A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Buzz on Huffington Post



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 16th 09, 06:48 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default Buzz on Huffington Post

On Oct 14, 9:17*pm, OM wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:06:32 -0500, "Jorge R. Frank"

wrote:
I wouldn't say it removes any national self-determination. It just makes
pulling out of a program bothersome enough to make it less probable that
large and expensive programs started by one adminstration are cancelled
by the next one.


That can be (and often is) a bug, not a feature.


...And some also claim that it's a feature if it keeps a program in
place that's doing good and doesn't need to be sacrificed so the
incoming administration can make themselves look "good" by cancelling
it. Some could argue that had NASA not been in that exact position,
Nixon could have canned it so as to put another nail in JFK's
coffin(*) and/or LBJ could have further gutted it to fund his "Great
Society". God/Yahweh/Roddenberry knows that peanut farming inbred and
his retarded VEEP wanted to do just that during their one term of
misadministration, and damn near came close to achieving it.

(*) One can't help but wonder if Rumrunner Joe Kennedy's stroke had
been earlier *and* fatal, would American politics have turned out
better if Nixon had been given that cabinet position under JFK?


Why would JFK offer Nixon a cabinet posistion?
Why would Nixon accept a cabinet position from the guy that just beat
him during the presidential race?

Don't quit your day job, whatever that is, because you ain't going to
make it as political analyst.

Eric
  #2  
Old October 16th 09, 08:46 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Rick Jones[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 587
Default Buzz on Huffington Post

In sci.space.history Eric Chomko wrote:
Why would JFK offer Nixon a cabinet posistion?


Sounds like the sort of thing one would do in countries where
coalition goverments need to be formed. That, or something someone
who took "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer" very much
to heart.

Why would Nixon accept a cabinet position from the guy that just
beat him during the presidential race?


I agree it would be unlikely, particularly since Nixon had previously
been VP under Eisenhower. Still, why did Hillary Clinton accept the
appointment to be U.S. Secretary of State by Barak Obama? Is being
beaten during the primary really that much different for this sort of
thing?

Don't quit your day job, whatever that is, because you ain't going
to make it as political analyst.


How does the saying go? "Politics makes strange bedfellows."

rick jones
--
oxymoron n, Hummer H2 with California Save Our Coasts and Oceans plates
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buzz on Huffington Post Pat Flannery Policy 26 October 16th 09 08:46 PM
What the Buzz?! Pat Flannery Policy 1 May 26th 09 06:33 PM
I only post in one group, so I post it he My perpetual motion device page (physics and astro relates) gb6726 Astronomy Misc 5 August 13th 07 10:46 PM
Post Sputnik, Post Apollo, Post Shuttle ... Thomas Lee Elifritz Policy 9 June 9th 06 05:58 AM
Post-Cantorian Post-Goedelian Theory William Mook Policy 1 March 6th 06 01:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.