|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
Paleoanthropology Division
Smithsonian Institute 207 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20078 Dear Mr Conrad: Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post. Hominid skull." We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents "conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years ago." Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie doll, of the variety one of our staff, who has small children, believes to be the "Malibu Barbie". It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings. However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen which might have tipped you off to it's modern origin: 1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically fossilized bone. 2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified proto-hominids. 3. The dentition pattern evident on the "skull" is more consistent with the common domesticated dog than it is with the "ravenous man-eating Pliocene clams" you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time. This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much detail, let us say that: A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has chewed on. B. Clams don't have teeth. It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request to have the specimen carbon dated. This is partially due to the heavy load our lab must bear in it's normal operation, and partly due to carbon dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior to 1956 AD, and carbon dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results. Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National Science Foundation's Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning your specimen the scientific name "Australopithecus spiff-arino." Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be Latin. However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a hominid fossil, it is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institution, and the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have discovered in your back yard. We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for it. We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories surrounding the "trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in a structural matrix" that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty 9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench. Yours in Science, Harvey Rowe Curator, Antiquities |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
Rich Travsky wrote: Brilliant! :-D Pat |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
Pat Flannery wrote: Rich Travsky wrote: Brilliant! :-D Let me rephrase that... I'm an amateur paleontologist, and that's one of the funniest things I've ever read in my entire life. Did you write that? Pat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
Rich Travsky (aka Third Reich collaborator on behalf of the Smithsonian
Institute), I'm afraid that our honest Ed Conrad isn't the problem here. What's your obviously incest and LLPOF buttology problem? Rich Travsky wrote: : Paleoanthropology Division : Smithsonian Institute : 207 Pennsylvania Avenue : Washington, DC 20078 : Yours in Science, : : Harvey Rowe : Curator, Antiquities - Brad Guth Rich Travsky wrote: Paleoanthropology Division Smithsonian Institute 207 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20078 Dear Mr Conrad: Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post. Hominid skull." We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents "conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years ago." Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie doll, of the variety one of our staff, who has small children, believes to be the "Malibu Barbie". It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings. However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen which might have tipped you off to it's modern origin: 1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically fossilized bone. 2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified proto-hominids. 3. The dentition pattern evident on the "skull" is more consistent with the common domesticated dog than it is with the "ravenous man-eating Pliocene clams" you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time. This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much detail, let us say that: A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has chewed on. B. Clams don't have teeth. It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request to have the specimen carbon dated. This is partially due to the heavy load our lab must bear in it's normal operation, and partly due to carbon dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior to 1956 AD, and carbon dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results. Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National Science Foundation's Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning your specimen the scientific name "Australopithecus spiff-arino." Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be Latin. However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a hominid fossil, it is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institution, and the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have discovered in your back yard. We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for it. We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories surrounding the "trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in a structural matrix" that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty 9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench. Yours in Science, Harvey Rowe Curator, Antiquities |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
Pat Flannery wrote:
Pat Flannery wrote: Rich Travsky wrote: Brilliant! :-D Let me rephrase that... I'm an amateur paleontologist, and that's one of the funniest things I've ever read in my entire life. Did you write that? No, it's been floating around the net for a few years. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
Rich Travsky wrote in news:44C7C203.5F5A9855
@hotmMOVEail.com: Pat Flannery wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: Rich Travsky wrote: Brilliant! :-D Let me rephrase that... I'm an amateur paleontologist, and that's one of the funniest things I've ever read in my entire life. Did you write that? No, it's been floating around the net for a few years. It may not have been yours, but reposting it in reply to an Ed Conrad rant was certainly inspired. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
Bradley E Guth Brown Nosed Kook 4410 SE Nelson Rd. Olalla, WA 98359 Birthday: March 19th, 1946 253-857-6061 253-857-5318 Looks like a trailer park, lots of addresses at this location. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote in news:44C7C203.5F5A9855 @hotmMOVEail.com: Pat Flannery wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: Rich Travsky wrote: Brilliant! :-D Let me rephrase that... I'm an amateur paleontologist, and that's one of the funniest things I've ever read in my entire life. Did you write that? No, it's been floating around the net for a few years. It may not have been yours, but reposting it in reply to an Ed Conrad rant was certainly inspired. I've done it a couple of times to him. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
THE WORLD'S OLDEST HUMAN SKULL
" wrote in message
oups.com Bradley E Guth Brown Nosed Kook 4410 SE Nelson Rd. Olalla, WA 98359 Birthday: March 19th, 1946 253-857-6061 253-857-5318 Looks like a trailer park, lots of addresses at this location. You are so freaking pathetic, just like the good little Third Reich collaborating Jew that you are. So, why don't you stop by, or even call? At least Ed Conrad and myself actually exist as real folks. How about yourself? - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HUMAN EVOLUTION? UP YOUR'S! ... Bones of Contention & 5-inch Tall Woman. | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 18th 05 10:43 AM |
Ho! Ho! HUMBUG! | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 14th 04 01:34 PM |
Stink Signifies the S in Science | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 9 | November 6th 04 01:00 PM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 3 | May 22nd 04 09:07 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Station | 0 | May 21st 04 08:02 AM |