|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
The paper in the following links presents a unified theory called
Model Mechanics. http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011unification.xps http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011unification.pdf Model Mechanics unites all the forces of nature including gravity. It gives rise to a new theory of relativity called IRt and a new theory of gravity called DTG. IRT in combination with DTG resolve the following problematic observations experienced current theories: 1. accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe. 2. Dark matter. 3. Dark energy. 4. The horizon problem. 5. The faltness problem. 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
"kenseto" wrote in message ... The paper in the following links presents a unified theory called Model Mechanics. http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011unification.xps http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011unification.pdf Model Mechanics unites all the forces of nature including gravity. It gives rise to a new theory of relativity called IRt and a new theory of gravity called DTG. IRT in combination with DTG resolve the following problematic observations experienced current theories: 1. accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe. 2. Dark matter. 3. Dark energy. 4. The horizon problem. 5. The faltness problem. 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The collected Kes Neto Faltness Anormalie papers available at http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...etoPapers.html , endorsed by Professor Ian P. Freely of the University of S****horpe. Dirk Vdm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote:
6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...puter-graphics "The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back. The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall outside our understanding of physics. "There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved. "That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it would then travel". See: http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...puter-graphics |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
Dear Sam Wormley:
On Apr 26, 10:00*am, Sam Wormley wrote: On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote: 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics .... "There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved. "That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it would then travel". See: snip link now broken by Google.Groups Thanks, Sam. This also answers whether or not photons actually carry linear momentum (the Crooke's Radiometer "question"). I thought there was still some residual question in that the acceleration was constant, whereas the decay rate / heat production of the radioisotopes decreased with time... ? David A. Smith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote: 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks... "The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back. The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall outside our understanding of physics. Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict. "There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved. Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer anomaly. "That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it would then travel". These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the current theories. Ken Seto See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
On 4/27/11 8:17 AM, kenseto wrote:
On Apr 26, 1:00 pm, Sam wrote: On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote: 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks... "The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back. The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall outside our understanding of physics. Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict. "There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved. Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer anomaly. Which just goes to show that "model mechanics" was wrong again! Now you have to un-patch "model mechanics" because good old Newtonian mechanics was right all along on for observations of Pioneer spacecraft. "That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it would then travel". These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the current theories. Ken Seto See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
On Apr 27, 8:17*am, kenseto wrote:
On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote: 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks... "The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back. The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall outside our understanding of physics. Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict. "There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved. Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer anomaly. "That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it would then travel". These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the current theories. Of course they are in the provision of current theories, Ken. That's what the announced results are about. It really is sad that a) you can't keep up with the experimental results, and b) you cling to problems and refuse to believe it when they are resolved. Ken Seto See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
On Apr 27, 9:48*am, PD wrote:
On Apr 27, 8:17*am, kenseto wrote: On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote: 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks.... "The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back. The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall outside our understanding of physics. Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict. "There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved. Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer anomaly. "That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it would then travel". These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the current theories. Of course they are in the provision of current theories, Ken. That's what the announced results are about. It really is sad that a) you can't keep up with the experimental results, and b) you cling to problems and refuse to believe it when they are resolved. Hey idiot....they wouldn't call it the pioneer anomaly if it is within the provisions of the current theories. These are add-ons (epicycles)outside of the current theories. Ken Seto See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...ved-thanks...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
On Apr 27, 9:28*am, kenseto wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:48*am, PD wrote: On Apr 27, 8:17*am, kenseto wrote: On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote: 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks... "The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back. The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall outside our understanding of physics. Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict. "There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved. Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer anomaly. "That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it would then travel". These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the current theories. Of course they are in the provision of current theories, Ken. That's what the announced results are about. It really is sad that a) you can't keep up with the experimental results, and b) you cling to problems and refuse to believe it when they are resolved. Hey idiot....they wouldn't call it the pioneer anomaly if it is within the provisions of the current theories. These are add-ons (epicycles)outside of the current theories. Ken, you are using OLD, OUTDATED information. The Pioneer anomaly is no longer an anomaly now that it is understood and it is no longer called the Pioneer anomaly. Ken Seto See:http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-thanks...Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Unification of physics
On Apr 27, 10:37*am, PD wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:28*am, kenseto wrote: On Apr 27, 9:48*am, PD wrote: On Apr 27, 8:17*am, kenseto wrote: On Apr 26, 1:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 4/26/11 10:02 AM, kenseto wrote: 6. The pioneer 10 anormalie problem. The Pioneer Anomaly is finally solved, thanks to 1970s computer graphics http://io9.com/#!5788543/the-pioneer...-solved-thanks... "The Pioneer probes are both on escape trajectories that will eventually take them out of the solar system. They're travelling fast, but both are slightly decelerating because the Sun's gravity is pulling them back. The so-called Pioneer Anomaly comes from the fact that both probes are slowing down slightly more than they ought to. It's less than an extra billionth of a meter per second squared, but that's still enough to fall outside our understanding of physics. Right....so it is an anomaly that current theories did not predict. "There was much speculation on the sorts strange and bizarre hidden effects that could be causing this, including the exotic idea that gravity itself somehow becomes stronger over the distances separating the Sun from the Pioneer probes. These by and large fell by the wayside when physicists realized the heat produced by the probes might be able to account for the extra deceleration. But even then, calculations revealed thermal effects could only account for about two-thirds of the anomaly, still leaving the basic mystery unsolved. Model mechanics includes a physical explanation for the Pioneer anomaly. "That's where researchers at Portugal's Institute for Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion enter the picture. They realized that all the previous calculations had only looked at the heat emitted, ignoring any heat reflected back at the probes. They used a computer modeling technique first developed in the 1970s known as Phong shading to figure out how the heat would reflect off the spacecraft and in which direction it would then travel". These are pure speculations and not within the provision of the current theories. Of course they are in the provision of current theories, Ken. That's what the announced results are about. It really is sad that a) you can't keep up with the experimental results, and b) you cling to problems and refuse to believe it when they are resolved. Hey idiot....they wouldn't call it the pioneer anomaly if it is within the provisions of the current theories. These are add-ons (epicycles)outside of the current theories. Ken, you are using OLD, OUTDATED information. The Pioneer anomaly is no longer an anomaly now that it is understood and it is no longer called the Pioneer anomaly. Assertion is not a valid arguement. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GRAND UNIFICATION HYPOTHESIS | cosmojoe | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 18th 09 01:57 AM |
GRAND UNIFICATION HYPOTHESIS | cosmojoe | Misc | 0 | July 18th 09 01:50 AM |
#18 Logically, you cannot have a force of gravity ; monograph-book:UNIFICATION OF THE FORCES OF PHYSICS AS A COULOMB UNIFICATION | a_plutonium[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 26th 08 04:09 AM |
Unification of Physics | kenseto[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 12th 08 12:34 AM |
New Book - Unification of Electromagnetism and Gravity Available Now! | Fusioneer | Astronomy Misc | 40 | March 19th 05 01:17 PM |