|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ares I Rocket Test Flight Facing Five Week Delay
KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FL - The first test flight of NASA's new ARES I
launch vehicle faces a five-week slip, constellation program officals said today. Delays in the production of new external tanks for the space shuttle will likely force a delay in the upcoming Hubble Space Telescope servicing mission and cause a domino effect on preparations for the Ares I-X flight currently targeted for next April. News of the potential schedule slip came Monday during a teleconference with project managers in NASA's Project constellation office. The Ares I-X test flight is currently targeted to blastoff from Kennedy Space Center's Launch complex 39-B around April 15, 2009. The launch pad hasn't been used since Discovery's STS-116 launch in December, 2006. No more space shuttle launches are scheduled to take place from the pad, but it can't be modified to accommodate the Ares I-X flight until after space shuttle Atlantis mission to service Hubble later this year. Before the launch pad can be handed over to Constellation, the shuttle program will require its availability to mount a mission to rescue the crew of Atlantis should that orbiter become disabled or experience serious damage that would prevent a safe re-entry. The full article and audio is available online he http://www.spacearium.com/article.ph...80518165726838 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ares I Rocket Test Flight Facing Five Week Delay
Brian Gaff wrote:
And this is new news?? Out of curiosity, just how vapourware vs hardware is that Ares I rocket at this point in time ? Are there final detailed designs and manufacturers are able to start to build it ? Or are the plans still being changed as fast as the mission specs are changing ? From the time when the detailed designs are finalised, how long does it take to actually built it ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ares I Rocket Test Flight Facing Five Week Delay
On Tue, 20 May 2008 16:48:05 GMT, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: And this is new news?? Or like anyone really cares about a five week delay in a program that won't be operational until something like 2016, even if nothing goes wrong between now and then? Brian |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ares I Rocket Test Flight Facing Five Week Delay
"Brian Thorn" wrote in message
... On Tue, 20 May 2008 16:48:05 GMT, "Brian Gaff" wrote: And this is new news?? Or like anyone really cares about a five week delay in a program that won't be operational until something like 2016, even if nothing goes wrong between now and then? Brian I'm hoping the monstrosity is cancelled by the next administration. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ares I Rocket Test Flight Facing Five Week Delay
"John Doe" wrote in message ... Brian Gaff wrote: And this is new news?? Out of curiosity, just how vapourware vs hardware is that Ares I rocket at this point in time ? That first "Ares I" flight will bear little resemblance to actual Ares I hardware. It appears to be an attempt to maintain support for the program by getting something, *anything*, flying a.s.a.p. Jeff -- A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ares I Rocket Test Flight Facing Five Week Delay
"Alan Erskine" wrote in message ... I'm hoping the monstrosity is cancelled by the next administration. You and me both. Jeff -- A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Ares I Rocket Test Flight Facing Five Week Delay
On Thu, 22 May 2008 14:09:36 -0400, "Jeff Findley"
wrote: Out of curiosity, just how vapourware vs hardware is that Ares I rocket at this point in time ? That first "Ares I" flight will bear little resemblance to actual Ares I hardware. It appears to be an attempt to maintain support for the program by getting something, *anything*, flying a.s.a.p. That's actually a brilliant move by NASA. I didn't think they had that in 'em anymore. Make no mistake, the public will eat it up. My question is, "If ATK test fired a five segment booster in Utah several years ago, why can't they use that configuration for the Ares 1-X demo?" At least, you'd think they'd try it on a Ares I-X Flight 2 or something. It's not like the FSB blew itself apart on the test stand. Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Private Rocket SpaceShipOne Makes Third Rocket-Powered Flight | Rusty B | Policy | 10 | May 16th 04 02:39 AM |
Private Rocket SpaceShipOne Makes Third Rocket-Powered Flight | Rusty B | Space Shuttle | 1 | May 14th 04 08:46 AM |
Private Rocket SpaceShipOne Makes Third Rocket-Powered Flight | Rusty B | Policy | 1 | May 14th 04 08:46 AM |