|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:04:47 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Monday, April 21, 2014 3:18:46 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: Brad Guth was thinking very hard : On Monday, April 21, 2014 1:54:21 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Hägar wrote: Alas ... they didn't contact our resident wizard in everything galactic, namely the GuthBall, for the exact location, the speed of impact, the correct paramagnetic location and most of all, what kind of sensors they should have used. So the entire project will be a waste of time, not to mention taxpayer dollars, according to our Master Leaky Boat Patcher, GuthBall, who is much smarter than the average bear. http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/19/56...des-with-crash After all, a moron who sees artificial structures on Venus, a planet so hot that mankind will probably never, ever set foot on its surface. He also predicts that the Solar System is on a collision course with the Sirius Star system ... so the dude known everything there is to know, almost as smart as my wife. As the great Einstein mused, the difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits ... and we all know towards which way the Goth leans. So they spent billions of dollars to deliberately crash an old coke machine into the back of the moon,.....to stir up dust that we can't see from earth ?? Oh good,....I was worried they might be WASTING our money, on something pointless. They wouldn't want to upset any existing context of their NASA/Apollo era. *** NASA forgot to ask you again, Goth ... when will they ever learn ... What else is orbiting and even navigating and otherwise multiple hitting or soft-impacting our moon? (not of anything officially announced by our NASA, JPL or ASU, and it's not of exactly small stuff either). These substantial items were going way too fast to be orbiting, So what exactly are they if not some part of those Sirius asteroids and the truly enormous Oort cloud of considerable debris (conceivably a millionfold more than our Oort cloud has to offer) that we're passing through. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce0FljPKh14#t=270 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rPUhZSnlUI It's like we're seeing a shallow glancing blow after blow after blow, by something truly tough and large, and as per usual our JPL, ASU and NASA are remaining dead silent on this one, as they consistently do with all independent research and interpretations by outsiders. Our moon is by far the most imaged and video recorded item, and those cameras of our NASA, JPL, ASU, USAF and more than a few other public funded agencies have imaging technology that is always at least tenfold and even some thousandfold better than anything accomplished by outsiders/civilians. *** I see your brain is still malfunctioning, Goth ... don't you ever get tired of babbling the same old nonsense, day in, day out ... dance, little dumb-ass puppet ... dance ... Awww I'm sure all the data NASA claimed they got is legitimate. Just like their shots of the moon landing sites they now claim they took with Hubble. http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1..._image3_lg.jpg Gee, remember when they were saying that they couldn't take pictures of the moon with hubble because it was too bright,....but still managed to release these. ....NOPE,....nothing at all wrong with that story. They also can not take any pictures of our physically dark moon along with showing any other planets or stars, but oddly amateur astronomy cameras have never had that problem. Oddly none of their Kodak Apollo film was the least bit IR sensitive nor having been affected by any local radiation issues, and the surface of their moon was hardly ever physically dark (most of the time they showed us a light gray surface of .65 or more reflective surface), as well as always inert because there was never any hint of those pesky secondary/recoil photons due to the extent of unfiltered UV, and the dust was never electrostatic charged, the least bit paramagnetic and always offered terrific surface tension. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:04:47 AM UTC-5, Bast wrote:
Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Monday, April 21, 2014 3:18:46 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: Brad Guth was thinking very hard : On Monday, April 21, 2014 1:54:21 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Hägar wrote: Alas ... they didn't contact our resident wizard in everything galactic, namely the GuthBall, for the exact location, the speed of impact, the correct paramagnetic location and most of all, what kind of sensors they should have used. So the entire project will be a waste of time, not to mention taxpayer dollars, according to our Master Leaky Boat Patcher, GuthBall, who is much smarter than the average bear. http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/19/56...des-with-crash After all, a moron who sees artificial structures on Venus, a planet so hot that mankind will probably never, ever set foot on its surface. He also predicts that the Solar System is on a collision course with the Sirius Star system ... so the dude known everything there is to know, almost as smart as my wife. As the great Einstein mused, the difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits ... and we all know towards which way the Goth leans. So they spent billions of dollars to deliberately crash an old coke machine into the back of the moon,.....to stir up dust that we can't see from earth ?? Oh good,....I was worried they might be WASTING our money, on something pointless. They wouldn't want to upset any existing context of their NASA/Apollo era. *** NASA forgot to ask you again, Goth ... when will they ever learn ... What else is orbiting and even navigating and otherwise multiple hitting or soft-impacting our moon? (not of anything officially announced by our NASA, JPL or ASU, and it's not of exactly small stuff either). These substantial items were going way too fast to be orbiting, So what exactly are they if not some part of those Sirius asteroids and the truly enormous Oort cloud of considerable debris (conceivably a millionfold more than our Oort cloud has to offer) that we're passing through. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce0FljPKh14#t=270 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rPUhZSnlUI It's like we're seeing a shallow glancing blow after blow after blow, by something truly tough and large, and as per usual our JPL, ASU and NASA are remaining dead silent on this one, as they consistently do with all independent research and interpretations by outsiders. Our moon is by far the most imaged and video recorded item, and those cameras of our NASA, JPL, ASU, USAF and more than a few other public funded agencies have imaging technology that is always at least tenfold and even some thousandfold better than anything accomplished by outsiders/civilians. *** I see your brain is still malfunctioning, Goth ... don't you ever get tired of babbling the same old nonsense, day in, day out ... dance, little dumb-ass puppet ... dance ... Awww I'm sure all the data NASA claimed they got is legitimate. Just like their shots of the moon landing sites they now claim they took with Hubble. http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1..._image3_lg.jpg Gee, remember when they were saying that they couldn't take pictures of the moon with hubble because it was too bright,....but still managed to release these. ....NOPE,....nothing at all wrong with that story. Except I don't think any of those photos were taken by Hubble. The recent images of the moon landing site were taken by an orbiting probe, if I'm not mistaken. Dan (Woj...) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:14:23 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:33:40 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Monday, April 21, 2014 3:18:46 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: Brad Guth was thinking very hard : On Monday, April 21, 2014 1:54:21 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Hägar wrote: Alas ... they didn't contact our resident wizard in everything galactic, namely the GuthBall, for the exact location, the speed of impact, the correct paramagnetic location and most of all, what kind of sensors they should have used. So the entire project will be a waste of time, not to mention taxpayer dollars, according to our Master Leaky Boat Patcher, GuthBall, who is much smarter than the average bear. http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/19/56...des-with-crash After all, a moron who sees artificial structures on Venus, a planet so hot that mankind will probably never, ever set foot on its surface. He also predicts that the Solar System is on a collision course with the Sirius Star system ... so the dude known everything there is to know, almost as smart as my wife. As the great Einstein mused, the difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits ... and we all know towards which way the Goth leans. So they spent billions of dollars to deliberately crash an old coke machine into the back of the moon,.....to stir up dust that we can't see from earth ?? Oh good,....I was worried they might be WASTING our money, on something pointless. They wouldn't want to upset any existing context of their NASA/Apollo era. *** NASA forgot to ask you again, Goth ... when will they ever learn ... What else is orbiting and even navigating and otherwise multiple hitting or soft-impacting our moon? (not of anything officially announced by our NASA, JPL or ASU, and it's not of exactly small stuff either). These substantial items were going way too fast to be orbiting, So what exactly are they if not some part of those Sirius asteroids and the truly enormous Oort cloud of considerable debris (conceivably a millionfold more than our Oort cloud has to offer) that we're passing through. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce0FljPKh14#t=270 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rPUhZSnlUI It's like we're seeing a shallow glancing blow after blow after blow, by something truly tough and large, and as per usual our JPL, ASU and NASA are remaining dead silent on this one, as they consistently do with all independent research and interpretations by outsiders. Our moon is by far the most imaged and video recorded item, and those cameras of our NASA, JPL, ASU, USAF and more than a few other public funded agencies have imaging technology that is always at least tenfold and even some thousandfold better than anything accomplished by outsiders/civilians. *** I see your brain is still malfunctioning, Goth ... don't you ever get tired of babbling the same old nonsense, day in, day out ... dance, little dumb-ass puppet ... dance ... Are you suggesting that retail consumer cameras put bogus artifacts into their images? Of course they certainly *can* include artifacts. A clever guy like you should be able to come up with 2 or 3 reasonable (non-extraordinary) explanations without too much time or effort. Dan (Woj...) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:57:38 AM UTC-7, Dan (Woj...) wrote: On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:14:23 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote: Are you suggesting that retail consumer cameras put bogus artifacts into their images? Of course they certainly *can* include artifacts. A clever guy like you should be able to come up with 2 or 3 reasonable (non-extraordinary) explanations without too much time or effort. Dan (Woj...) Must be our lucky day. As yet you can not show us one example that's similar as to looking like an asteroid glancing over the surface of our moon, or that of one passing between Earth and the moon. *** Well Goth, you can always run your lame and tired and grainy radar image of Venus again ... you know the one I'm talking about, where only YOU can see all those nifty intelligence based structures ... that would be fun, for a change .. NOT!! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
On Monday, April 21, 2014 10:52:46 AM UTC-4, Hägar wrote:
Alas ... they didn't contact our resident wizard in everything galactic, namely the GuthBall, for the exact location, the speed of impact, the correct paramagnetic location and most of all, what kind of sensors they should have used. So the entire project will be a waste of time, not to mention taxpayer dollars, according to our Master Leaky Boat Patcher, GuthBall, who is much smarter than the average bear. http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/19/56...des-with-crash After all, a moron who sees artificial structures on Venus, a planet so hot that mankind will probably never, ever set foot on its surface. He also predicts that the Solar System is on a collision course with the Sirius Star system ... so the dude known everything there is to know, almost as smart as my wife. As the great Einstein mused, the difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits ... and we all know towards which way the Goth leans. NASA went Mafia with Nixon and Kissinger. It was the beginning of USA dark side. Now it evolved into Corporate America TebeT |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
... *** there ya go ... dance little boi ... dance ... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 6:00:11 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ... *** there ya go ... dance little boi ... dance ... How is it that a Zionist Nazi Republican or Redneck like yourself, that's always right about everything, doesn't have anything better to be doing? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 6:00:11 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... *** there ya go ... dance little boi ... dance ... How is it that a Zionist Nazi Republican or Redneck like yourself, that's always right about everything, doesn't have anything better to be doing? *** I do have better things to do and I do them on a daily basis, and I do them well ... this is just a hobby for me ... and I do it just as well, if not better ... remember, engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed dufus like yourself is not really the challenge you perceive it to be. Now dance, little boi ... dance |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
NASA slams spacecraft into Dark Side of the Moon ...
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 5:32:39 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 6:00:11 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... *** there ya go ... dance little boi ... dance ... How is it that a Zionist Nazi Republican or Redneck like yourself, that's always right about everything, doesn't have anything better to be doing? *** I do have better things to do and I do them on a daily basis, and I do them well ... this is just a hobby for me ... and I do it just as well, if not better ... remember, engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed dufus like yourself is not really the challenge you perceive it to be. Now dance, little boi ... dance Then why is nothing of your coal derived energy getting fixed? Does any of your work have to do with Duke Energy mess and its cleanup fiasco? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA - NASA Spacecraft Helps Researchers See the Sun's Far Side | Nick | UK Astronomy | 0 | March 13th 06 10:40 PM |
NASA Says a Next Generation Spacecraft Would Use a Vertical ArrangementInstead of Side Mount | John Horner | Space Shuttle | 10 | August 1st 05 07:07 PM |
Grey Aliens On The Moon Dark side of the moon | Happy Troll | Astronomy Misc | 98 | September 9th 04 01:48 PM |
Dark side of the moon | Asimov | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 04 03:39 AM |
Why does the moon always have a dark side? | Richard Henry | Astronomy Misc | 51 | April 13th 04 09:03 AM |