A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Unification of physics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 26th 11, 04:02 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
kenseto[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 418
Default Unification of physics

The paper in the following links presents a unified theory called
Model Mechanics.
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011unification.xps
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011unification.pdf
Model Mechanics unites all the forces of nature including gravity. It
gives rise to a new theory of relativity called IRt and a new theory
of gravity called DTG. IRT in combination with DTG resolve the
following problematic observations experienced current theories:
1. accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe.
2. Dark matter.
3. Dark energy.
4. The horizon problem.
5. The faltness problem.
6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.
  #2  
Old April 26th 11, 04:46 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Dirk Van de moortel[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 95
Default Unification of physics


"kenseto" wrote in message ...
The paper in the following links presents a unified theory called
Model Mechanics.
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011unification.xps
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011unification.pdf
Model Mechanics unites all the forces of nature including gravity. It
gives rise to a new theory of relativity called IRt and a new theory
of gravity called DTG. IRT in combination with DTG resolve the
following problematic observations experienced current theories:
1. accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe.
2. Dark matter.
3. Dark energy.
4. The horizon problem.
5. The faltness problem.
6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The collected Kes Neto Faltness Anormalie papers available at
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...etoPapers.html ,
endorsed by Professor Ian P. Freely of the University of S****horpe.

Dirk Vdm
  #3  
Old April 26th 11, 06:00 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Sam Wormley[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,966
Default Unification of physics

On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:
6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics

http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...puter-graphics

"The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually
take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are
slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back.
The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are
slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra
billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall
outside our understanding of physics.

"There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden
effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that
gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating
the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside
when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able
to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations
revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the
anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved.

"That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and
Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous
calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat
reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique
first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how
the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it
would then travel".

See:
http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...puter-graphics

  #4  
Old April 26th 11, 09:03 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
dlzc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Unification of physics

Dear Sam Wormley:

On Apr 26, 10:00*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:

6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks
to 1970s computer graphics

....
"There was much speculation on the sorts strange
and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing
this, including the exotic idea that gravity
itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances
separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These
by and large fell by the wayside when physicists
realized the heat produced by the probes might be
able to account for the extra deceleration. But
even then, calculations revealed thermal effects
could only account for about two-thirds of the
anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved.

"That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute
for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture.
They realized that all the previous calculations
had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any
heat reflected back at the probes. They used a
computer modeling technique first developed in the
1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how
the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in
which direction it would then travel".

See:

snip link now broken by Google.Groups

Thanks, Sam.

This also answers whether or not photons actually carry linear
momentum (the Crooke's Radiometer "question").

I thought there was still some residual question in that the
acceleration was constant, whereas the decay rate / heat production of
the radioisotopes decreased with time... ?

David A. Smith
  #5  
Old April 27th 11, 02:17 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
kenseto[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 418
Default Unification of physics

On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:

6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics

http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks...

"The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually
take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are
slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back.
The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are
slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra
billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall
outside our understanding of physics.


Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict.


"There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden
effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that
gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating
the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside
when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able
to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations
revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the
anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved.


Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer
anomaly.


"That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and
Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous
calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat
reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique
first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how
the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it
would then travel".


These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the
current theories.

Ken Seto


See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks....


  #6  
Old April 27th 11, 02:24 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Sam Wormley[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,966
Default Unification of physics

On 4/27/11 8:17 AM, kenseto wrote:
On Apr 26, 1:00 pm, Sam wrote:
On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:

6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics

http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks...

"The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually
take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are
slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back.
The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are
slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra
billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall
outside our understanding of physics.


Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict.


"There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden
effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that
gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating
the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside
when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able
to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations
revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the
anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved.


Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer
anomaly.


Which just goes to show that "model mechanics" was wrong again!
Now you have to un-patch "model mechanics" because good old
Newtonian mechanics was right all along on for observations of
Pioneer spacecraft.



"That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and
Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous
calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat
reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique
first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how
the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it
would then travel".


These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the
current theories.

Ken Seto


See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks...



  #7  
Old April 27th 11, 02:48 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,572
Default Unification of physics

On Apr 27, 8:17*am, kenseto wrote:
On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:

On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:


6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics


http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks...


"The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually
take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are
slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back.
The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are
slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra
billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall
outside our understanding of physics.


Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict.



"There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden
effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that
gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating
the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside
when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able
to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations
revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the
anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved.


Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer
anomaly.



"That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and
Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous
calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat
reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique
first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how
the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it
would then travel".


These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the
current theories.


Of course they are in the provision of current theories, Ken. That's
what the announced results are about. It really is sad that a) you
can't keep up with the experimental results, and b) you cling to
problems and refuse to believe it when they are resolved.


Ken Seto



See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks...




  #8  
Old April 27th 11, 03:28 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
kenseto[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 418
Default Unification of physics

On Apr 27, 9:48*am, PD wrote:
On Apr 27, 8:17*am, kenseto wrote:





On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:


On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:


6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics


http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks....


"The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually
take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are
slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back.
The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are
slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra
billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall
outside our understanding of physics.


Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict.


"There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden
effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that
gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating
the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside
when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able
to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations
revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the
anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved.


Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer
anomaly.


"That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and
Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous
calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat
reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique
first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how
the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it
would then travel".


These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the
current theories.


Of course they are in the provision of current theories, Ken. That's
what the announced results are about. It really is sad that a) you
can't keep up with the experimental results, and b) you cling to
problems and refuse to believe it when they are resolved.



Hey idiot....they wouldn't call it the pioneer anomaly if it is within
the provisions of the current theories. These are add-ons
(epicycles)outside of the current theories.





Ken Seto


See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...ved-thanks...- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


  #9  
Old April 27th 11, 03:37 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,572
Default Unification of physics

On Apr 27, 9:28*am, kenseto wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:48*am, PD wrote:



On Apr 27, 8:17*am, kenseto wrote:


On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:


On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:


6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics


http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks...


"The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually
take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are
slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back.
The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are
slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra
billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall
outside our understanding of physics.


Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict.


"There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden
effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that
gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating
the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside
when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able
to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations
revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the
anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved.


Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer
anomaly.


"That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and
Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous
calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat
reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique
first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how
the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it
would then travel".


These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the
current theories.


Of course they are in the provision of current theories, Ken. That's
what the announced results are about. It really is sad that a) you
can't keep up with the experimental results, and b) you cling to
problems and refuse to believe it when they are resolved.


Hey idiot....they wouldn't call it the pioneer anomaly if it is within
the provisions of the current theories. These are add-ons
(epicycles)outside of the current theories.


Ken, you are using OLD, OUTDATED information. The Pioneer anomaly is
no longer an anomaly now that it is understood and it is no longer
called the Pioneer anomaly.




Ken Seto


See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-thanks...Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -




  #10  
Old April 27th 11, 07:19 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
kenseto[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 418
Default Unification of physics

On Apr 27, 10:37*am, PD wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:28*am, kenseto wrote:





On Apr 27, 9:48*am, PD wrote:


On Apr 27, 8:17*am, kenseto wrote:


On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:


On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:


6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem.


The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics


http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks...


"The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually
take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are
slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back.
The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are
slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra
billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall
outside our understanding of physics.


Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict.


"There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden
effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that
gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating
the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside
when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able
to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations
revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the
anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved.


Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer
anomaly.


"That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and
Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous
calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat
reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique
first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how
the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it
would then travel".


These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the
current theories.


Of course they are in the provision of current theories, Ken. That's
what the announced results are about. It really is sad that a) you
can't keep up with the experimental results, and b) you cling to
problems and refuse to believe it when they are resolved.


Hey idiot....they wouldn't call it the pioneer anomaly if it is within
the provisions of the current theories. These are add-ons
(epicycles)outside of the current theories.


Ken, you are using OLD, OUTDATED information. The Pioneer anomaly is
no longer an anomaly now that it is understood and it is no longer
called the Pioneer anomaly.


Assertion is not a valid arguement.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GRAND UNIFICATION HYPOTHESIS cosmojoe Astronomy Misc 0 July 18th 09 01:57 AM
GRAND UNIFICATION HYPOTHESIS cosmojoe Misc 0 July 18th 09 01:50 AM
#18 Logically, you cannot have a force of gravity ; monograph-book:UNIFICATION OF THE FORCES OF PHYSICS AS A COULOMB UNIFICATION a_plutonium[_1_] Astronomy Misc 0 February 26th 08 04:09 AM
Unification of Physics kenseto[_1_] Astronomy Misc 1 February 12th 08 12:34 AM
New Book - Unification of Electromagnetism and Gravity Available Now! Fusioneer Astronomy Misc 40 March 19th 05 01:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.