A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Einstein's Relativity Does Not Predict Time Travel



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 4th 18, 02:38 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Einstein's Relativity Does Not Predict Time Travel

In 1905 Einstein derived, from his two postulates, the conclusion "the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B":

Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B." http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

The conclusion was non sequitur - it didn't follow from Einstein's 1905 postulates. In other words, the argument leading from the postulates to the conclusion was INVALID.

The following two conclusions, in contrast, VALIDLY follow from the postulates:

Conclusion 1: The clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B, as judged from the stationary system.

Conclusion 2: The clock which has remained at B lags behind the clock moved from A to B, as judged from the moving system.

Conclusions 1 and 2, in their combination, give no prediction for the readings of the two clocks as they meet at B. That is, although conclusions 1 and 2 are logically correct (do follow from the postulates), their combination amounts to nonsense. Reductio ad absurdum par excellence - the postulates entail absurdity which means that at least one of them is false. If Einstein had been honest, he would have identified the false postulate and abandoned his theory immediately.

In contrast, the INVALIDLY deduced conclusion

"the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B"

could be wrong but is NOT NONSENSICAL. This implies that, if one doesn't see or decides to ignore the invalid deduction, there is no reason to abandon the theory "immediately" - one would have to wait for an experimental refutation. So Einstein's sleight of hand (invalid deduction) saved special relativity in 1905.

The famous "travel into the future" is a direct implication of the INVALIDLY deduced conclusion - the slowness of the moving clock means that its (moving) owner can remain virtually unchanged while sixty million years are passing for the stationary system:

Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")." http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein's Idiocies: Time Travel into the Future Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 April 27th 17 09:50 PM
Actually Einstein's Relativity Predicts No Time Travel Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 June 17th 16 10:41 AM
Einstein's Relativity Predicts No Time Travel Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 April 6th 16 12:31 AM
General Relativity, Going Strong at 92: Time Travel and Dark Energy Physics_Made_easy Misc 5 September 7th 07 07:47 PM
General Relativity, Going Strong at 92: Time Travel and Dark Energy physics_Made_Easy Astronomy Misc 0 September 6th 07 11:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.