ISS On-orbit Status, 20-07-2004

I asked Jacques multiple times to do so by email - PRIVATELY. He did
not reply to my emails nor did he comply with my requests. He also
ignored email requests from the moderator of sci.space.news


is NOT my e-mail address so if you send mail at that
addres I never received them....(I do not like spam so I do not post with my
real e-mail address)...I have my website URL under every post of mine, you
could find my real e-mail adress there...

so I never received your e-mails..as for those of the sci.space.news
moderator, but he has my real e-mail adress and I e-maild him to but he
never responded to me.....

Jacques :-)

www.spacepatches.info

"Jacques van Oene"
is NOT my e-mail address
Then it's a real pity you haven't changed it to something like
lid

"Jacques van Oene" wrote in message ...
I asked Jacques multiple times to do so by email - PRIVATELY. He did
not reply to my emails nor did he comply with my requests. He also
ignored email requests from the moderator of sci.space.news


is NOT my e-mail address so if you send mail at that
addres I never received them....(I do not like spam so I do not post with my
real e-mail address)...I have my website URL under every post of mine, you
could find my real e-mail adress there...

so I never received your e-mails..as for those of the sci.space.news
moderator, but he has my real e-mail adress and I e-maild him to but he
never responded to me.....

Jacques :-)

www.spacepatches.info


Gee, I did not receive any responses back from the dozen or so emails
I sent saying that this was not a valid email address.

Posting a fake email is no defense.

"Jeff Findley" wrote in message .. .
"K. Collier" wrote in message
ink.net...
Does anyone else have a hope of getting permission?

Keith - what happened to the spirit of making NASA news available for all
to
discuss? Afterall, that is how you got your start.

That's not the current state of affairs. History has shown that
publications about space don't tend to make much money. How many space
magazines have folded over the decades? Keith wants to protect his business
first and foremost.

Tagging NASA documents with "added" information allows Keith to do this
legally. This does prevent others from copying *his* added text and
reposting it without permission.


Jeff you do not know what you are talking about. The modified
document is a unique work and is protected under copyright law.

"Jeff Findley" wrote in message .. .
wrote in message
m...
(Derek Lyons) wrote in message
...
Does that imply permission would be forthcoming if asked for and the
appropriate attributions added?

Jacques does not have permission to post *any* copyright protected
material from SpaceRef.com - nor is such permission forthcoming.

However, nothing is stopping Jacques from posting one line messages which
are nothing more than a link to SpaceRef.com. That would not violate any
copyright. It has the added benefit that more people would be regularly
exposed to SpaceRef.com.

Jeff

Jacques is more than welcome to post a link.

"Jeff Findley" wrote in message .. .
"K. Collier" wrote in message
ink.net...
Does anyone else have a hope of getting permission?

Keith - what happened to the spirit of making NASA news available for all
to
discuss? Afterall, that is how you got your start.

That's not the current state of affairs. History has shown that
publications about space don't tend to make much money. How many space
magazines have folded over the decades? Keith wants to protect his business
first and foremost.

Tagging NASA documents with "added" information allows Keith to do this
legally. This does prevent others from copying *his* added text and
reposting it without permission.

Jeff


I just re-read your post and see that *my* earlier response was in
error. As such you DO understand copyright law ;-) My error - and my
apologies. I would send you an email but have no idea where to reach
you.

schreef in berichtnieuws

Jacques is more than welcome to post a link.


That is a change.....but I'm not interested in posting links, I'm interested
in the On Orbit Status Reports without the stuff you added to it....(I only
removed the stuff I thought was of non interest to the
newsgroup)......anyway if you change the 72 of the e-mail address in 71 than
you got the right e-mail adress and you can reach me....maybe we can work
something out here....or talk about it and not fight about it...that's no
good to anybody.....and perhaps you can resend the e-mails you send earlier,
I'm interested what you had to say to me.....




------
Jacques :-)

www.spacepatches.info

wrote:

"Jeff Findley" wrote in message .. .

Tagging NASA documents with "added" information allows Keith to do this
legally. This does prevent others from copying *his* added text and
reposting it without permission.


Jeff you do not know what you are talking about. The modified
document is a unique work and is protected under copyright law.

Kieth you lack reading comprehension. Your description of how he is
'wrong' is exactly what he wrote.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

wrote:

I just re-read your post and see that *my* earlier response was in
error. As such you DO understand copyright law ;-) My error - and my
apologies. I would send you an email but have no idea where to reach
you.

Argh. Now I need to apolofize for taking you to task for taking him
to task...

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

"Jeff Findley" wrote in message
...

"K. Collier" wrote in message
ink.net...
Does anyone else have a hope of getting permission?

Keith - what happened to the spirit of making NASA news available for
all
to
discuss? Afterall, that is how you got your start.

That's not the current state of affairs. History has shown that
publications about space don't tend to make much money. How many space
magazines have folded over the decades? Keith wants to protect his
business
first and foremost.

Tagging NASA documents with "added" information allows Keith to do this
legally. This does prevent others from copying *his* added text and
reposting it without permission.

Jeff
--
Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.



Well then I would ask Keith to post the news here... either adulterated or
unadulterated.