What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

"Herbert Glazier" wrote:
Bert's Hemorrhoids (BHs) getting more dense without
getting bigger fits in my mind's eye Go figure Bert


hmmm...snicker...chortle...ahahahAHAHA...ROTFL MAO

On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 1:58:12 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:01:37 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More
dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion
disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on
look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes.
They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that
point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space.

Double-A

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the
event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

--
Daniel


So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center!

Double-A

BHs getting more dense without getting bigger fits in my mind's eye Go figure Bert

Hard to messure a BH Think about whyBert

Swine Glazier is on his daily Run
Waits for Bert's Double-Asshole to come
------- See: Glazier's Dossier -------
e.g http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017




hmmm...snicker...chortle...ahahahAHAHA...ROTFL MAO

On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 1:57:48 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 1:58:12 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:01:37 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More
dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion
disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on
look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes.
They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that
point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space.

Double-A

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the
event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

--
Daniel


So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center!

Double-A

BHs getting more dense without getting bigger fits in my mind's eye Go figure Bert

Hard to messure a BH Think about whyBert


Well, yeah. You can't just go up to it and pull a tape measure around it!

Double-A

On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:54:37 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 1:57:48 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 1:58:12 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:01:37 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More
dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion
disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on
look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes.
They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that
point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space.

Double-A

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the
event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

--
Daniel


So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center!

Double-A

BHs getting more dense without getting bigger fits in my mind's eye Go figure Bert

Hard to messure a BH Think about whyBert


Well, yeah. You can't just go up to it and pull a tape measure around it!

Double-A

Not even a ruler would do.Tricky stuff gravity when it can make a hole in the fabric of space.Bert

On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 4:00:33 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:54:37 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 1:57:48 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 1:58:12 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:01:37 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More
dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion
disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on
look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes.
They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that
point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space.

Double-A

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the
event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

--
Daniel


So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center!

Double-A

BHs getting more dense without getting bigger fits in my mind's eye Go figure Bert

Hard to messure a BH Think about whyBert


Well, yeah. You can't just go up to it and pull a tape measure around it!

Double-A

Not even a ruler would do.Tricky stuff gravity when it can make a hole in the fabric of space.Bert


Put a ruler near it, and you would indeed see what a rubber ruler looks like!

Double-A

Bert's Double-Asshole did finally show
TurdBert now has a happy glow. (LOL)
------- See: Glazier's Dossier -------
e.g http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017


hmmm...snicker...chortle...ahahahAHAHA...ROTFL MAO

Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

--
Daniel

On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

--
Daniel


The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Double-A

Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Double-A

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

--
Daniel