A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe

On 2/20/13 3:00 PM, kenseto wrote:
A new theory does not require to follow history.

Seto, any new theory must accurately account for historical
observation as well as make new testable predictions.

On Feb 20, 4:03*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/20/13 3:00 PM, kenseto wrote:

A new theory does not require to follow history.

* *Seto, any new theory must accurately account for historical
* *observation as well as make new testable predictions.

Yes ...It must include past accurate predictions of past theories.
So what is your point?

On 2/20/2013 3:00 PM, kenseto wrote:

oh, i don't know about that not-awarding-a-prize business. einstein was
awarded a nobel prize for the theory accounting for the photoelectric
effect, which was something that had been observed (again a surprise)
decades earlier. same thing for the nobel prize awarded to bardeen and
cooper for the theory of superconductivity, years after
superconductivity was observed experimentally. on the other hand, awards
were given to the fellas that found a planet neptune experimentally,
even though it was predicted using newtonian gravity from two centuries
previous.

maybe you just don't have a clue how science works.

The point is:
Current theories don't predict accelerated expansion....you scientists
fudged by adding
the repulsive CC to make the current theories fit observations.

the point is:
your arguments are full of **** and reveals that you don't know how
science works. things have happened historically that you say shouldn't
be possible to happen.

The point is you are a piece of ****. A new theory does not require to
follow history.


nor does a theory have to follow the rules you invent for it. as history
shows. it has never followed the rules you imagine it should. that's
because you don't have a clue how science works.

On Feb 20, 8:16*pm, Absolutely Vertical
wrote:
On 2/20/2013 3:00 PM, kenseto wrote:





oh, i don't know about that not-awarding-a-prize business. einstein was
awarded a nobel prize for the theory accounting for the photoelectric
effect, which was something that had been observed (again a surprise)
decades earlier. same thing for the nobel prize awarded to bardeen and
cooper for the theory of superconductivity, years after
superconductivity was observed experimentally. on the other hand, awards
were given to the fellas that found a planet neptune experimentally,
even though it was predicted using newtonian gravity from two centuries
previous.

maybe you just don't have a clue how science works.

The point is:
Current theories don't predict accelerated expansion....you scientists
fudged by adding
the repulsive CC to make the current theories fit observations.

the point is:
your arguments are full of **** and reveals that you don't know how
science works. things have happened historically that you say shouldn't
be possible to happen.

The point is you are a piece of ****. A new theory does not require to
follow history.

nor does a theory have to follow the rules you invent for it. as history
shows. it has never followed the rules you imagine it should. that's
because you don't have a clue how science works.

What are the rules that you claimed that I invented?

What are the rules that you claimed that I invented?

ken, are you on (new) meds? Lately, your writing skills and arguments
are better and make more sense than usual.

On 2/21/2013 9:16 AM, kenseto wrote:


The point is:
Current theories don't predict accelerated expansion....you scientists
fudged by adding
the repulsive CC to make the current theories fit observations.

the point is:
your arguments are full of **** and reveals that you don't know how
science works. things have happened historically that you say shouldn't
be possible to happen.

The point is you are a piece of ****. A new theory does not require to
follow history.

nor does a theory have to follow the rules you invent for it. as history
shows. it has never followed the rules you imagine it should. that's
because you don't have a clue how science works.

What are the rules that you claimed that I invented?


that they won't give nobel prizes to proposers of theories that make
postdictions.