|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one can be calculated by the formulas rm=Y*vm*opy vm=rm/Y/opy opy=rm/vm/Y These elements of the 9 major planets are given below as an example: Y vm opy rm=Y*vm*opy MER 5,022,635 47872 0.2408416 57,909,231,029 VEN 5,022,635 35021 0.6151856 108,209,525,401 EAR 5,022,635 29785 0.9999988 149,598,319,494 MAR 5,022,635 24131 1.8807278 227,943,771,564 JUP 5,022,635 13056 11.8693454 778,342,761,465 SAT 5,022,635 9644 29.4548244 1,426,714,892,866 URA 5,022,635 6799 84.0627938 2,870,633,540,862 NEP 5,022,635 5432 164.8713207 4,498,393,012,162 PLU 5,022,635 4738 248.2214844 5,906,438,090,764 rm Y opy vm=rm/Y/opy MER 57,909,231,029 5,022,635 0.2408416 47872 VEN 108,209,525,401 5,022,635 0.6151856 35021 EAR 149,598,319,494 5,022,635 0.9999988 29785 MAR 227,943,771,564 5,022,635 1.8807278 24131 JUP 778,342,761,465 5,022,635 11.8693454 13056 SAT 1,426,714,892,866 5,022,635 29.4548244 9644 URA 2,870,633,540,862 5,022,635 84.0627938 6799 NEP 4,498,393,012,162 5,022,635 164.8713207 5432 PLU 5,906,438,090,764 5,022,635 248.2214844 4738 rm vm Y opy=rm/vm/Y MER 57,909,231,029 47872 5,022,635 0.2408416322 VEN 108,209,525,401 35021 5,022,635 0.6151856070 EAR 149,598,319,494 29785 5,022,635 0.9999988008 MAR 227,943,771,564 24131 5,022,635 1.8807277596 JUP 778,342,761,465 13056 5,022,635 11.8693454242 SAT 1,426,714,892,866 9644 5,022,635 29.4548244442 URA 2,870,633,540,862 6799 5,022,635 84.0627938052 NEP 4,498,393,012,162 5432 5,022,635 164.8713206889 PLU 5,906,438,090,764 4738 5,022,635 248.2214843718 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635 If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one can be calculated by the formulas rm=Y*vm*opy vm=rm/Y/opy opy=rm/vm/Y You rediscover the America. Y vm opy rm=Y*vm*opy [...] PLU 5,022,635 4738 248.2214844 5,906,438,090,764 "Nothing is better manifestation of ignorance in science then an untamed precision of scientific calculations" ( A recalled title quote of unknown author in a textbook of physical chemistry) -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 2:54:17 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a): The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635 If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one can be calculated by the formulas rm=Y*vm*opy vm=rm/Y/opy opy=rm/vm/Y You rediscover the America. Y vm opy rm=Y*vm*opy [...] PLU 5,022,635 4738 248.2214844 5,906,438,090,764 "Nothing is better manifestation of ignorance in science then an untamed precision of scientific calculations" ( A recalled title quote of unknown author in a textbook of physical chemistry) -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. I am not concerned about precision it is irrelevant in this context. What is relevant is the ability to calcuate missing orbital elements of any solar object with my constant. You and Bod keep harping about precision because you have nothing else to criticise. I'll try to keep throwing this bone to you to keep you happy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
Dne 17/01/2018 v 08:45 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 2:54:17 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote: Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a): The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635 If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one can be calculated by the formulas rm=Y*vm*opy vm=rm/Y/opy opy=rm/vm/Y You rediscover the America. Y vm opy rm=Y*vm*opy [...] PLU 5,022,635 4738 248.2214844 5,906,438,090,764 "Nothing is better manifestation of ignorance in science then an untamed precision of scientific calculations" ( A recalled title quote of unknown author in a textbook of physical chemistry) I am not concerned about precision it is irrelevant in this context. What is relevant is the ability to calcuate missing orbital elements of any solar object with my constant. You and Bod keep harping about precision because you have nothing else to criticise. I'll try to keep throwing this bone to you to keep you happy. Your just rediscover the consequences of the laws known for centuries. The result precision limited to the valid digits it the first law of numerical processing of real data. Well, near everything you write is very easy to criticize. It becomes boring. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
Dne 17/01/2018 v 08:45 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
I am not concerned about precision it is irrelevant in this context. What is relevant is the ability to calcuate missing orbital elements of any solar object with my constant. You and Bod keep harping about precision because you have nothing else to criticise. I'll try to keep throwing this bone to you to keep you happy. Your constant is nothing more then a constant dependent on G and Ms, expressed for units used for distances, speeds and periods. This America was discovered centuries ago. You bring nothing new. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 4:01:28 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 17/01/2018 v 08:45 Peter Riedt napsal(a): I am not concerned about precision it is irrelevant in this context. What is relevant is the ability to calcuate missing orbital elements of any solar object with my constant. You and Bod keep harping about precision because you have nothing else to criticise. I'll try to keep throwing this bone to you to keep you happy. Your constant is nothing more then a constant dependent on G and Ms, expressed for units used for distances, speeds and periods. This America was discovered centuries ago. You bring nothing new. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. Y can calculate missing elements of planetary orbits. The solar system is full of these constants. Do you like to know more of them? I guess not. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
Dne 17/01/2018 v 23:50 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 4:01:28 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote: Your constant is nothing more then a constant dependent on G and Ms, expressed for units used for distances, speeds and periods. This America was discovered centuries ago. You bring nothing new. Y can calculate missing elements of planetary orbits. The solar system is full of these constants. Do you like to know more of them? I guess not. Numbers do not know math, they cannot calculate anything. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635 If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one can be calculated by the formulas rm=Y*vm*opy [...] [km] = [s/year /(2pi)] * [km/s] * [year] Your constant is an ordinary proportional constant of relation of a circle radius in km, the mean speed in km/s and the period in years. If linearized, it is an indeed "powerful" formula length = mean_speed * time For an ellipse, it is not exact. As it incorrectly supposes that for the given period and semi major axis "a" the orbit has the same mean speed as a circular orbit would have, what is not true. The various elliptical orbits with the same semi major axis have the same period. But their mean speed nor the perigee speed nor the apogee speed are NOT the same. As the ellipse circumference is less than 2.pi.a. But even this is not new for you, as this was discussed with you before ad nausea several times. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 2:33:29 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a): The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635 If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one can be calculated by the formulas rm=Y*vm*opy [...] [km] = [s/year /(2pi)] * [km/s] * [year] Your constant is an ordinary proportional constant of relation of a circle radius in km, the mean speed in km/s and the period in years. If linearized, it is an indeed "powerful" formula length = mean_speed * time For an ellipse, it is not exact. As it incorrectly supposes that for the given period and semi major axis "a" the orbit has the same mean speed as a circular orbit would have, what is not true. The various elliptical orbits with the same semi major axis have the same period. But their mean speed nor the perigee speed nor the apogee speed are NOT the same. As the ellipse circumference is less than 2.pi.a. But even this is not new for you, as this was discussed with you before ad nausea several times. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. Your comments are valid but irrelevant. What is relevant is Y allows to predict accurately missing elements of orbits of solar objects. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635
Dne 18/01/2018 v 11:55 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 2:33:29 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote: [km] = [s/year /(2pi)] * [km/s] * [year] Your constant is an ordinary proportional constant of relation of a circle radius in km, the mean speed in km/s and the period in years. If linearized, it is an indeed "powerful" formula length = mean_speed * time For an ellipse, it is not exact. As it incorrectly supposes that for the given period and semi major axis "a" the orbit has the same mean speed as a circular orbit would have, what is not true. The various elliptical orbits with the same semi major axis have the same period. But their mean speed nor the perigee speed nor the apogee speed are NOT the same. As the ellipse circumference is less than 2.pi.a. But even this is not new for you, as this was discussed with you before ad nausea several times. Your comments are valid but irrelevant. What is relevant is Y allows to predict accurately missing elements of orbits of solar objects. No, it does not. It fits only if you deliberately choose a particular speed value. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635 | Peter Riedt | Astronomy Misc | 14 | January 20th 18 10:36 AM |
The Fine Structure Constant is Probably Constant | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 19th 10 12:02 AM |
Fog control big brother power power power power! | gb6726 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 19th 07 06:25 PM |
Is Einstein's "Cosmological Constant" Really a Constant? (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 13th 06 06:41 AM |
New Quasar Studies Keep Fundamental Physical Constant Constant (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 28th 04 07:46 PM |