NASA considers outpost beyond moon's far side

On Feb 15, 12:23*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Feb 13, 5:04*pm, |"









wrote:
On Feb 12, 10:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Feb 12, 6:45*pm, wrote:

"NASA is pressing forward on assessing the value of a "human-tended
waypoint" near the far side of the moon — one that would embrace
international partnerships as well as commercial and academic
participation,
Space.com has learned.

According to a Feb. 3 memo from William Gerstenmaier, NASA's
associate
administrator for human exploration and operations, a team is being
formed
to develop a cohesive plan for exploring a spot in space known as the
Earth-
moon libration point 2 (EML-2)."

See:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46354336#.Tzh437QvjIU

Our NASA can't afford to consider squat. *President BHO should have
fired every last one of our NASA pricks as of day-one.

The nations needs to rebuild its industrial base so as to better
afford such projects. And the poor man (the majority now)
who aren't going to get ahead
aren't going to care or generate the resources needed to such a
project. The ultra-rich really don't care as they are too busy
doing drugs (both RX and illegal) and banging high class hookers.

The positions use seems limited to its view and
its distance. Perhaps it could used to assemble
a multiple part craft away from certain nations that might
take pot shots at a defenseless vessel.

$100 billion per month really isn't all that much ($14.28/person).

I know of many that spend twice that much on coffee per day, not to
mention whatever cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, sports, junk-foods,
entertainment, travel and just in tips alone.

How else (other than perpetual wars) are you going to create 100
million jobs?

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

Pharmaceuticals and junk food are people too ;-)
But for a 100 million jobs, it would be good to go the distance ;-)

On Feb 15, 5:51*pm, |"
wrote:
On Feb 15, 12:23*pm, Brad Guth wrote:









On Feb 13, 5:04*pm, |"

wrote:
On Feb 12, 10:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Feb 12, 6:45*pm, wrote:

"NASA is pressing forward on assessing the value of a "human-tended
waypoint" near the far side of the moon — one that would embrace
international partnerships as well as commercial and academic
participation,
Space.com has learned.

According to a Feb. 3 memo from William Gerstenmaier, NASA's
associate
administrator for human exploration and operations, a team is being
formed
to develop a cohesive plan for exploring a spot in space known as the
Earth-
moon libration point 2 (EML-2)."

See:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46354336#.Tzh437QvjIU

Our NASA can't afford to consider squat. *President BHO should have
fired every last one of our NASA pricks as of day-one.

The nations needs to rebuild its industrial base so as to better
afford such projects. And the poor man (the majority now)
who aren't going to get ahead
aren't going to care or generate the resources needed to such a
project. The ultra-rich really don't care as they are too busy
doing drugs (both RX and illegal) and banging high class hookers.

The positions use seems limited to its view and
its distance. Perhaps it could used to assemble
a multiple part craft away from certain nations that might
take pot shots at a defenseless vessel.

$100 billion per month really isn't all that much ($14.28/person).

I know of many that spend twice that much on coffee per day, not to
mention whatever cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, sports, junk-foods,
entertainment, travel and just in tips alone.

How else (other than perpetual wars) are you going to create 100
million jobs?

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

Pharmaceuticals and junk food are people too ;-)
But for a 100 million jobs, it would be good to go the distance ;-)

In deed. For each and every full-time employed person typically
generates two or three other part-time or minimum wage jobs, not that
China or India have any enforced minimum wage or much less employment
benefits to start with.

Via automation and greater assembly efficiency, large scale rockets
and the necessary infrastructure for large scale off-world
exploitation activity could be managed.

Upgraded F1s for burning SHTP(slush HTP) and synfuel/hydrocarbons
could be mass produced at perhaps not 10% the American/NASA price tag.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Feb 12, 6:45*pm, wrote:
"NASA is pressing forward on assessing the value of a "human-tended
waypoint" near the far side of the moon — one that would embrace
international partnerships as well as commercial and academic
participation,
Space.com has learned.

According to a Feb. 3 memo from William Gerstenmaier, NASA's
associate
administrator for human exploration and operations, a team is being
formed
to develop a cohesive plan for exploring a spot in space known as the
Earth-
moon libration point 2 (EML-2)."

See:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46354336#.Tzh437QvjIU

NASA considers butt-plugs with built-in tasers a good idea.