|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq!
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message
... Pat Flannery wrote in news:12ii3v61a1007a1 @corp.supernews.com: William Elliot wrote: US baiting Korea, just like US baited Japan putting our stand downed battle fleet within tempting distance at Pearl Harbor. US leave, N.Korea invades S.Korea and US nukes the hell out of NK from off shore in full fulfillment of US promise to protect SK. China protests U.S. action by stopping exports to U.S. and terminates buying of U.S. government bonds to finance U.S. national debt; U.S. economy collapses, dollar is worthless, world switches to Euro as new currency of choice. Not a good scenario. China depends much more on exports to the US than the US depends on imports from China. China will suffer much more than the US under that scenario. That's not to say that China wouldn't do it. But it would be a mutual suicide pact, not unilateral retaliation, and the Chinese government understands that quite well. Is there a case where a Korean conflict is economically beneficial to the U.S.? I would imagine the U.S. military has war-gamed many scenarios where NK has attacked SK. The North Koreans probably have done the same. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq!
"Doubledown" wrote in
ink.net: Is there a case where a Korean conflict is economically beneficial to the U.S.? I would imagine the U.S. military has war-gamed many scenarios where NK has attacked SK. The North Koreans probably have done the same. I would imagine the only such scenarios would be the ones where NK aggression is so blatant that China chooses to sit out the war rather than retaliating against the US, either economically or militarily. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq!
In article m,
William Elliot wrote: ...just like US baited Japan putting our stand downed battle fleet within tempting distance at Pearl Harbor. Uh, where else would it have been put? Pearl Harbor was its *base*. And it wasn't "stood down", indeed it was on alert -- albeit a fairly low level of alert -- as a result of having been warned by Washington about ten days earlier that war was considered imminent. Despite it being a Sunday morning in home port, essentially all the fleet's antiaircraft guns were manned and firing within about 7 minutes of the start of the attack. (The *Army* AA guns, which nominally had the main responsibility for harbor defence, were another story...) A careful analysis, unblinkered by conspiracy theories, puts the blame for the mess firmly on the local commanders, who failed to coordinate a proper local defence and largely disregarded repeated warnings from Washington. US leave, N.Korea invades S.Korea and US nukes the hell out of NK from off shore in full fulfillment of US promise to protect SK. Uh, precisely how does this protect SK? The invading army is still there, indeed it now has all kinds of incentive to succeed, since its retreat is cut off. Moreover, nuking NK will kill a lot of civilians but will do much less damage to the NK military, which in the last half-century has gone in *very* heavily for putting crucial facilities underground. To say nothing of side effects from fallout -- in SK, Japan, and China -- and the political backlash (e.g., loss of all US basing rights in Japan -- nuclear weapons are anathema there). Really, really dumb idea. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary onIraq!
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Pat Flannery wrote:
William Elliot wrote: US baiting Korea, just like US baited Japan putting our stand downed battle fleet within tempting distance at Pearl Harbor. US leave, N.Korea invades S.Korea and US nukes the hell out of NK from off shore in full fulfillment of US promise to protect SK. China protests U.S. action by stopping exports to U.S. and terminates buying of U.S. government bonds to finance U.S. national debt; U.S. economy collapses, dollar is worthless, world switches to Euro as new currency of choice. Not a good scenario. On the contrary, most excelled, no US, everybody's happy. Immigrate to Canada, Mexico, Venezulea, Cuba, France, now before it's too late. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq!
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:21:32 -0400, jonathan wrote:
With Coalition Occupation Authority, insurgents, suicide bombers, the whole works. And we're the fraken cylons. Strange... I thought we were the Borg. It's over, time to begin planning our withdrawal from Iraq. US out of Hollywood. -- http://hertzlinger.blogspot.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq!
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 09:49:09 -0500, Pat Flannery
wrote: William Elliot wrote: US baiting Korea, just like US baited Japan putting our stand downed battle fleet within tempting distance at Pearl Harbor. US leave, N.Korea invades S.Korea and US nukes the hell out of NK from off shore in full fulfillment of US promise to protect SK. China protests U.S. action by stopping exports to U.S. and terminates buying of U.S. government bonds to finance U.S. national debt; U.S. economy collapses, dollar is worthless, .... and we undersell everybody. -- http://hertzlinger.blogspot.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary onIraq!
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
Pat Flannery wrote: William Elliot wrote: US baiting Korea, just like US baited Japan putting our stand downed battle fleet within tempting distance at Pearl Harbor. US leave, N.Korea invades S.Korea and US nukes the hell out of NK from off shore in full fulfillment of US promise to protect SK. China protests U.S. action by stopping exports to U.S. and terminates buying of U.S. government bonds to finance U.S. national debt; U.S. economy collapses, dollar is worthless, ... and we undersell everybody. But all US will have left to sell to foreigners is thousands of soon to be foreclosed houses, some less attractive not yet sold US companies, the service industry including the military and of course, US citizens. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq!
jonathan wrote: With Coalition Occupation Authority, insurgents, suicide bombers, the whole works. And we're the fraken cylons. It's over, time to begin planning our withdrawal from Iraq. Yes, obviously if a science fiction series disapproves of our war effort, we're doomed. - Jordan |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq!
Pat Flannery wrote: William Elliot wrote: US baiting Korea, just like US baited Japan putting our stand downed battle fleet within tempting distance at Pearl Harbor. US leave, N.Korea invades S.Korea and US nukes the hell out of NK from off shore in full fulfillment of US promise to protect SK. China protests U.S. action by stopping exports to U.S. and terminates buying of U.S. government bonds to finance U.S. national debt; U.S. economy collapses, dollar is worthless, world switches to Euro as new currency of choice. Not a good scenario. Especially not for China, which has just choked off the majority of _her own_ trade. Rather a self-sacrificing thing for the Chinese to do to merely "protest" an American action. Furthermore, I don't think that China's boycotting US government bonds would be enough to collapse the whole American economy, though I do see why it would be _bad_ for our economy. - Jordan |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq!
Henry Spencer wrote: In article m, William Elliot wrote: ...just like US baited Japan putting our stand downed battle fleet within tempting distance at Pearl Harbor. Uh, where else would it have been put? Pearl Harbor was its *base*. And it wasn't "stood down", indeed it was on alert -- albeit a fairly low level of alert -- as a result of having been warned by Washington about ten days earlier that war was considered imminent. Despite it being a Sunday morning in home port, essentially all the fleet's antiaircraft guns were manned and firing within about 7 minutes of the start of the attack. (The *Army* AA guns, which nominally had the main responsibility for harbor defence, were another story...) A careful analysis, unblinkered by conspiracy theories, puts the blame for the mess firmly on the local commanders, who failed to coordinate a proper local defence and largely disregarded repeated warnings from Washington. Is it true, as portrayed in one of the older films, that the British had supplied a radar installation, but the operators thought that the dots they were seeing were a mistake, and didn't pass on the warning. Makes you wonder what would have happenned all the US planes had gotten airborne. Especially if they all flew like Ben Affleck. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oh my God....new Battlestar Gallactica Season a commentary on Iraq! | jonathan | Policy | 122 | October 19th 06 01:14 AM |
Fraud in Gagarin's Flight Record Claims -- FAI Doesn't Care | Jim Oberg | Policy | 172 | April 28th 06 02:11 AM |
Runaway Global Warming Possible! | Thomas Lee Elifritz | Policy | 922 | May 2nd 05 03:52 PM |
Are Saddam's Sons Alive? | Madam Vinyl | Space Shuttle | 17 | August 5th 03 09:25 AM |