A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Journal of Gravitational Physics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 1st 07, 10:21 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

On 1 Nov, 05:22, alexis wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
Ashcat Publishers, Inc. like to invite everybody to participate in
our Journal of Gravitational Physics

The Journal of Gravitational Physics is devoted to all aspects of
classical and quantum gravitational physics.

JGP presents letters, research papers, rapid communications, review
articles and comments on theoretical and experimental aspects of
gravitational theories and its extensions, as well as related
mathematical topics.
The Journal includes topics on General Relativity and its extensions;
Numerical relativity; Experimental gravitational physics; Classical
and quantum cosmology; Quantum field theory in curved space-time;
Supergravity; Gravitational aspects of string theory; Quantum gravity;
and History and Teaching of gravitational physics.

Details on Manuscript submission are available on

www.jgponline.co.cc

We would welcome the opportunity of working with you.

I look forward to learning your thoughts on this
idea.

Sincerely yours,

Ashley Owens
Editor-in-Chief
Journal of Gravitational Physics


Is your journal going to worship Einstein's idiocies, e.g.
gravitational time dilation? If you do not belong to Einstein criminal
cult and want to prove this, just publish in the journal a text
equivalent to the following one:

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp "The first confirmation of a
long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a
previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the
speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational
field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated:"In the second
place our result shows that, according to the general theory of
relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in
vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the
special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently
referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special
Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called
mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that
the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT FACTOR."

Pentcho Valev


  #2  
Old November 1st 07, 02:15 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_65_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

Dear Pentcho Valev:

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...
....
www.jgponline.co.cc

....
Is your journal going to worship Einstein's idiocies, e.g.


If you have visited their website, you might want to scan your
computer for cookies, spybots, and other malware. This website
is ostensibly cited on a couple of atolls out in the Indian
Ocean.

David A. Smith


  #3  
Old November 1st 07, 03:06 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Chris O'Riordan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

On Nov 1, 5:15 am, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"
wrote:
Dear Pentcho Valev:

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message

ups.com...
...

www.jgponline.co.cc

...
Is your journal going to worship Einstein's idiocies, e.g.


If you have visited their website, you might want to scan your
computer for cookies, spybots, and other malware.


Or any damn website for that matter.

David A. Smith



  #4  
Old November 2nd 07, 12:54 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

On Nov 1, 5:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On 1 Nov, 05:22, alexis wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:





Ashcat Publishers, Inc. like to invite everybody to participate in
our Journal of Gravitational Physics


The Journal of Gravitational Physics is devoted to all aspects of
classical and quantum gravitational physics.


JGP presents letters, research papers, rapid communications, review
articles and comments on theoretical and experimental aspects of
gravitational theories and its extensions, as well as related
mathematical topics.
The Journal includes topics on General Relativity and its extensions;
Numerical relativity; Experimental gravitational physics; Classical
and quantum cosmology; Quantum field theory in curved space-time;
Supergravity; Gravitational aspects of string theory; Quantum gravity;
and History and Teaching of gravitational physics.


Details on Manuscript submission are available on


www.jgponline.co.cc


We would welcome the opportunity of working with you.


I look forward to learning your thoughts on this
idea.


Sincerely yours,


Ashley Owens
Editor-in-Chief
Journal of Gravitational Physics


Is your journal going to worship Einstein's idiocies, e.g.
gravitational time dilation? If you do not belong to Einstein criminal
cult and want to prove this, just publish in the journal a text
equivalent to the following one:

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp"The first confirmation of a
long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a
previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the
speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational
field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated:"In the second
place our result shows that, according to the general theory of
relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in
vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the
special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently
referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special
Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called
mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that
the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT FACTOR."

Pentcho Valev- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Once again you have posted a link to a website containing total
bull****.

What a surprise!

Harry C.


  #5  
Old November 2nd 07, 03:16 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
dlzc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

Dear Pentcho Valev:

On Nov 1, 2:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
....
http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"The first confirmation of a long range variation
in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964.

....
Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the
second place our result shows that,


Pentcho, do you actually use that grey matter between your shoulders?

This result was obtained in 1964. Albert Einstein died in 1955. So
either he arose from the grave, or they are referring to Bruce
Einstein, the janitor.

David A. Smith

  #6  
Old November 2nd 07, 03:48 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

On 2 Nov, 16:16, dlzc wrote:
Dear Pentcho Valev:

On Nov 1, 2:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
...

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"The first confirmation of a long range variation
in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964.

...
Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the
second place our result shows that,


Pentcho, do you actually use that grey matter between your shoulders?

This result was obtained in 1964. Albert Einstein died in 1955. So
either he arose from the grave, or they are referring to Bruce
Einstein, the janitor.

David A. Smith


Zombie has discovered a verbal ambiguity ("this evidence" is somewhat
misleading). Bravo zombie! Now it is time for zombie to start thinking
of the implications of the VARIABILITY of the speed of light Einstein
introduced in Chapter 22 in his 1920 "Relativity".

Pentcho Valev

  #7  
Old November 2nd 07, 06:41 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
dlzc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

On Nov 2, 7:48 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On 2 Nov, wrote:
On Nov 1, 2:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
...


http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"The first confirmation of a long range variation
in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964.

...
Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the
second place our result shows that,


Pentcho, do you actually use that grey matter between
your shoulders?


This result was obtained in 1964. Albert Einstein
died in 1955. So either he arose from the grave, or
they are referring to Bruce Einstein, the janitor.


Zombie has discovered a verbal ambiguity ("this
evidence" is somewhat misleading). Bravo zombie!


It is your quote, which you placed out here, without any sort of
thought whatsoever.

Now it is time for zombie to start thinking of the
implications of the VARIABILITY of the speed of light
Einstein introduced in Chapter 22 in his 1920 "Relativity".


Nothing of importance to an advertisement to yet another rag
publication, Pentcho.

David A. Smith

  #8  
Old November 3rd 07, 06:59 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

On 2 Nov, 19:41, dlzc wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:48 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:

On 2 Nov, wrote:
On Nov 1, 2:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
...


http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"The first confirmation of a long range variation
in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964.
...
Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the
second place our result shows that,


Pentcho, do you actually use that grey matter between
your shoulders?


This result was obtained in 1964. Albert Einstein
died in 1955. So either he arose from the grave, or
they are referring to Bruce Einstein, the janitor.


Zombie has discovered a verbal ambiguity ("this
evidence" is somewhat misleading). Bravo zombie!


It is your quote, which you placed out here, without any sort of
thought whatsoever.

Now it is time for zombie to start thinking of the
implications of the VARIABILITY of the speed of light
Einstein introduced in Chapter 22 in his 1920 "Relativity".


Nothing of importance to an advertisement to yet another rag
publication, Pentcho.

David A. Smith


Zombie hate variable speed of light. Zombie think trouble this must
be. Zombie love constant speed of light. Constant speed of light give
zombie money. Constant speed of light make zombie happy.

Pentcho Valev

  #9  
Old November 3rd 07, 05:48 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_68_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ps.com...
On 2 Nov, 19:41, dlzc wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:48 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:

On 2 Nov, wrote:
On Nov 1, 2:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
...


http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"The first confirmation of a long range variation
in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964.
...
Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the
second place our result shows that,


Pentcho, do you actually use that grey matter between
your shoulders?

....
Zombie hate variable speed of light. Zombie think
trouble this must be. Zombie love constant speed
of light. Constant speed of light give zombie money.
Constant speed of light make zombie happy.


I came to usenet for answer to *my* questions about VSL, care of
Setterfield's work.

I am neither a physicist nor an instructor, so I make no money
from relativity.

*Local* constant speed of light makes Maxwell happy, and Mother
Nature too, as it turns out.

I am not the one that brainlessly posted a quote that was
glaringly incorrect. Only a zombie would do that. And I am not
the one that keeps trying to hijack the thread.

David A. Smith


  #10  
Old November 3rd 07, 07:07 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Journal of Gravitational Physics

On 3 Nov, 18:48, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote:

On 2 Nov, 19:41, dlzc wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:48 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:


On 2 Nov, wrote:
On Nov 1, 2:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
...


http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"The first confirmation of a long range variation
in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964.
...
Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the
second place our result shows that,


Pentcho, do you actually use that grey matter between
your shoulders?

...
Zombie hate variable speed of light. Zombie think
trouble this must be. Zombie love constant speed
of light. Constant speed of light give zombie money.
Constant speed of light make zombie happy.


I came to usenet for answer to *my* questions about VSL, care of
Setterfield's work.

I am neither a physicist nor an instructor, so I make no money
from relativity.

*Local* constant speed of light makes Maxwell happy, and Mother
Nature too, as it turns out.


Maxwell predicts a VARIABLE speed of light (according to him, the
speed of light varies with the relative speed of the observer and the
aether) so even your masters should be silent about this, let alone
bellicose zombies. If you want to get used to the idea of the
VARIABILITY of the speed of light, you should first try to understand
the variability of the speed of light in a gravitational field - the
fact is explicitly stated by Divine Albert and confirmed by all
important hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._of_light.html
"Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of relativity
which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and he talked
about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In the 1920 book
"Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote: . . . according
to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the
velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two
fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity [. . .]
cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can
only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with
position. Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector quantity: speed
with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not clear that he meant
the speed will change, but the reference to special relativity
suggests that he did mean so."

http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is
absolutely true that the speed of light is _not_ constant in a
gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as
well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference].......Indeed,
this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence
of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35,
1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity
by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You
can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle
of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's
derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational
potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c2 ) where V is
the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of
light c0 is measured."

Tom Roberts wrote in sci.physics.relativity:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
CAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT EXCEED 300000 km/s IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD?

Sure, depending on the physical conditions of the measurement. It can
also be less than "300000 km/s" (by which I assume you really mean the
standard value for c). And this can happen even for an accelerated
observer in a region without any significant gravitation (e.g. in
Minkowski spacetime).
Tom Roberts


The last criminal, Tom Roberts, is by no means an "important
hypnotist" but he is the LAST active hypnotist - you may have noticed
that Steve Carlip, John Baez etc. have been silent about Divine
Albert's Divine Theory for a very long time.

Pentcho Valev

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DID AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS REFUTE EINSTEIN? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 28 October 31st 07 04:45 AM
alt.astronomy, alt.sci.physics, alt.sci.physics.new-theories, AJAY SHARMA Misc 0 November 5th 06 03:20 AM
Int. Journal of Modern Physics D - TOC alert YH Khoo Research 0 October 1st 03 11:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.