreBert

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
What if Venus has no craters? That makes sense to me. The Earth's
atmosphere does in some degree protect Earth from meteorites.
Best to keep in mind its size and mass density is just a little less
than Earth's its big difference is its very dense atmosphere that is 96%
carbon dioxide(heavy gas) Its atmosphere is as heavy as going down 3,000
feet under Earth's water. that's heavy stuff. that can create great
friction That is the reason for this thinking. Might add Venus's
atmosphere is so hot it can melt tin. That can help explode a meteorite.
Well using NASA con men thinking. Once upon a time Venus was like
Earth,and had running water was very green and had lots of life Why not
TreBert


http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/vc/vcmap.html

So much for that theory!

Double-A

Double- Thank you for that picture site. My thought was this morning
that Venus has no crators. That site after enlarging those circles does
not completely prove my theory is bad thinking,and for these reasons.
Enlarged you will see lava has pored out from the walls,and only lave
flow shown coming out of these fractured walls. My enlarge picture of
the peak Maat mons shows this very clearly,even has a broken lower right
part of its wall no other creates for about 1000 square miles around it
Just a fracture plain as your site has clearly shown. I don't part with
my theories without better evidence(my ego won't let me) Best to
keep in mind Venus has large and and great amounts of volcanoes and
looking straight down its very hard to tell how the circle was made.
Maat Mons is five miles high and yet it looks just like it could be made
from a meteorite TreBert

If Venus was hit by meteorites like Mercury it would show just as many.
Reason is there is little erosion because it has no winds. This is shown
to us by its very tall peaks. This is shown to us by its fractured
plains. Venus turns slower than a man can walk. I theorize it might have
tiny vortexes(twisters) because it must have an updraft created by its
very hot surface. Lets now go to the top of its atmosphere Where hot
thinner carbon dioxide can be bleed into the very cold vacuum of
space.(heat goes to cold) The upward radiation must be great. Is it
possible that a temperature can be balanced out between this hot and
cold layer,and a microscopic organic cells might flourish? Such
thinking was thought of for the layers of Jupiter atmosphere(yes)
Just this thought is Venus's thick atmosphere,and upward draft give it a
upward bouyancy much greater than its downward force of gravity?. I like
this theory(just thought of it) For it could make walking on Venus's
surface much like walking 3,000 feet under water. Could you float,
Could your weight be just a few pounds? Man makes great use of buoyant.
Maybe a sub would make a nice vehicle to float around Mars,much like a
blimp in our much lower buoyant atmosphere. I like the force of
buoyant,and use it every chance I get TreBert Well best to keep in
mind your body has only about a 15lb negative bouyancy,but your mass is
the same as in water or air. Just another thought I think of its
carbon dioxide as a two sided mirron.

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Double- Thank you for that picture site. My thought was this morning
that Venus has no crators. That site after enlarging those circles does
not completely prove my theory is bad thinking,and for these reasons.
Enlarged you will see lava has pored out from the walls,and only lave
flow shown coming out of these fractured walls. My enlarge picture of
the peak Maat mons shows this very clearly,even has a broken lower right
part of its wall no other creates for about 1000 square miles around it
Just a fracture plain as your site has clearly shown. I don't part with
my theories without better evidence(my ego won't let me) Best to
keep in mind Venus has large and and great amounts of volcanoes and
looking straight down its very hard to tell how the circle was made.
Maat Mons is five miles high and yet it looks just like it could be made
from a meteorite TreBert


They used to think the Moons craters might have been of volcanic origin
too, but no more.

Double-A

Double-A Right you are Moon craters were said to be volcanoes(bad idea)
Venus is shown to us by radar image,and that is not the same as
reflected Sun light. Why should I disregard my idea on poorly shown
images. That does relate to the moon's bad theory considering we see the
moon so very clear. It is not one bit blurry. It has no atmosphere,and
is so very close. We can even see frost in its northern crater.
TreBert

What if Venus is the roundest object in our solar system? Good physics
tells me it has to be. TreBert

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Double-A Right you are Moon craters were said to be volcanoes(bad idea)
Venus is shown to us by radar image,and that is not the same as
reflected Sun light. Why should I disregard my idea on poorly shown
images. That does relate to the moon's bad theory considering we see the
moon so very clear. It is not one bit blurry. It has no atmosphere,and
is so very close. We can even see frost in its northern crater.
TreBert


Here are some more pictures of craters on Venus:

http://ftp.es.vim.org/solar/span/vencrate.htm

Notice the picture of a crater cluster such as I was talking about a
couple days ago. The thick atmosphere can break a meteoroid into
several pieces before it hits. But you are right in one regard, there
are no small craters on Venus, for the reason you stated.

Double-A

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

What if Venus is the roundest object in our solar system? Good physics
tells me it has to be. TreBert

What if little birds were pecking acorns far out to sea?

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

Maybe the ice in Antarctica melted away? A gentle landing is not the
only answer.

Saul Levy


On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:20:21 -0500, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

Double=A Thank you again for those nice radar pictures. I never saw
them before,and surely would have not stated Venus having no impact
craters. I was not 100% wrong,and I'm still thinking how very large
crators were formed by large meteorites. We have to consider meteor
speed. Here on Earth a meteorite fell very softly between two girl lying
on an Australian beach. In Tenn. a meteorite came down and hit the trunk
of a car(did not total it) Dog killed by being hit by a
meteorite. Meteorites found on the ice in Antarctica etc
Why did these meteorites have such gentle landings? Answer is They
came through the atmosphere at the very best angle. They skipped in.
First slowed down by less friction,and moved through the the heavier air
at a slow speed. This was true for Venus. Double-A can I add Venus has
a great up force like I posted,and that could slow the meteorite down so
that it does not explode in the atmosphere. I apologise for being half
wrong,but even being a little right is not to bad. Reality is
some of the impacts could have created volcanoes where Venus's crust
might be thin. Making a print out to study in bed. Pictures
and Feynman diagrams mean a lot to me TreBert