|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bangers Prove How Stupid They Are
"The most widely accepted scientific model for the origin of the
Universe is the Big Bang Theory. According to this model, scientists theorize that all energy, matter, and time began somewhere between 10 to 20 billion years ago. Models and observations do not account for conditions, if any, prior to the Big Bang." Statements by the astronomical community like "Models do not account for conditions "if any, prior to the Big Bang"...proves how utterly brainwashed they are. And this: "This red shift indicates that essentially all galaxies are moving away from each other". So much for colliding galaxies. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA Dumbass astronomers usually suffer from the notion that everyone is either dumber than them or equally stupid. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
F. Kuik another talking monkey related to Darwin wrote: Were you abused as a child? Maybe you should talk about that ... It might help solve your problems better than just letting out your frustrations in this way. In case you are still a child.... GROW UP! The world is filled with enough pop-psychobabble without another monkey on usenet sparing it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Were you abused as a child? Maybe you should talk about that ... It might
help solve your problems better than just letting out your frustrations in this way. In case you are still a child.... GROW UP! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Mad Scientist" schreef in bericht t.cable.rogers.com... F. Kuik another talking monkey related to Darwin wrote: Were you abused as a child? Maybe you should talk about that ... It might help solve your problems better than just letting out your frustrations in this way. In case you are still a child.... GROW UP! The world is filled with enough pop-psychobabble without another monkey on usenet sparing it. You are only trying to win arguements and tell ppl they're wrong or stupid. The point is to make ppl believe what you have to say. Prove would help. Maybe a well contructed math model. Just your emotional ****ty talk won't convince anyone you actually have something to say. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I am not the one stating with absolute certainty that there was a big
bang nor am I the one stating with absolute certainty that 'all galaxies are moving away from each other'. There was no big bang and that is easily proven, but talking monkeys are incapable of comprehension of the basic facts. So there is no point in posting those facts. In fact some of those facts were already posted and resulted only in insults. I can insult too, and will insult any bullies in here because unlike the monkey bullies, I am not bothered in the least by their brainwashed rants. F. Kuik wrote: "Mad Scientist" schreef in bericht t.cable.rogers.com... F. Kuik another talking monkey related to Darwin wrote: Were you abused as a child? Maybe you should talk about that ... It might help solve your problems better than just letting out your frustrations in this way. In case you are still a child.... GROW UP! The world is filled with enough pop-psychobabble without another monkey on usenet sparing it. You are only trying to win arguements and tell ppl they're wrong or stupid. The point is to make ppl believe what you have to say. Prove would help. Maybe a well contructed math model. Just your emotional ****ty talk won't convince anyone you actually have something to say. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Mad Scientist:
We realists, and would you believe, hobbyist astronomers, who only deal with perceptible, succinct and tersely expressed facts have a great deal of difficulty in comprehending your psychological expressions. Not all of us have the same psychologies. Our common language is logic, photons, and not psychological admonitions. Please ..... Give us a break and deal only with an economy of facts and logic. Thank you. Ralph Hertle .. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ralph Hertle wrote: Mad Scientist: We realists, and would you believe, hobbyist astronomers, who only deal with perceptible, succinct and tersely expressed facts have a great deal of difficulty in comprehending your psychological expressions. So now you 'percieve' the origin of the universe as per the utterly simplistic 'big bang'? Hahahahahahahah Not all of us have the same psychologies. Our common language is logic, photons, and not psychological admonitions. Please ..... Give us a break and deal only with an economy of facts and logic. Thank you. That was already tried and you imbeciles in alt.astronomy proved that facts are not what counts. I am not in the least suprised by this, brainwashed people don't know they are brainwashed. Ralph Hertle . |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
If you think they couldn't even understand the basic facts, that they're
brainwashed by all these complicated mathematicle outcomes, what's the point in telling them it's all different? All I'm saying is: if you think you know better... it's your job to explain ppl how it works... not telling them it doesnt work their way. If they couldn't understand, you have to find an other way to explain or just not bother about anyone having a different opinion at all. ps: you could try being more open for even incorrect theories... just a thought goodnight "Mad Scientist" schreef in bericht t.cable.rogers.com... I am not the one stating with absolute certainty that there was a big bang nor am I the one stating with absolute certainty that 'all galaxies are moving away from each other'. There was no big bang and that is easily proven, but talking monkeys are incapable of comprehension of the basic facts. So there is no point in posting those facts. In fact some of those facts were already posted and resulted only in insults. I can insult too, and will insult any bullies in here because unlike the monkey bullies, I am not bothered in the least by their brainwashed rants. F. Kuik wrote: "Mad Scientist" schreef in bericht t.cable.rogers.com... F. Kuik another talking monkey related to Darwin wrote: Were you abused as a child? Maybe you should talk about that ... It might help solve your problems better than just letting out your frustrations in this way. In case you are still a child.... GROW UP! The world is filled with enough pop-psychobabble without another monkey on usenet sparing it. You are only trying to win arguements and tell ppl they're wrong or stupid. The point is to make ppl believe what you have to say. Prove would help. Maybe a well contructed math model. Just your emotional ****ty talk won't convince anyone you actually have something to say. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
F. Kuik wrote: If you think they couldn't even understand the basic facts, that they're brainwashed by all these complicated mathematicle outcomes, what's the point in telling them it's all different? All I'm saying is: if you think you know better... it's your job to explain ppl how it works... not telling them it doesnt work their way. If they couldn't understand, you have to find an other way to explain or just not bother about anyone having a different opinion at all. Most of astronomy and cosmology is not dealing with the real universe, they are dealing with mathematics and trying so hard, they spend countless hours of 'scientific' scrutiny attempting to resolve the conflicts in their math. Meanwhile the universe carries on the way it always did, completely oblivious to the 'pronouncements' from astronomers and cosmologists. That is how the universes work. Likewise, I could say God doesn't care whether or not you 'agree' that he exists, its your loss, not his. Take SETI for example. Its not the problem with ET's communicating with earth man. Its the problem with earth man being too stupid to realize it. So the pronouncements by astronomers and SETI professionals that 'we haven't made contact yet' doesn't reflect on the capability of ET's, it reflects on earth man. In other words, the attitude is when contact occurs, its going to be how we assume it will occur based on our understanding. That is flatly wrong. It is so wrong, its laughable. ps: you could try being more open for even incorrect theories... just a thought Why be open to what I already know to be in error. The big bang is utter balderdash. It is math pulled entirely out of a hat, and has not basis in reality whatsoever. It reminds me of this astronomy show I watched the other night on TVO. I had to sit there and listen to some brainwashed idiot tell me, that we calculated 'all the mass in the universe'!!! Give me a break. Like as if anyone on earth can 'calculate all the mass in the universe'...unless of course s/he is just pulling numbers out of thin air, otherwise who are really practising some weird form of theology these days. Astronomers and cosmologists prove over and over again how they are no different than the simplistic brainwashed evolutionists which even Darwin said he didn't believe! Modern cosmology is really 'mad' science, nothing more and nothing less. What bothers me is when they try to pass it off as 'real' science. Its pathetic really. goodnight "Mad Scientist" schreef in bericht t.cable.rogers.com... I am not the one stating with absolute certainty that there was a big bang nor am I the one stating with absolute certainty that 'all galaxies are moving away from each other'. There was no big bang and that is easily proven, but talking monkeys are incapable of comprehension of the basic facts. So there is no point in posting those facts. In fact some of those facts were already posted and resulted only in insults. I can insult too, and will insult any bullies in here because unlike the monkey bullies, I am not bothered in the least by their brainwashed rants. F. Kuik wrote: "Mad Scientist" schreef in bericht .net.cable.rogers.com... F. Kuik another talking monkey related to Darwin wrote: Were you abused as a child? Maybe you should talk about that ... It might help solve your problems better than just letting out your frustrations in this way. In case you are still a child.... GROW UP! The world is filled with enough pop-psychobabble without another monkey on usenet sparing it. You are only trying to win arguements and tell ppl they're wrong or stupid. The point is to make ppl believe what you have to say. Prove would help. Maybe a well contructed math model. Just your emotional ****ty talk won't convince anyone you actually have something to say. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Mad Scientist wrote:
[BLOCK] That was already tried and you imbeciles in alt.astronomy proved that facts are not what counts. I am not in the least suprised by this, brainwashed people don't know they are brainwashed. Ralph Hertle M.S.: My suggestion: Don't deal with any morons. Deal only with the best minds that you can find. Period. In self defense. We lurkers do that. Ocassionally, you may want to ask questions. That doesn't necessarily mean that there are any people out there on AA with whom you may receive answers. Sometimes, a good question begets a good answer, and your comments would be welcomed. Please help us out here in lens-and-mirror-land. Thank you. Ralph Hertle .. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kooks of Alt.Astronomy Prove How Stupid They Are | Mad Scientist | Misc | 29 | August 11th 04 08:03 AM |
Alt.astronomy Kooks continue to prove how stupid they are! | Mad Scientist | Misc | 4 | August 10th 04 01:50 AM |
Instead of the parachute and bouncing balls, engineer a capsule that withstands the damage | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 31 | January 8th 04 12:13 AM |
MAN AS OLD AS COAL -- Catastrophic Evidence | Ed Conrad | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | July 10th 03 01:02 PM |
MAN AS OLD AS COAL -- Catastrophic Evidence | Ed Conrad | SETI | 20 | July 10th 03 01:02 PM |