A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Moon's Near Side



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 28th 06, 11:07 PM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default The Moon's Near Side

Earth's closest astronomical neighbor, the Moon, is still not fully
understood. The side facing us is covered with large round features,
currently explained as the remnants of an early period of massive
bombardment which later filled up with wide-ranging lakes of magma.
Yet, it is a proven fact that such large scale lava infilling is a
physical impossibility. Also intriguing is the presence of
magnetospheres, located on the exact opposite side of several round
features. How can magnetic poles possibly be created by impacts? It
makes as much sense as the probability of such a massive bombardment
period in the first place -- that is, none.

There is no sense in the current explanation for our nearest, and most
memorable, astronomical feature -- the Man in the Moon...

  #2  
Old November 28th 06, 11:23 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Greg Neill[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default The Moon's Near Side

wrote in message
ups.com...
Earth's closest astronomical neighbor, the Moon, is still not fully
understood. The side facing us is covered with large round features,
currently explained as the remnants of an early period of massive
bombardment which later filled up with wide-ranging lakes of magma.
Yet, it is a proven fact that such large scale lava infilling is a
physical impossibility.


Oh yes? Proven by whom? Cites please.

Also intriguing is the presence of
magnetospheres, located on the exact opposite side of several round
features. How can magnetic poles possibly be created by impacts? It
makes as much sense as the probability of such a massive bombardment
period in the first place -- that is, none.


And your sources for this analysis are?


There is no sense in the current explanation for our nearest, and most
memorable, astronomical feature -- the Man in the Moon...


Methinks you've been reading from the wrong
(i.e. crackpot) sources.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
moon's rotation Ryan Evans Misc 25 December 15th 05 02:07 AM
Moon's Rotation ee99ee Amateur Astronomy 7 March 23rd 04 02:01 PM
Moon's path mike ring UK Astronomy 17 March 9th 04 06:57 PM
MX516 and ST7-ME Side to side Jaime Alemany CCD Imaging 0 February 3rd 04 08:07 PM
The Moon's Mountains Jose Suro Amateur Astronomy 3 December 6th 03 12:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.