|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:23:20 -0800, Mary Shafer wrote:
I know my house will come through any possible earthquake just fine, because all the wire will hold it together. We've got the Cat-5e, telephone, two sets of coax, the security system, and the electrical wiring. Yes, I know what you mean. There's a lo-voltage integrator in these parts whose trucks bear the words "structural wiring". I laugh everytime I see what they no doubt meant to be "structured wiring" but then again... I'm also going to get a whole-house audio system installed into seven rooms and the patio and courtyard, leaving out only the 3.5 baths, the laundry room, and the walk-in closets. Ah, c'mon Mary, put'em in the bathrooms, you know you want to. G We put in 8 whole house speakers, my office, my wifes office, the dining room, the deck, the master bedroom (doubling as rear speakers for the boudoir mini-home theater), the master bath, the powder room (with a single dual voice coil speaker), and the exercise room. Only the poor guest are left out in the guest rooms and the guest bath. |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
single dual voice coil speaker), and the exercise room. Only the poor guest are left out in the guest rooms and the guest bath. How about the dogs house? |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:22:50 -0500, Rick DeNatale
wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:23:20 -0800, Mary Shafer wrote: I know my house will come through any possible earthquake just fine, because all the wire will hold it together. We've got the Cat-5e, telephone, two sets of coax, the security system, and the electrical wiring. Yes, I know what you mean. There's a lo-voltage integrator in these parts whose trucks bear the words "structural wiring". I laugh everytime I see what they no doubt meant to be "structured wiring" but then again... They strung the wire before they stuccoed and dry-walled and it really did look as if the house was held together with wire. I'm also going to get a whole-house audio system installed into seven rooms and the patio and courtyard, leaving out only the 3.5 baths, the laundry room, and the walk-in closets. Ah, c'mon Mary, put'em in the bathrooms, you know you want to. G The single biggest flaw of this builder, Del Webb, is the habit of making the master bath huge and sumptuous and the guest baths tiny and cramped. I've seen bigger baths in '50s motels. I don't think there's enough ceiling left, with the vent, fan, and lights, to put speakers in those baths. We might be able to get a set in the powder room, though. Oh, and I could put them in the sitting room and breakfast nook, too. I can't help but think there should be some sort of wireless sound system, if I only knew where to look. Ditto intercom. Or systems that use coax, since I have an extra set throughout the main rooms. We put in 8 whole house speakers, my office, my wifes office, the dining room, the deck, the master bedroom (doubling as rear speakers for the boudoir mini-home theater), the master bath, the powder room (with a single dual voice coil speaker), and the exercise room. Only the poor guest are left out in the guest rooms and the guest bath. Not the living room or kitchen? Here the living room, dining room, and master bedroom seem to be the absolute minimum, with the kitchen and breakfast nook coming next. Then it's the outdoor sites and then the guest rooms. I have to admit that the house currently has terrible acoustics. It's very hard and bright and likely to stay that way, with high ceilings, tile floors in most rooms, and no drapes. The so-called open architecture won't help, either. I'm pretty sure it would annoy the socks off me to play heavy metal in there, particularly with serious speakers. Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
I just finished reading where Mary (talking about her new house) wrote
(concerning wiring her house for sound): The single biggest flaw of this builder, Del Webb, is the habit of making the master bath huge and sumptuous and the guest baths tiny and cramped. I've seen bigger baths in '50s motels. I don't think there's enough ceiling left, with the vent, fan, and lights, to put speakers in those baths. We might be able to get a set in the powder room, though. Oh, and I could put them in the sitting room and breakfast nook, too. and then I segued, without noticing, into the conversation about refurbishing Mir, when she wrote: Bulkhead fasteners, of course. The same way you take hydraulic lines through the skin of the pressurized space of an airplane. Submarines and ships use them, too. Bulkhead fasteners. You're missing some o-rings and gaskets here and there and you've left out the fastenings, but you've got the basic idea. And I was wondering why someone was recommending using bulkhead fasteners to attach speakers in the guest baths... |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:09:11 -0800, Mary Shafer wrote:
The single biggest flaw of this builder, Del Webb, is the habit of making the master bath huge and sumptuous and the guest baths tiny and cramped. I've seen bigger baths in '50s motels. I don't think there's enough ceiling left, with the vent, fan, and lights, to put speakers in those baths. We might be able to get a set in the powder room, though. Oh, and I could put them in the sitting room and breakfast nook, too. In the "smallest" rooms, you only need to find room for one speaker. They make dual voice coil speakers which take both left and right inputs for just this purpose, that's what we put in the powder room. And just for giggles, we put a wall phone next to each commode. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
New Solar System Model that explains DW 2004 / Quaoar / Kuiper Belt and Pluto | hermesnines | Misc | 0 | February 24th 04 08:49 PM |
Strela Orbited Something | ed kyle | Policy | 5 | December 11th 03 11:13 PM |