|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On 2/18/13 11:27 PM, John Gogo wrote:
On Feb 18, 11:22 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: 1. The observed accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe disagrees with the predictions. How so? What is the prediction? What are the observations? Our mathematics is useless without our ability to predict. Give me an example. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On Feb 19, 9:54*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/19/13 8:45 AM, kenseto wrote: On Feb 18, 11:27 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 5:22 PM, kenseto wrote: On Feb 18, 4:52 pm, Sam *wrote: On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: A paper entitled "The Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics" is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011universe.pdf * * Your paper still has the same flaws as the last time you posted this. * * In the second sentence of the Abstract, you write, "Space is occupied * * by a stationary ... E-Matrix" -- Stationary with respect to what, * * Seto? Stationary wrt all the objects moving within it (the E-Matrix) * * Bzzzt! Ding! Doesn't work Seto. Hey idiot.....it works. A stationary observer in the E-Matrix frame is like an SR observer in an inertial frame. What this mean is that SR claims the exclusive properties of the E-Matrix frame to do physics. That's why SR is incomplete....because no SR observer is at rest in the E-Matrix frame. * *Sounds like mumbo-jumbo to me. I'm sticking with something that agrees * *with observation and experiment -- special relativity I see .....so you elected to stay stupid. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On Feb 19, 12:22*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: 1. The observed accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe disagrees with the predictions. * *How so? What is the prediction? What are the observations? Current theories do not predict the accelerated expansion of the universe. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On 2/19/13 10:44 AM, kenseto wrote:
On Feb 19, 9:54 am, Sam Wormley wrote: Sounds like mumbo-jumbo to me. I'm sticking with something that agrees with observation and experiment -- special relativity I see .....so you elected to stay stupid. You are not the last to accuse me of being stupid, Seto. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On Feb 19, 9:55*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/18/13 11:27 PM, John Gogo wrote: On Feb 18, 11:22 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: 1. The observed accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe disagrees with the predictions. * * How so? What is the prediction? What are the observations? Our mathematics is useless without our ability to predict. * *Give me an example. Falied to predict accelerated expansion of the universe. failed to predict the galactic motion correctly. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On 2/19/13 10:45 AM, kenseto wrote:
On Feb 19, 12:22 am, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: 1. The observed accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe disagrees with the predictions. How so? What is the prediction? What are the observations? Current theories do not predict the accelerated expansion of the universe. There is a version of General Relativity, that does indeed model the accelerated expansion of the universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On 2/19/13 10:47 AM, kenseto wrote:
On Feb 19, 9:55 am, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 11:27 PM, John Gogo wrote: On Feb 18, 11:22 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: 1. The observed accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe disagrees with the predictions. How so? What is the prediction? What are the observations? Our mathematics is useless without our ability to predict. Give me an example. Falied to predict accelerated expansion of the universe. failed to predict the galactic motion correctly. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On 2/19/2013 10:45 AM, kenseto wrote:
On Feb 19, 12:22 am, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: 1. The observed accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe disagrees with the predictions. How so? What is the prediction? What are the observations? Current theories do not predict the accelerated expansion of the universe. yes they do. what makes you think they don't? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On Feb 19, 11:59*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/19/13 10:47 AM, kenseto wrote: On Feb 19, 9:55 am, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 11:27 PM, John Gogo wrote: On Feb 18, 11:22 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: 1. The observed accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe disagrees with the predictions. * * *How so? What is the prediction? What are the observations? Our mathematics is useless without our ability to predict. * * Give me an example. Falied to predict accelerated expansion of the universe. failed to predict the galactic motion correctly. * *See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model- Cosmological constant and cold dark matters are add on epicyles....that is post-diction not prediction. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory on the Origin of Our Universe
On Feb 19, 11:57*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/19/13 10:45 AM, kenseto wrote: On Feb 19, 12:22 am, Sam Wormley wrote: On 2/18/13 2:58 PM, kenseto wrote: 1. The observed accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of the universe disagrees with the predictions. * * How so? What is the prediction? What are the observations? Current theories do not predict the accelerated expansion of the universe. * *There is a version of General Relativity, that does indeed model the * *accelerated expansion of the universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model- Post-dictions don't count. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt22 Dirac new radioactivities would also prove this theory #228Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 31st 09 03:48 AM |
Nebular Dust Cloud theory has contradictions #146; 3rd ed; AtomTotality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 15th 09 08:17 AM |
MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book: ATOMTOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 8 | May 20th 09 01:17 AM |
Farm Theory, Also Called, Spring Theory, Yard Theory And TheEvolution Of Our Universe | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 29th 08 01:11 PM |
Origin of the universe. | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 31st 06 07:34 PM |