|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
Hello Group,
My wife has been agitating for a digital camera for x-mas. We currently do not own a digital camera. My thoughts towards buying a digital camera is that it must serve my wife's demands (family snapshots, etc.) and my desires to attach it to a telescope. My scope is a 4" f6 refractor. Does anyone have a suggestion on the "best" camera for this purpose? What make, model are people having the best results from? Thanks in advance, Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
I think you will like the Canon Rebel D, SLR. Not only will this allow you
to take images of bright objects (moon, planets), but you can also do DSO's, as the camera will take images without noise for exposures much longer than you thought was possible. This means that you can take pictures of dim nebula, even without guiding. The only down side of the camera is the price. The lowest price I've seen for the camera (without lens) is $718. Al "scott" wrote in message m... Hello Group, My wife has been agitating for a digital camera for x-mas. We currently do not own a digital camera. My thoughts towards buying a digital camera is that it must serve my wife's demands (family snapshots, etc.) and my desires to attach it to a telescope. My scope is a 4" f6 refractor. Does anyone have a suggestion on the "best" camera for this purpose? What make, model are people having the best results from? Thanks in advance, Scott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 19:37:03 GMT, "Al" ...reflected:
I think you will like the Canon Rebel D, SLR. Not only will this allow you to take images of bright objects (moon, planets), but you can also do DSO's, as the camera will take images without noise for exposures much longer than you thought was possible. This means that you can take pictures of dim nebula, even without guiding. The only down side of the camera is the price. The lowest price I've seen for the camera (without lens) is $718. Al If everyone would stop running out to buy it the price would drop. We're all at the mercy of the other fellow's sense of value, I'm afraid. "scott" wrote in message om... Hello Group, My wife has been agitating for a digital camera for x-mas. We currently do not own a digital camera. My thoughts towards buying a digital camera is that it must serve my wife's demands (family snapshots, etc.) and my desires to attach it to a telescope. My scope is a 4" f6 refractor. Does anyone have a suggestion on the "best" camera for this purpose? What make, model are people having the best results from? Thanks in advance, Scott Alan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
That price is actually historically in line with what one previously paid
for a better SLR film camera. I remember paying well over $1000 in the late 1970's for my Olympus OM-2 gear. The Canon digital SLRs are an attractive alternative to paying $5000+ for a dedicated astronomical CCD camera, and sure as heck beat struggling with clumsy afocal setups with the point and shoot digital cameras. Del Johnson "Alan W. Craft" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 19:37:03 GMT, "Al" If everyone would stop running out to buy it the price would drop. We're all at the mercy of the other fellow's sense of value, I'm afraid. Alan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:04:03 -0800, "Del Johnson" delastro@{right star in Orion's belt}.sdsu.edu ...reflected:
That price is actually historically in line with what one previously paid for a better SLR film camera. I remember paying well over $1000 in the late 1970's for my Olympus OM-2 gear. The Canon digital SLRs are an attractive alternative to paying $5000+ for a dedicated astronomical CCD camera, and sure as heck beat struggling with clumsy afocal setups with the point and shoot digital cameras. Del Johnson What about Olympus's EM-1(?)? Also, can the shutter be left open indefinitely with the Canon? snip Alan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
Generally, a digital SLR (e.g., Canon 300D/Digital Rebel) is best,
since you can use the telescope as the lens. Non-dSLRs require an afocal approach and you have much more glass in the loop. Phil scott wrote: Hello Group, My wife has been agitating for a digital camera for x-mas. We currently do not own a digital camera. My thoughts towards buying a digital camera is that it must serve my wife's demands (family snapshots, etc.) and my desires to attach it to a telescope. My scope is a 4" f6 refractor. Does anyone have a suggestion on the "best" camera for this purpose? What make, model are people having the best results from? Thanks in advance, Scott |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
Canon 10D - bar none.
Take Care, JAS "scott" wrote in message m... Hello Group, My wife has been agitating for a digital camera for x-mas. We currently do not own a digital camera. My thoughts towards buying a digital camera is that it must serve my wife's demands (family snapshots, etc.) and my desires to attach it to a telescope. My scope is a 4" f6 refractor. Does anyone have a suggestion on the "best" camera for this purpose? What make, model are people having the best results from? Thanks in advance, Scott |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
"scott" wrote in message m... Hello Group, My wife has been agitating for a digital camera for x-mas. We currently do not own a digital camera. My thoughts towards buying a digital camera is that it must serve my wife's demands (family snapshots, etc.) and my desires to attach it to a telescope. My scope is a 4" f6 refractor. Does anyone have a suggestion on the "best" camera for this purpose? What make, model are people having the best results from? Thanks in advance, Scott Easy - the Canon 10D. Just look at the results posted various astro web sites. Only two drawbacks that I can think of, it is not cheap and if your wife had her heart set on a light weight point and shoot the Canon is not that! It is as heavy as most film SLR's. Chuck |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
"scott" wrote in message m... Hello Group, My wife has been agitating for a digital camera for x-mas. We currently do not own a digital camera. My thoughts towards buying a digital camera is that it must serve my wife's demands (family snapshots, etc.) and my desires to attach it to a telescope. My scope is a 4" f6 refractor. Does anyone have a suggestion on the "best" camera for this purpose? What make, model are people having the best results from? Thanks in advance, Scott I can't tell you which one to buy, but maybe steer you away from one. I have a Nikon CP5000. It's a great camera but doesn't do well for astro use on the scope. It's fairly noisy and is a pain to mount and use manually. Currently I'm looking at the new Canon Rebel DSLR to replace it. Steve |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Best" digital camera
Cheers Y'all
Personally I prefer a dedicated ccd for the scope http://www.grampianstars.com.au/drive.htm#ST-7 We use a "Sony 5.0 mega pixels Cyber-shot for happy snaps Robert -37.11 Nth 142.36 Est (scott) wrote in message om... Hello Group, My wife has been agitating for a digital camera for x-mas. We currently do not own a digital camera. My thoughts towards buying a digital camera is that it must serve my wife's demands (family snapshots, etc.) and my desires to attach it to a telescope. My scope is a 4" f6 refractor. Does anyone have a suggestion on the "best" camera for this purpose? What make, model are people having the best results from? Thanks in advance, Scott |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Questions, Telescope, Digital camera | Mark | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | November 25th 03 05:01 PM |
Digital camera vs. digital SLR | Michael A. Covington | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | October 27th 03 01:45 PM |
Digital Camera as Sky Meter: the Full Scoop | Tony Flanders | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | October 3rd 03 08:32 AM |
Digital Camera as Light-Pollution Meter: Initial Results | Tony Flanders | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | September 17th 03 12:11 PM |
Film or Digital Camera | Dave J. | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | July 28th 03 08:35 PM |