A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Printing the planets on a 3D printer?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 3rd 12, 04:41 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro
Dean Keaton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Printing the planets on a 3D printer?

I have been thinking about printing the planets and our moon on a 3D
printer. Does anybody know where I can find the "raw data" to feed the
printer? Perhaps it would be best to make every mountain 10 times
higher than in the real world on the printout. How would this be done?

DK
  #2  
Old February 12th 12, 02:31 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro
Odysseus[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 534
Default Printing the planets on a 3D printer?

In article
,
Dean Keaton wrote:

I have been thinking about printing the planets and our moon on a 3D
printer. Does anybody know where I can find the "raw data" to feed the
printer?


That would depend on how the printer represents objects. But if you have
3-D modelling software to drive it, that can build a spheroid, some
basic dimensional data are he

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/planetfact.html

Perhaps it would be best to make every mountain 10 times
higher than in the real world on the printout. How would this be done?


Making relief globes obviously requires a lot more data! If you can
convert a coloured or shaded image to a height-map or texture and wrap
it around a spheroid (taking into account the map projection
represented), I'm sure there are suitable maps of at least the Earth,
Mars, and the Moon available (e.g. from the USGS). Radar-survey images
of the inner planets could also be similarly treated.

(Disclaimer: I have only a passing acquaintance with 3-D applications,
and couldn't begin to say how this is actually done with a given
program.)

You'd definitely have to increase the altitude scale for the relief to
be noticeable. On a 1:10^8 model of the Earth (about 13 cm in diameter)
even the Hawaiian Islands would stand only about 0.1 mm above the floor
of the Pacific. To make any but the most extreme features noticeable
you'd probably have to exaggerate them by a factor of at least fifty:
for example this would make the Alps or the Rockies about 1 mm higher
than the surrounding terrain at that sort of scale.

Olympus Mons is said to be the biggest mountain in the solar system, but
even so it would be a barely discernable lump on a Mars-globe without
considerable exaggeration.

How big is the printer, and what is its resolution? If your models are
all rendered at the same scale, small enough to make Jupiter a practical
size, it's likely that none of the rocky bodies will be large enough to
depict much surface detail at all, or even their asphericity
(flattening).

--
Odysseus
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Make a telescope using your printer Thad Floryan Amateur Astronomy 3 November 3rd 11 08:50 AM
OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer Starlord Amateur Astronomy 25 June 3rd 06 02:05 PM
printing slides C. Balci Amateur Astronomy 7 January 10th 05 04:31 AM
Building a simple rich field telescope? + laser printer [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 0 July 14th 03 05:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.