|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-...m-gravity.html "(PhysOrg.com) -- As a quantum theory of gravity, loop quantum gravity could potentially solve one of the biggest problems in physics: reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics. But like all tentative theories of quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity has never been experimentally tested. Now in a new study, scientists have found that, when black holes evaporate, the radiation they emit could potentially reveal “footprints” of loop quantum gravity, distinct from the usual Hawking radiation that black holes are expected to emit. " |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
On Jan 3, 8:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravityhttp://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-physicists-loop-quantum-gravity.html "(PhysOrg.com) -- As a quantum theory of gravity, loop quantum gravity could potentially solve one of the biggest problems in physics: reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics. But like all tentative theories of quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity has never been experimentally tested. Now in a new study, scientists have found that, when black holes evaporate, the radiation they emit could potentially reveal “footprints” of loop quantum gravity, distinct from the usual Hawking radiation that black holes are expected to emit. " --------------------------- and now i understand why you was interested in my P Circlon idea !!! (:-) !! that is from 1993 ! it is because some of you wanted to steal my idea in some disguised dress !! !!! andnow Khan i unserstand why while i was missing for some time you publisher a thread sort of : what happened to Porat ?? did he already disappeared ?? (and if yes it is agood time tosteal something from him (:-) BTW Khan you refused to tell me what is your day job .......! is it for any chance a publishing Company as PD s ?? every one can see my (P -Circlon) idea p Circlon is in case that just the'' Circlon'' name is already occupied ! 50 years ago by some Carter that was a nice trick to bypass me ??? (:-) so see the P Circlon at the **appendix** of my abstract of my book : http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract i brought it as a by product of my above historic model it is a direct result of it but that is not my p Circlon !! now THERE ARE SOME BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN YOU AND WHOEVER IS ADVANCING THAT CIRCULAR STORY OF SORT OF 'GRAVITONS ' 1 i never knew about any observations of circular movement in astronomy i newof course that galaxies rotate i knew that wind storms - rotate i knew that wate in your sink rotate different in your sink while it is in northen hemisphere of southern one !! etc but i dinty know about its involvement in gravity just extracted out of my understanding of my model with its'' chain of orbitals'' etc while you or whoever is it have not any deeper theoretic cross verifications to justify the question FROM WHERE THE HELL THAT IDEA FALL ON YOU SORT OF '''OUT OF THE BLUE '''?? 2 in my above appendix i explain the first time in history how such a strange idea can explain **any attraction force by force messengers that has the P Circlon behavior is starting to move from one massin 1 curved path and HITTING THE OTHER MASS FROM MORE THE RARE SIDE OF IT AND LESS FORM ITS FRONT SIDE AND BY THAT AN UN BALANCED FORCE IS CREATED ON MASS No 2 !!! (by moving back and forth between he two masses ) CREATING SORT OF A CLAMP !! THAT BECOMES BIGGER AND BIGGER AS DISTANCE BETWEEN THE TWO MASSES --BECOME SMALLER AND SMALLER (THE 1/ R^2 LAW !!! moreover my model showes how that p Circlon can do both 1 particles 2 attraction forces and unlike you or whoever you have nothing of it !! i actually predicted those observations by that p Circlon idea since 1993 and even lately suggested a few times the LHC people to look for a circular movement THAT CANT BE EXPLAINED BY ANY CURRENT THEORY !! i showed it and explained the above along many years and it is documented along many years since 1993 ! so just forget about stealing my P Circlon idea !! and moreover : just give the credit to the one who really deserve and own it !!! TIA Y.Porat -------------------------- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
On Jan 4, 8:19*am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
On Jan 3, 8:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravityhttp://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-physicists-loop-quantum-gravity.html "(PhysOrg.com) -- As a quantum theory of gravity, loop quantum gravity could potentially solve one of the biggest problems in physics: reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics. But like all tentative theories of quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity has never been experimentally tested. Now in a new study, scientists have found that, when black holes evaporate, the radiation they emit could potentially reveal “footprints” of loop quantum gravity, distinct from the usual Hawking radiation that black holes are expected to emit. " --------------------------- and now i understand why you was interested in my P Circlon idea !!! * *(:-) *!! that is from 1993 ! it is because some of you wanted to steal my idea in some disguised * dress *!! !!! andnow Khan i unserstand why while i was missing for some time you *publisher a thread sort of : what happened to Porat ?? did he already disappeared ?? (and if yes it is agood time tosteal something from him (:-) BTW * * Khan you refused to *tell me what is your day job * .......! is it for any chance a publishing Company as PD s ?? every one can see my (P -Circlon) idea p Circlon is in case that just *the'' Circlon'' *name is already occupied ! 50 years ago *by some Carter that was a nice trick to bypass me *??? *(:-) so *see the P Circlon at the **appendix** of my abstract of my book : http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract i brought it as a by product of my above *historic model it is a direct result of it but that is not my p Circlon *!! now THERE ARE SOME BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN YOU AND WHOEVER IS ADVANCING THAT CIRCULAR STORY OF SORT OF 'GRAVITONS ' 1 i never *knew about any observations of circular *movement *in astronomy i newof course that galaxies * rotate i knew *that wind storms - rotate i knew that wate in your sink rotate different in your sink while it is in northen * hemisphere of southern one !! etc but i dinty know about its involvement in gravity just extracted out of my understanding of my model with * its'' chain of orbitals'' etc while you *or whoever is it *have not any *deeper *theoretic cross verifications to justify the question FROM WHERE THE HELL THAT IDEA FALL ON YOU SORT OF '''OUT OF THE BLUE '''?? 2 in *my above * appendix i explain the *first time * in * *history how such a strange idea can explain **any attraction * force by force messengers that has the P Circlon * behavior is starting to move from one massin *1 curved path and * HITTING THE OTHER MASS FROM MORE THE RARE SIDE OF IT AND LESS FORM ITS *FRONT SIDE AND BY THAT AN UN *BALANCED FORCE IS CREATED ON * MASS * No * 2 !!! (by moving back *and forth *between he two masses ) CREATING SORT OF A CLAMP !! THAT BECOMES BIGGER AND *BIGGER AS * DISTANCE BETWEEN * THE TWO MASSES --BECOME * SMALLER * AND * SMALLER * (THE 1/ R^2 LAW !!! moreover my model showes how that p *Circlon *can do *both 1 particles 2 attraction forces and unlike you or whoever you have nothing of it !! i *actually *predicted those observations *by that p *Circlon idea since 1993 and even *lately *suggested a *few times the LHC people to look for a circular movement THAT CANT BE EXPLAINED BY ANY *CURRENT *THEORY !! *i showed it and explained the above *along many *years and it is documented along *many *years since 1993 ! so just forget about stealing my * P Circlon idea !! and *moreover : just *give the credit to *the one who *really deserve and own *it !!! TIA Y.Porat -------------------------- xxein: Own it if you can or want to, but it it all bogus crap. How come meteoroids/asteroids/comets are not spherical? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
On Jan 4, 8:21*pm, xxein wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:19*am, "Y.Porat" wrote: On Jan 3, 8:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravityhttp://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-physicists-loop-quantum-gravity.html "(PhysOrg.com) -- As a quantum theory of gravity, loop quantum gravity could potentially solve one of the biggest problems in physics: reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics. But like all tentative theories of quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity has never been experimentally tested. Now in a new study, scientists have found that, when black holes evaporate, the radiation they emit could potentially reveal “footprints” of loop quantum gravity, distinct from the usual Hawking radiation that black holes are expected to emit. " --------------------------- and now i understand why you was interested in my P Circlon idea !!! * *(:-) *!! that is from 1993 ! it is because some of you wanted to steal my idea in some disguised * dress *!! !!! andnow Khan i unserstand why while i was missing for some time you *publisher a thread sort of : what happened to Porat ?? did he already disappeared ?? (and if yes it is agood time tosteal something from him (:-) BTW * * Khan you refused to *tell me what is your day job * .......! is it for any chance a publishing Company as PD s ?? every one can see my (P -Circlon) idea p Circlon is in case that just *the'' Circlon'' *name is already occupied ! 50 years ago *by some Carter that was a nice trick to bypass me *??? *(:-) so *see the P Circlon at the **appendix** of my abstract of my book : http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract i brought it as a by product of my above *historic model it is a direct result of it but that is not my p Circlon *!! now THERE ARE SOME BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN YOU AND WHOEVER IS ADVANCING THAT CIRCULAR STORY OF SORT OF 'GRAVITONS ' 1 i never *knew about any observations of circular *movement *in astronomy i newof course that galaxies * rotate i knew *that wind storms - rotate i knew that wate in your sink rotate different in your sink while it is in northen * hemisphere of southern one !! etc but i dinty know about its involvement in gravity just extracted out of my understanding of my model with * its'' chain of orbitals'' etc while you *or whoever is it *have not any *deeper *theoretic cross verifications to justify the question FROM WHERE THE HELL THAT IDEA FALL ON YOU SORT OF '''OUT OF THE BLUE '''?? 2 in *my above * appendix i explain the *first time * in * *history how such a strange idea can explain **any attraction * force by force messengers that has the P Circlon * behavior is starting to move from one massin *1 curved path and * HITTING THE OTHER MASS FROM MORE THE RARE SIDE OF IT AND LESS FORM ITS *FRONT SIDE AND BY THAT AN UN *BALANCED FORCE IS CREATED ON * MASS * No * 2 !!! (by moving back *and forth *between he two masses ) CREATING SORT OF A CLAMP !! THAT BECOMES BIGGER AND *BIGGER AS * DISTANCE BETWEEN * THE TWO MASSES --BECOME * SMALLER * AND * SMALLER * (THE 1/ R^2 LAW !!! moreover my model showes how that p *Circlon *can do *both 1 particles 2 attraction forces and unlike you or whoever you have nothing of it !! i *actually *predicted those observations *by that p *Circlon idea since 1993 and even *lately *suggested a *few times the LHC people to look for a circular movement THAT CANT BE EXPLAINED BY ANY *CURRENT *THEORY !! *i showed it and explained the above *along many *years and it is documented along *many *years since 1993 ! so just forget about stealing my * P Circlon idea !! and *moreover : just *give the credit to *the one who *really deserve and own *it !!! TIA Y.Porat -------------------------- xxein: *Own it if you can or want to, but it it all bogus crap. How come meteoroids/asteroids/comets are not spherical?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How can we use a black hole? They would be the end of space and time. How can that move around? No. Black holes are out. There are no spatial boundaries; universal or local like an event horizon. Hawking the mathematician could have made BH failure in math stick but did not. Science admits to the original cover up of disproof. Mitchell Raemsch; the prize |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
On Jan 5, 12:56*am, "
wrote: On Jan 4, 8:21*pm, xxein wrote: On Jan 4, 8:19*am, "Y.Porat" wrote: On Jan 3, 8:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravityhttp://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-physicists-loop-quantum-gravity.html "(PhysOrg.com) -- As a quantum theory of gravity, loop quantum gravity could potentially solve one of the biggest problems in physics: reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics. But like all tentative theories of quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity has never been experimentally tested. Now in a new study, scientists have found that, when black holes evaporate, the radiation they emit could potentially reveal “footprints” of loop quantum gravity, distinct from the usual Hawking radiation that black holes are expected to emit. " --------------------------- and now i understand why you was interested in my P Circlon idea !!! * *(:-) *!! that is from 1993 ! it is because some of you wanted to steal my idea in some disguised * dress *!! !!! andnow Khan i unserstand why while i was missing for some time you *publisher a thread sort of : what happened to Porat ?? did he already disappeared ?? (and if yes it is agood time tosteal something from him (:-) BTW * * Khan you refused to *tell me what is your day job * .......! is it for any chance a publishing Company as PD s ?? every one can see my (P -Circlon) idea p Circlon is in case that just *the'' Circlon'' *name is already occupied ! 50 years ago *by some Carter that was a nice trick to bypass me *??? *(:-) so *see the P Circlon at the **appendix** of my abstract of my book : http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract i brought it as a by product of my above *historic model it is a direct result of it but that is not my p Circlon *!! now THERE ARE SOME BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN YOU AND WHOEVER IS ADVANCING THAT CIRCULAR STORY OF SORT OF 'GRAVITONS ' 1 i never *knew about any observations of circular *movement *in astronomy i newof course that galaxies * rotate i knew *that wind storms - rotate i knew that wate in your sink rotate different in your sink while it is in northen * hemisphere of southern one !! etc but i dinty know about its involvement in gravity just extracted out of my understanding of my model with * its'' chain of orbitals'' etc while you *or whoever is it *have not any *deeper *theoretic cross verifications to justify the question FROM WHERE THE HELL THAT IDEA FALL ON YOU SORT OF '''OUT OF THE BLUE '''?? 2 in *my above * appendix i explain the *first time * in * *history how such a strange idea can explain **any attraction * force by force messengers that has the P Circlon * behavior is starting to move from one massin *1 curved path and * HITTING THE OTHER MASS FROM MORE THE RARE SIDE OF IT AND LESS FORM ITS *FRONT SIDE AND BY THAT AN UN *BALANCED FORCE IS CREATED ON * MASS * No * 2 !!! (by moving back *and forth *between he two masses ) CREATING SORT OF A CLAMP !! THAT BECOMES BIGGER AND *BIGGER AS * DISTANCE BETWEEN * THE TWO MASSES --BECOME * SMALLER * AND * SMALLER * (THE 1/ R^2 LAW !!! moreover my model showes how that p *Circlon *can do *both 1 particles 2 attraction forces and unlike you or whoever you have nothing of it !! i *actually *predicted those observations *by that p *Circlon idea since 1993 and even *lately *suggested a *few times the LHC people to look for a circular movement THAT CANT BE EXPLAINED BY ANY *CURRENT *THEORY !! *i showed it and explained the above *along many *years and it is documented along *many *years since 1993 ! so just forget about stealing my * P Circlon idea !! and *moreover : just *give the credit to *the one who *really deserve and own *it !!! TIA Y.Porat -------------------------- xxein: *Own it if you can or want to, but it it all bogus crap. How come meteoroids/asteroids/comets are not spherical?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How can we use a black hole? They would be the end of space and time. How can that move around? No. Black holes are out. There are no spatial boundaries; universal or local like an event horizon. Hawking the mathematician could have made BH failure in math stick but did not. Science admits to the original cover up of disproof. Mitchell Raemsch; the prize Papper by Shreck,and Shwartz on the strength of gravity in the quantum realm was well received. It has gravity's strength as the strongest force. Good read TreBert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
On Jan 4, 8:21*pm, xxein wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:19*am, "Y.Porat" wrote: On Jan 3, 8:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravityhttp://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-physicists-loop-quantum-gravity.html "(PhysOrg.com) -- As a quantum theory of gravity, loop quantum gravity could potentially solve one of the biggest problems in physics: reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics. But like all tentative theories of quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity has never been experimentally tested. Now in a new study, scientists have found that, when black holes evaporate, the radiation they emit could potentially reveal “footprints” of loop quantum gravity, distinct from the usual Hawking radiation that black holes are expected to emit. " --------------------------- and now i understand why you was interested in my P Circlon idea !!! * *(:-) *!! that is from 1993 ! it is because some of you wanted to steal my idea in some disguised * dress *!! !!! andnow Khan i unserstand why while i was missing for some time you *publisher a thread sort of : what happened to Porat ?? did he already disappeared ?? (and if yes it is agood time tosteal something from him (:-) BTW * * Khan you refused to *tell me what is your day job * .......! is it for any chance a publishing Company as PD s ?? every one can see my (P -Circlon) idea p Circlon is in case that just *the'' Circlon'' *name is already occupied ! 50 years ago *by some Carter that was a nice trick to bypass me *??? *(:-) so *see the P Circlon at the **appendix** of my abstract of my book : http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract i brought it as a by product of my above *historic model it is a direct result of it but that is not my p Circlon *!! now THERE ARE SOME BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN YOU AND WHOEVER IS ADVANCING THAT CIRCULAR STORY OF SORT OF 'GRAVITONS ' 1 i never *knew about any observations of circular *movement *in astronomy i newof course that galaxies * rotate i knew *that wind storms - rotate i knew that wate in your sink rotate different in your sink while it is in northen * hemisphere of southern one !! etc but i dinty know about its involvement in gravity just extracted out of my understanding of my model with * its'' chain of orbitals'' etc while you *or whoever is it *have not any *deeper *theoretic cross verifications to justify the question FROM WHERE THE HELL THAT IDEA FALL ON YOU SORT OF '''OUT OF THE BLUE '''?? 2 in *my above * appendix i explain the *first time * in * *history how such a strange idea can explain **any attraction * force by force messengers that has the P Circlon * behavior is starting to move from one massin *1 curved path and * HITTING THE OTHER MASS FROM MORE THE RARE SIDE OF IT AND LESS FORM ITS *FRONT SIDE AND BY THAT AN UN *BALANCED FORCE IS CREATED ON * MASS * No * 2 !!! (by moving back *and forth *between he two masses ) CREATING SORT OF A CLAMP !! THAT BECOMES BIGGER AND *BIGGER AS * DISTANCE BETWEEN * THE TWO MASSES --BECOME * SMALLER * AND * SMALLER * (THE 1/ R^2 LAW !!! moreover my model showes how that p *Circlon *can do *both 1 particles 2 attraction forces and unlike you or whoever you have nothing of it !! i *actually *predicted those observations *by that p *Circlon idea since 1993 and even *lately *suggested a *few times the LHC people to look for a circular movement THAT CANT BE EXPLAINED BY ANY *CURRENT *THEORY !! *i showed it and explained the above *along many *years and it is documented along *many *years since 1993 ! so just forget about stealing my * P Circlon idea !! and *moreover : just *give the credit to *the one who *really deserve and own *it !!! TIA Y.Porat -------------------------- xxein: *Own it if you can or want to, but it it all bogus crap. How come meteoroids/asteroids/comets are not spherical? ----------------- imbecile retard sub intelligent monkey who was talking about meteoroids comets ?? didnt you understand retard that i m talking about some super basic particles that compose the say electrons or even smaller - ''gravitons ' etc do you expect to see it with your retarded eyes ?? so why are you jumping like a baboon into fine crystal shop leave it to intelligent serious responsible - human beings BTW gangster 2 what is your real name piggy ??? 3 who is sponsoring you ? tell them you are worth nothing even as gangster !! and tell them that you are the real crap here !! NEXT !!! ----------------- Y.Porat -------------------- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
Mitchell Raemsch; the self prized wrote: snip crap How can we use a black hole? No. Black holes are out. Mitchell Raemsch; the prize hanson wrote: ahahahaha... Mitch, old chum, Happy 2012 to you. Now, Mitch, put your Bible down and listen up: If you are gonna use a black hole, check whether it has hair or not, before you turn racist and declare that Black holes are out... Keep your eye on the price .. & thanks for the laughs.... ahahaha... hahahahanson |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
On Jan 5, 2:20*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Jan 5, 12:56*am, " wrote: On Jan 4, 8:21*pm, xxein wrote: On Jan 4, 8:19*am, "Y.Porat" wrote: On Jan 3, 8:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravityhttp://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-physicists-loop-quantum-gravity.html "(PhysOrg.com) -- As a quantum theory of gravity, loop quantum gravity could potentially solve one of the biggest problems in physics: reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics. But like all tentative theories of quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity has never been experimentally tested. Now in a new study, scientists have found that, when black holes evaporate, the radiation they emit could potentially reveal “footprints” of loop quantum gravity, distinct from the usual Hawking radiation that black holes are expected to emit.. " --------------------------- and now i understand why you was interested in my P Circlon idea !!! * *(:-) *!! that is from 1993 ! it is because some of you wanted to steal my idea in some disguised * dress *!! !!! andnow Khan i unserstand why while i was missing for some time you *publisher a thread sort of : what happened to Porat ?? did he already disappeared ?? (and if yes it is agood time tosteal something from him (:-) BTW * * Khan you refused to *tell me what is your day job * .......! is it for any chance a publishing Company as PD s ?? every one can see my (P -Circlon) idea p Circlon is in case that just *the'' Circlon'' *name is already occupied ! 50 years ago *by some Carter that was a nice trick to bypass me *??? *(:-) so *see the P Circlon at the **appendix** of my abstract of my book : http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract i brought it as a by product of my above *historic model it is a direct result of it but that is not my p Circlon *!! now THERE ARE SOME BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN YOU AND WHOEVER IS ADVANCING THAT CIRCULAR STORY OF SORT OF 'GRAVITONS ' 1 i never *knew about any observations of circular *movement *in astronomy i newof course that galaxies * rotate i knew *that wind storms - rotate i knew that wate in your sink rotate different in your sink while it is in northen * hemisphere of southern one !! etc but i dinty know about its involvement in gravity just extracted out of my understanding of my model with * its'' chain of orbitals'' etc while you *or whoever is it *have not any *deeper *theoretic cross verifications to justify the question FROM WHERE THE HELL THAT IDEA FALL ON YOU SORT OF '''OUT OF THE BLUE '''?? 2 in *my above * appendix i explain the *first time * in * *history how such a strange idea can explain **any attraction * force by force messengers that has the P Circlon * behavior is starting to move from one massin *1 curved path and * HITTING THE OTHER MASS FROM MORE THE RARE SIDE OF IT AND LESS FORM ITS *FRONT SIDE AND BY THAT AN UN *BALANCED FORCE IS CREATED ON * MASS * No * 2 !!! (by moving back *and forth *between he two masses ) CREATING SORT OF A CLAMP !! THAT BECOMES BIGGER AND *BIGGER AS * DISTANCE BETWEEN * THE TWO MASSES --BECOME * SMALLER * AND * SMALLER * (THE 1/ R^2 LAW !!! moreover my model showes how that p *Circlon *can do *both 1 particles 2 attraction forces and unlike you or whoever you have nothing of it !! i *actually *predicted those observations *by that p *Circlon idea since 1993 and even *lately *suggested a *few times the LHC people to look for a circular movement THAT CANT BE EXPLAINED BY ANY *CURRENT *THEORY !! *i showed it and explained the above *along many *years and it is documented along *many *years since 1993 ! so just forget about stealing my * P Circlon idea !! and *moreover : just *give the credit to *the one who *really deserve and own *it !!! TIA Y.Porat -------------------------- xxein: *Own it if you can or want to, but it it all bogus crap. How come meteoroids/asteroids/comets are not spherical?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How can we use a black hole? They would be the end of space and time. How can that move around? No. Black holes are out. There are no spatial boundaries; universal or local like an event horizon. Hawking the mathematician could have made BH failure in math stick but did not. Science admits to the original cover up of disproof. Mitchell Raemsch; the prize Papper by Shreck,and Shwartz on the strength of gravity in the quantum realm was well received. It has gravity's strength as the strongest force. *Good read *TreBert- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I believe all forces have a limit. This starts theoretically with gravity. Einstein's curve is combined with limited gravity. Mitchell Raemsch |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes
On Jan 3, 10:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravityhttp://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-physicists-loop-quantum-gravity.html "(PhysOrg.com) -- As a quantum theory of gravity, loop quantum gravity could potentially solve one of the biggest problems in physics: reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics. But like all tentative theories of quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity has never been experimentally tested. Now in a new study, scientists have found that, when black holes evaporate, the radiation they emit could potentially reveal “footprints” of loop quantum gravity, distinct from the usual Hawking radiation that black holes are expected to emit. " "When black holes evaporate..."= never. john |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Black Star Is Born: a quantum based alternative to blackholes! | jughead | Misc | 1 | October 12th 09 06:50 AM |
Loop Gravity and the Bouncing Universe | Double-A[_2_] | Misc | 129 | November 1st 08 07:07 PM |
News: Physicists Seek Answers to Quantum Correlations | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 17th 08 03:52 AM |
Quantum Gravity 240.5: Quantum Gravity "Demolished" At Universityof Oregon USA | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 1st 08 03:12 PM |
Scientists propose test of string theory based on neutral hydrogenabsorption (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 29th 08 10:00 PM |