|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The night was still, the Moon was up ...
.... so it was time to bring out a 5" refractor and shoot the Moon. Here are some results: http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...7.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...0.jpg&caption= All images shot with AP 130F6.3 GT refractor using a cheap and cheerful QHY5-II video camera, images stacked with Registax, on the night of 5-27-2015. Views thru the eyepiece on this hazy warm humid night were incredibly detailed and 3-D looking. Uncalunie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The night was still, the Moon was up ...
Thanks Uncalunie! The 5" refractor and QHY5-II are evidently capable of getting along nicely with one another. It was good to see your sharp images of some of my 'old' lunar acquaintances.
Sketcher, To sketch is to see. On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 2:32:18 PM UTC-6, Uncarollo2 wrote: ... so it was time to bring out a 5" refractor and shoot the Moon. Here are some results: http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...7.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...0.jpg&caption= All images shot with AP 130F6.3 GT refractor using a cheap and cheerful QHY5-II video camera, images stacked with Registax, on the night of 5-27-2015. Views thru the eyepiece on this hazy warm humid night were incredibly detailed and 3-D looking. Uncalunie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The night was still, the Moon was up ...
On Saturday, 30 May 2015 22:32:18 UTC+2, Uncarollo2 wrote:
... so it was time to bring out a 5" refractor and shoot the Moon. Here are some results: All images shot with AP 130F6.3 GT refractor using a cheap and cheerful QHY5-II video camera, images stacked with Registax, on the night of 5-27-2015. Views thru the eyepiece on this hazy warm humid night were incredibly detailed and 3-D looking. Uncalunie Remarkable images. Well done. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The night was still, the Moon was up ...
Uncarollo2 wrote:
... so it was time to bring out a 5" refractor and shoot the Moon. Here are some results: http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...7.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...0.jpg&caption= All images shot with AP 130F6.3 GT refractor using a cheap and cheerful QHY5-II video camera, images stacked with Registax, on the night of 5-27-2015. Views thru the eyepiece on this hazy warm humid night were incredibly detailed and 3-D looking. Uncalunie Beautiful. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The night was still, the Moon was up ...
On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 9:32:18 PM UTC+1, Uncarollo2 wrote:
... so it was time to bring out a 5" refractor and shoot the Moon. Here are some results: http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...7.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...0.jpg&caption= All images shot with AP 130F6.3 GT refractor using a cheap and cheerful QHY5-II video camera, images stacked with Registax, on the night of 5-27-2015. Views thru the eyepiece on this hazy warm humid night were incredibly detailed and 3-D looking. Uncalunie Beautiful pictures - lousy description . Try - 'The moon came into view' or some variant on that grown-up theme. "He [Copernicus] thus speaks of "sunrise" and "sunset," of the "rising and setting" of the stars, of changes in the obliquity of the ecliptic and of variations in the equinoctial points, of the mean motion and variations in motion of the sun, and so on. All these things really relate to the earth, but since we are fixed to the earth and consequently share in its every motion, we cannot discover them in the earth directly, and are obliged to refer them to the heavenly bodies in which they make their appearance to us. Hence we name them as if they took place where they appear to us to take place; and from this one may see how natural it is to accommodate things to our customary way of seeing them." Galileo The guys who walked at the moon a number of decades ago didn't look 'down' at the Earth so we don't look 'up' at the moon and although the romantic description is beautiful and always will be, it will be far more beautiful among those who also have a sense of the motions of the Earth,the central Sun and all those things which give us a sense of of motion and place in the solar system. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The night was still, the Moon was up ...
oriel36 wrote:
On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 9:32:18 PM UTC+1, Uncarollo2 wrote: ... so it was time to bring out a 5" refractor and shoot the Moon. Here are some results: http://www.astromart.com/common/image_popup.asp?image=/images/forums/820000-820999/820637.jpg&caption http://www.astromart.com/common/image_popup.asp?image=/images/forums/820000-820999/820638.jpg&caption http://www.astromart.com/common/image_popup.asp?image=/images/forums/820000-820999/820618.jpg&caption http://www.astromart.com/common/image_popup.asp?image=/images/forums/820000-820999/820620.jpg&caption All images shot with AP 130F6.3 GT refractor using a cheap and cheerful QHY5-II video camera, images stacked with Registax, on the night of 5-27-2015. Views thru the eyepiece on this hazy warm humid night were incredibly detailed and 3-D looking. Uncalunie Beautiful pictures - lousy description . Try - 'The moon came into view' or some variant on that grown-up theme. "He [Copernicus] thus speaks of "sunrise" and "sunset," of the "rising and setting" of the stars, of changes in the obliquity of the ecliptic and of variations in the equinoctial points, of the mean motion and variations in motion of the sun, and so on. All these things really relate to the earth, but since we are fixed to the earth and consequently share in its every motion, we cannot discover them in the earth directly, and are obliged to refer them to the heavenly bodies in which they make their appearance to us. Hence we name them as if they took place where they appear to us to take place; and from this one may see how natural it is to accommodate things to our customary way of seeing them." Galileo The guys who walked at the moon a number of decades ago didn't look 'down' at the Earth so we don't look 'up' at the moon and although the romantic description is beautiful and always will be, it will be far more beautiful among those who also have a sense of the motions of the Earth,the central Sun and all those things which give us a sense of of motion and place in the solar system. Arrant nonsense. The lunar astronauts looked up at the Earth. Just as we look up at the Moon. https://m.facebook.com/OfficialAlanB...6461055940282/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The night was still, the Moon was up ...
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 12:07:22 AM UTC-5, Mike Collins wrote:
Uncarollo2 wrote: ... so it was time to bring out a 5" refractor and shoot the Moon. Here are some results: http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...7.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...0.jpg&caption= All images shot with AP 130F6.3 GT refractor using a cheap and cheerful QHY5-II video camera, images stacked with Registax, on the night of 5-27-2015. Views thru the eyepiece on this hazy warm humid night were incredibly detailed and 3-D looking. Uncalunie Beautiful. Thank you everybody. I figured since this was and astronomy newsgroup, we might want to do a bit of astronomy from time to time. Uncalunie |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The night was still, the Moon was up ...
On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 8:30:34 PM UTC+1, Uncarollo2 wrote:
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 12:07:22 AM UTC-5, Mike Collins wrote: Uncarollo2 wrote: ... so it was time to bring out a 5" refractor and shoot the Moon. Here are some results: http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...7.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...8.jpg&caption= http://www.astromart.com/common/imag...0.jpg&caption= All images shot with AP 130F6.3 GT refractor using a cheap and cheerful QHY5-II video camera, images stacked with Registax, on the night of 5-27-2015. Views thru the eyepiece on this hazy warm humid night were incredibly detailed and 3-D looking. Uncalunie Beautiful. Thank you everybody. I figured since this was and astronomy newsgroup, we might want to do a bit of astronomy from time to time. Uncalunie Try real astronomy when you are up for it - http://archive.org/stream/siderealme...ge/10/mode/2up Great having magnification power but you come from a community that thinks the moons spins as it orbits the Earth in direct conflict with the achievements of those men who first developed telescopes and the great astronomers who could put the appearance and traits of the moon in context. You are practicing photography and nothing else as it sure isn't astronomy. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Friday night's full Moon is the biggest and brightest full Moon ofthe year | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 28th 10 10:42 PM |
Moon last night | Andy Grove | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 9th 05 06:40 PM |
Last night's Moon | Pete Lawrence | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | September 18th 05 05:07 PM |
Last night's Moon | Pete Lawrence | UK Astronomy | 10 | September 18th 05 05:07 PM |
Moon last night | Greg Konkel | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 16th 03 02:09 AM |