|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HA HA! NASA carbon satellite FAILS!
Dear NASA; Stay the Hell out of the global warming SCAM! Explore SPACE
instead, like you used to. NASA greenhouse gas satellite fails * Story Highlights * $273 million project was intended to study effect of greenhouse gases * NASA: Crew members scrambling to figure out what went wrong with satellite * Problem arose several minutes into launch of a rocket carrying the satellite (CNN) -- NASA said early Tuesday that it failed to launch a satellite which would have monitored greenhouse gases to study how they affect the Earth's climate. The rocket carrying the satellite launched at 1:55 a.m. PT (4:55 a.m. ET) from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, but the "payload fairing failed to separate," according to a statement on NASA's Web site. The problems occurred several minutes into the launch. "We have declared a launch contingency, meaning that we did not have a successful launch tonight," said George Diller, an agency spokesman. Project crew members on the ground were trying to determine the cause. NASA scheduled a news conference for later in the morning to provide more details. The $273 million satellite, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, would have collected "precise global measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere" to help better forecast the changes in carbon dioxide "and the effect that these changes may have on the Earth's climate." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
HA HA! NASA carbon satellite FAILS!
On Feb 24, 5:50*am, GW SCAM wrote:""
idiot... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
HA HA! NASA carbon satellite FAILS!
On Feb 24, 8:50*am, GW SCAM wrote:
Dear NASA; *Stay the Hell out of the global warming SCAM! *Explore SPACE instead, like you used to. NASA greenhouse gas satellite fails * * * Story Highlights * * * $273 million project was intended to study effect of greenhouse gases * * * NASA: Crew members scrambling to figure out what went wrong with satellite * * * Problem arose several minutes into launch of a rocket carrying the satellite (CNN) -- NASA said early Tuesday that it failed to launch a satellite which would have monitored greenhouse gases to study how they affect the Earth's climate. The rocket carrying the satellite launched at 1:55 a.m. PT (4:55 a.m. ET) from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, but the "payload fairing failed to separate," according to a statement on NASA's Web site. The problems occurred several minutes into the launch. "We have declared a launch contingency, meaning that we did not have a successful launch tonight," said George Diller, an agency spokesman. Project crew members on the ground were trying to determine the cause. NASA scheduled a news conference for later in the morning to provide more details. The $273 million satellite, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, would have collected "precise global measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere" to help better forecast the changes in carbon dioxide "and the effect that these changes may have on the Earth's climate." And this is funny because............? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-pollution, global warming denialist flat earthers are nowclaiming victory because of the satellite's failure to launch and proclaimingthat it is a sign from God that science is lies and that pollution is the wayof the Lord!
Brainless right wing crap head GW SCAM wrote:
The $273 million satellite, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, would have collected "precise global measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere" to help better forecast the changes in carbon dioxide "and the effect that these changes may have on the Earth's climate." Evidently, pro-pollution, global warming denialist flat earthers are now claiming victory because of the satellite's failure to launch and proclaiming that it is a sign from God that science is lies and that pollution is the way of the Lord! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
HA HA! NASA carbon satellite FAILS!
On Feb 24, 7:50*am, GW SCAM wrote:
Dear NASA; *Stay the Hell out of the global warming SCAM! *Explore SPACE instead, like you used to. NASA greenhouse gas satellite fails * * * Story Highlights * * * $273 million project was intended to study effect of greenhouse gases * * * NASA: Crew members scrambling to figure out what went wrong with satellite * * * Problem arose several minutes into launch of a rocket carrying the satellite (CNN) -- NASA said early Tuesday that it failed to launch a satellite which would have monitored greenhouse gases to study how they affect the Earth's climate. The rocket carrying the satellite launched at 1:55 a.m. PT (4:55 a.m. ET) from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, but the "payload fairing failed to separate," according to a statement on NASA's Web site. The problems occurred several minutes into the launch. "We have declared a launch contingency, meaning that we did not have a successful launch tonight," said George Diller, an agency spokesman. Project crew members on the ground were trying to determine the cause. NASA scheduled a news conference for later in the morning to provide more details. The $273 million satellite, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, would have collected "precise global measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere" to help better forecast the changes in carbon dioxide "and the effect that these changes may have on the Earth's climate." Hey Rich why do you choose to keep using these fake names? Is it because you are ashamed of your posts? Or is it because you don't people to realize just what a sad little person you are, kinda like Nancy the zeta reticulan, or Brad Guth or maybe Danny Minn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
HA HA! NASA carbon satellite FAILS!
On Feb 24, 7:50*am, GW SCAM wrote:
Dear NASA; *Stay the Hell out of the global warming SCAM! *Explore SPACE instead, like you used to. NASA greenhouse gas satellite fails * * * Story Highlights * * * $273 million project was intended to study effect of greenhouse gases * * * NASA: Crew members scrambling to figure out what went wrong with satellite * * * Problem arose several minutes into launch of a rocket carrying the satellite (CNN) -- NASA said early Tuesday that it failed to launch a satellite which would have monitored greenhouse gases to study how they affect the Earth's climate. The rocket carrying the satellite launched at 1:55 a.m. PT (4:55 a.m. ET) from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, but the "payload fairing failed to separate," according to a statement on NASA's Web site. The problems occurred several minutes into the launch. "We have declared a launch contingency, meaning that we did not have a successful launch tonight," said George Diller, an agency spokesman. Project crew members on the ground were trying to determine the cause. NASA scheduled a news conference for later in the morning to provide more details. The $273 million satellite, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, would have collected "precise global measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere" to help better forecast the changes in carbon dioxide "and the effect that these changes may have on the Earth's climate." How many more millions are they going to spend to re-do this? What a waste of resources. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
HA HA! NASA carbon satellite FAILS!
On Feb 24, 8:50*am, GW SCAM wrote:
Dear NASA; *Stay the Hell out of the global warming SCAM! *Explore SPACE instead, like you used to. Why in the world would ANYONE cheer the failure of a NASA satellite designed to provide accurate measurements of CO2 concentrations -- with an important piece of data that we're all fighting about? Whether you're an AGW Believer or an AGW Skeptic/Denier, isn't "good science" what we need to determine the truth about CO2 and climate change? And isn't good data part of what we need to do "good science"? The idea that we should be happy about the CO2 satellite crashing just sounds to me like a recommendation that we should do climate science in the future by relying on Roman priests examing the patterns of bird entrails. As for the idea that NASA should explore "outer space" -- places where most humans will never go -- to the exclusion of providing important information about conditions affecting the Earth, where most of us are always going to live -- that's daft. Thankfully, NASA expeditions and other efforts at exploring space have already helped in the development of weather satellites, communications satellites, etc. It's just perverse as well as utterly impractical to suggest that this is wrong, and that the only legitimate function of NASA is to explore conditions on Mars or Jupiter or Uranus. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
HA HA! NASA carbon satellite FAILS!
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:32:44 -0800 (PST), wrote:
How many more millions are they going to spend to re-do this? What a waste of resources. Money well spent. The failure of this satellite doesn't represent a "waste" of resources, it represents a "loss" of resources. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
HA HA! NASA carbon satellite FAILS!
wrote in message ... On Feb 24, 8:50 am, GW SCAM wrote: Dear NASA; Stay the Hell out of the global warming SCAM! Explore SPACE instead, like you used to. Why in the world would ANYONE cheer the failure of a NASA satellite designed to provide accurate measurements of CO2 concentrations -- with an important piece of data that we're all fighting about? Whether you're an AGW Believer or an AGW Skeptic/Denier, isn't "good science" what we need to determine the truth about CO2 and climate change? And isn't good data part of what we need to do "good science"? The idea that we should be happy about the CO2 satellite crashing just sounds to me like a recommendation that we should do climate science in the future by relying on Roman priests examing the patterns of bird entrails. As for the idea that NASA should explore "outer space" -- places where most humans will never go -- to the exclusion of providing important information about conditions affecting the Earth, where most of us are always going to live -- that's daft. Thankfully, NASA expeditions and other efforts at exploring space have already helped in the development of weather satellites, communications satellites, etc. It's just perverse as well as utterly impractical to suggest that this is wrong, and that the only legitimate function of NASA is to explore conditions on Mars or Jupiter or Uranus. ------------------------------- For once I agree with you somewhat. There is no point in cheering a failed launch. It's merely taxpayer money going down the drain. OTOH, there should be no missions based on the bias of a contoversial hypothesis such as GW. The scientific way would include an open discussion. It's no longer scientific now and most here know that it never was. It was a misleading, lying and exaggeration from the very beginning but it's hard to combat when the PR has been as heavy as this. The public hasn't fallen for it but since it's such a political thing now that anything to bolster the hypothesis is fine. If it doesn't do that, it's merely explained away as it has in the past. That makes it money down the drain as well, based on continued dogma. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carbon Satellite Lost on Launch | Bluuuue Rajah | Astronomy Misc | 21 | March 1st 09 02:01 AM |
Russkian satellite fails to reach orbit | snidely | Space Science Misc | 1 | October 28th 05 08:26 PM |
NASA Fails Again | Double-A | Misc | 5 | April 17th 05 02:03 PM |
NASA Fails To Account For Billions In Cost | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 7th 04 07:32 PM |