![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you know of anyone who can disprove this theory either
scientifically or Biblically? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGdVtSh4wRs It's a theory that states our solar system was created by God in the beginning to manufacture subsequent Earths. Each Earth exists for a "season" which is the 7,000 Biblical cycle of in-service duty. This is followed by reclamation and recycling as the next planet steps up to serve the role of the next Earth, as the current Earth goes into recycling. The theory follows from the natural lines we see on the NOAA and GEBCO maps indicating the Earth used to be smaller (trace the lines backward and they all fit together on a smaller Earth). The size of the smaller Earth and the current Earth's size indicated hints at the planets in line being part of a solar system assembly line of sorts. The rest of the manufacturing process also naturally followed from that realization. You can see THE EARTH SEA FLOOR MAPS on the links at http://www.3alive.org. There's source code for the simulation at that link also if interested. I'd really like it if someone could disprove this theory. It's been a burden for me to bear since 2009. I'd like some hard fact that could say it absolutely could not be like this. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick C. Hodgin wrote on 5/3/21 3:42 am:
Do you know of anyone who can disprove this theory either scientifically or Biblically? Gee Whiz!! I would have though the existence of Dinosaur skeletons would provide the required evidance .... but, then, you would probably suggest those skeletons were incorporated into what becomes the Earth during its "Mars phase""! -- Daniel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:48:07 +1100
Daniel65 wrote: Rick C. Hodgin wrote on 5/3/21 3:42 am: Do you know of anyone who can disprove this theory either scientifically or Biblically? Gee Whiz!! I would have though the existence of Dinosaur skeletons would provide the required evidance .... but, then, you would probably suggest those skeletons were incorporated into what becomes the Earth during its "Mars phase""! There is a lot of information relating to the reptiles. There are four "living creatures" in Heaven who remain. Lucifer was the "Cherub that covered," and it's believed he was the fifth living creature, which would've been the reptiles. He also appeared in the garden as a serpent, and he's called the "old dragon" (dragon was the term for dinosaur before dinosaur was invented in the 1840s). So, the existence of dinosaurs alongside man is Biblical, and there's actually a very large body of evidence that they co-existed. You can see a video about it on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrkY...rDMc7s&index=4 There are dinosaurs carved into buildings that are thousands of years old. They have distinct appearances. There exist official state documents of a king who had an official dragon feeding job. And there are all of the tales in literature which convey things we assume are fairy tales today, but may have a basis in fact. The deposition of large quantities of dinosaur fossils aligns with the Biblical flood. The fact that that the Earth's climate changed after the flood would account for their significant decrease in number, though some survived and there have been accounts even in America of pterodactyls since we've been a nation. The evidence is out there. It's suppressed in mainstream media and by our learning institutions because they do not want people to know about the existence of Jesus Christ, sin, our need for salvation, and so on, because there's a literal war on for your soul. All Christians can do is point people to these things. It is God who works on the inside of each person, saving who will be saved. BTW, that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" is a theory. No one was there. There is no first-hand proof. It's all supposition based on an interpretation of data. But there are cases where the data they base their dating techniques on are flawed when you investigate them. As I say, all Christians can do is point someone to the truth. It's an act of God on the inside if they will believe. ----- Dinosaurs do not disprove this theory. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:16:00 -0500, "Rick C. Hodgin" wrote:
Lucifer "quomodo cecidisti de caelo lucifer qui mane how cut down you are from heaven, Lucifer, son of morning oriebaris corruisti in terram qui vulnerabas to be born, fallen to earth, which to make vulnerable gentes" the people. --Isaias 14:12, editio Vulgata |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
Do you know of anyone who can disprove this theory either scientifically or Biblically? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGdVtSh4wRs It's a theory that states our solar system was created by God in the beginning to manufacture subsequent Earths. Each Earth exists for a "season" which is the 7,000 Biblical cycle of in-service duty. This is followed by reclamation and recycling as the next planet steps up to serve the role of the next Earth, as the current Earth goes into recycling. The theory follows from the natural lines we see on the NOAA and GEBCO maps indicating the Earth used to be smaller (trace the lines backward and they all fit together on a smaller Earth). The size of the smaller Earth and the current Earth's size indicated hints at the planets in line being part of a solar system assembly line of sorts. The rest of the manufacturing process also naturally followed from that realization. .... I don't know why you are need to appeal to logic and science when it has all been written down for you. Surely logic is a trap set by Satan. ![]() There are several sciences that can deal with ideas of smaller or larger earths in the past. E.g. physics says if the earth was say 1/2 the size it is now yet approximately the same mass then it would have twice the gravity. Gravitational Biology (it's a thing now) finds a higher or lower gravity will affect the size of plants and animals. We might expect an Earth with 2x surface gravity to have plants only able to pump water up to "1/2" their present height and it is doubtful large dinosaurs would be able to exist at all because the strength of bone increases about proportional to size scale but the forces from gravity increase with the cube of the scale. Gravity can also have subtle effects. E.g. experiments have been done on fish and those raised in a 3g environment (centrifuge) have 10-20% smaller ear bones. AFAIK people studying these things in detail and using what they see and can reason about rather than a book of sometimes interesting folklore written (and sometimes lifted from other sources) by ancient goatherds have not noticed any signs of change in earth gravity over the past 4 billion years, let alone the last 10,000. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 20:47:16 +0000 (UTC)
R Kym Horsell wrote: Rick C. Hodgin wrote: Do you know of anyone who can disprove this theory either scientifically or Biblically? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGdVtSh4wRs It's a theory that states our solar system was created by God in the beginning to manufacture subsequent Earths. Each Earth exists for a "season" which is the 7,000 Biblical cycle of in-service duty. This is followed by reclamation and recycling as the next planet steps up to serve the role of the next Earth, as the current Earth goes into recycling. The theory follows from the natural lines we see on the NOAA and GEBCO maps indicating the Earth used to be smaller (trace the lines backward and they all fit together on a smaller Earth). The size of the smaller Earth and the current Earth's size indicated hints at the planets in line being part of a solar system assembly line of sorts. The rest of the manufacturing process also naturally followed from that realization. ... I don't know why you are need to appeal to logic and science when it has all been written down for you. Surely logic is a trap set by Satan. ![]() There are several sciences that can deal with ideas of smaller or larger earths in the past. E.g. physics says if the earth was say 1/2 the size it is now yet approximately the same mass then it would have twice the gravity. Gravitational Biology (it's a thing now) finds a higher or lower gravity will affect the size of plants and animals. We might expect an Earth with 2x surface gravity to have plants only able to pump water up to "1/2" their present height and it is doubtful large dinosaurs would be able to exist at all because the strength of bone increases about proportional to size scale but the forces from gravity increase with the cube of the scale. Gravity can also have subtle effects. E.g. experiments have been done on fish and those raised in a 3g environment (centrifuge) have 10-20% smaller ear bones. AFAIK people studying these things in detail and using what they see and can reason about rather than a book of sometimes interesting folklore written (and sometimes lifted from other sources) by ancient goatherds have not noticed any signs of change in earth gravity over the past 4 billion years, let alone the last 10,000. This is all theory, however, I do believe the gravitation of the Earth has changed, though I'm not sure it's changed since it's gone into service as its current Earth. The gravity of Mars is low, but in this theory Mars would have everything on the inside of it that the Earth does, sans some equipment that I believe is that gravity generator. Again, this is all theory. It's likely that the planets being developed on the solar system assembly line have some kind of gravity system to hold everything together, but not the one that's at full strength like we see on our Earth, and also on Venus. We don't know what gravity was like in the past, so it's not something we can prove. ----- Variable gravity doesn't prove or disprove this theory. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
.... We don't know what gravity was like in the past, so it's not something we can prove. Non-fringe science would have it we can look up in the sky and can see how it was in the past upto 14 bn years go. But as I said if you're going to keep using appeals to logic you have fallen into a trap probably set by demons. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 21:19:53 +0000 (UTC)
R Kym Horsell wrote: Rick C. Hodgin wrote: ... We don't know what gravity was like in the past, so it's not something we can prove. Non-fringe science would have it we can look up in the sky and can see how it was in the past upto 14 bn years go. But as I said if you're going to keep using appeals to logic you have fallen into a trap probably set by demons. We've only been experiencing things on this planet for as long as our civilizations are. Do things change on the Biblical cycle? In this theory the answer would be yes. But we also have a pattern for this in the natural world. Seasons. We have a planting, growing, harvesting, and a season where things are not active (winter). If this pattern was given us, and is part of a larger pattern of the Earths over these multiple "seasons" which are the 7,000 year Biblical cycles, then we can gain knowledge about this from what we see naturally applied to the larger scales. The New Jerusalem that comes out of Heaven is a cube approximately 1,200 miles on a side (it's just the right size to fit inside the moon, by the way). But, it's a cube. Why a cube? It has three gates on the North, three on the East, South, and West. 12 Gates total. To me it sounds like a block or a brick. If there are other solar systems out there like ours that have "crops of man" being created, then the New Jerusalem would be a transport taking the crop of man from this Earth to wherever we're going after this time of man on this current Earth. There's so much we don't know about what's out there. We have mainstream secular scientists telling us this that and the other thing about how it all works, but if they aren't seeking the truth, don't have a foundation in Biblical knowledge, don't trust in God, aren't born again, then how can we know what they say is correct? I admit that I do not know if my theory is correct, but I'm very seriously trying to disprove it with something that's actually provable. Because in the absence of that proof it remains possible. I appreciate your reply. If you have more thoughts or insight I would welcome it. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:29:33 -0500, "Rick C. Hodgin" wrote:
the natural world Charles Robert Darwin was born to Robert Waring & Susannah Wedgwood- Darwin at the 5,800sqft red-brick three-storey house his father had built named "The Mount"(2W45:48,52N42:46) in Shrewsbury, Shropshire, England on Sunday 12 February 1809 (time unknown, possibly 8:20 AM). |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick C. Hodgin wrote on 6/3/21 3:16 am:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:48:07 +1100 Daniel65 wrote: Rick C. Hodgin wrote on 5/3/21 3:42 am: Do you know of anyone who can disprove this theory either scientifically or Biblically? Gee Whiz!! I would have though the existence of Dinosaur skeletons would provide the required evidance .... but, then, you would probably suggest those skeletons were incorporated into what becomes the Earth during its "Mars phase""! There is a lot of information relating to the reptiles. There are four "living creatures" in Heaven who remain. Lucifer was the "Cherub that covered," and it's believed he was the fifth living creature, which would've been the reptiles. He also appeared in the garden as a serpent, and he's called the "old dragon" (dragon was the term for dinosaur before dinosaur was invented in the 1840s). So, the existence of dinosaurs alongside man is Biblical, and there's actually a very large body of evidence that they co-existed. You can see a video about it on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrkY...rDMc7s&index=4 There are dinosaurs carved into buildings that are thousands of years old. They have distinct appearances. There exist official state documents of a king who had an official dragon feeding job. And there are all of the tales in literature which convey things we assume are fairy tales today, but may have a basis in fact. The deposition of large quantities of dinosaur fossils aligns with the Biblical flood. The fact that that the Earth's climate changed after the flood would account for their significant decrease in number, though some survived and there have been accounts even in America of pterodactyls since we've been a nation. The evidence is out there. It's suppressed in mainstream media and by our learning institutions because they do not want people to know about the existence of Jesus Christ, sin, our need for salvation, and so on, because there's a literal war on for your soul. All Christians can do is point people to these things. It is God who works on the inside of each person, saving who will be saved. BTW, that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" is a theory. No one was there. There is no first-hand proof. It's all supposition based on an interpretation of data. But there are cases where the data they base their dating techniques on are flawed when you investigate them. As I say, all Christians can do is point someone to the truth. It's an act of God on the inside if they will believe. ----- Dinosaurs do not disprove this theory. God made Man in his own image ..... so if Man is an idiot, God must also be an idiot!! But God gave Man a Brain to use, to reason things out, to discover things. To use the Brain that God gave Man is to honour God To not do so is to insult God!! -- Daniel |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt1 What is this theory #10 Atom Totality Theory replacing BigBang theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 26th 11 07:20 PM |
MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book: ATOMTOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 8 | May 20th 09 01:17 AM |
Farm Theory, Also Called, Spring Theory, Yard Theory And TheEvolution Of Our Universe | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 29th 08 01:11 PM |
Does Arp's Picture disprove the Big Bang? | [email protected]. | Misc | 3 | February 2nd 07 02:39 AM |
Radars Conclusively Disprove O-Ring Theory | john_thomas_maxson | Space Shuttle | 27 | October 8th 04 09:59 PM |